Subhash Chander, Ahmad Bin Aamir, Rabia Latif, Om Parkash, F N U Sorath, Sam Tan, Abhi Chand Lohana, Sheena Shiwlani, Mohammed Yaqub Nadeem
{"title":"透析患者心律失常类型与心源性猝死的风险:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Subhash Chander, Ahmad Bin Aamir, Rabia Latif, Om Parkash, F N U Sorath, Sam Tan, Abhi Chand Lohana, Sheena Shiwlani, Mohammed Yaqub Nadeem","doi":"10.1186/s43044-025-00606-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients on long-term dialysis for end-stage kidney disease have a high mortality rate, predominantly due to sudden cardiac death (SCD), which is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmias compared to the general population. Thus, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the incidence of SCD among dialysis patients at risk of arrhythmia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Medline, and Europe PMC were searched for articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Studies with risk assessment of arrhythmias and the incidence of SCD in dialysis patients were considered for inclusion. Effect size from eligible studies was pooled using a random effects model and restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and the risk of publication bias was evaluated by visually inspecting funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search strategy yielded 5861 studies, of which 1960 duplicate entries were removed in the prescreening stage, 3326 were excluded after title/abstract screening, and 519 after full-text screening for not meeting our inclusion criteria. Finally, 11 studies were included in the analysis, and two more were selected from the bibliography list of previous reviews. Eight included studies were randomized controlled trials, and five were cohort studies, which provided a pooled population size of 12,611 dialysis patients for the meta-analysis, which indicated a significantly larger effect size of arrhythmia [Cohen's d = 110.38 (95%CI 42.72-178.05), p = 0.0]. Visual assessment of the funnel plot indicated no publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCD remains a significant public health concern, particularly in patients undergoing dialysis. Meta-analysis results show that bradyarrhythmia is a common arrhythmic condition leading to SCD; however, other arrhythmias should also be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":74993,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology","volume":"77 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type of arrhythmias and the risk of sudden cardiac death in dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Subhash Chander, Ahmad Bin Aamir, Rabia Latif, Om Parkash, F N U Sorath, Sam Tan, Abhi Chand Lohana, Sheena Shiwlani, Mohammed Yaqub Nadeem\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43044-025-00606-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients on long-term dialysis for end-stage kidney disease have a high mortality rate, predominantly due to sudden cardiac death (SCD), which is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmias compared to the general population. Thus, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the incidence of SCD among dialysis patients at risk of arrhythmia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Medline, and Europe PMC were searched for articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Studies with risk assessment of arrhythmias and the incidence of SCD in dialysis patients were considered for inclusion. Effect size from eligible studies was pooled using a random effects model and restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and the risk of publication bias was evaluated by visually inspecting funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search strategy yielded 5861 studies, of which 1960 duplicate entries were removed in the prescreening stage, 3326 were excluded after title/abstract screening, and 519 after full-text screening for not meeting our inclusion criteria. Finally, 11 studies were included in the analysis, and two more were selected from the bibliography list of previous reviews. Eight included studies were randomized controlled trials, and five were cohort studies, which provided a pooled population size of 12,611 dialysis patients for the meta-analysis, which indicated a significantly larger effect size of arrhythmia [Cohen's d = 110.38 (95%CI 42.72-178.05), p = 0.0]. Visual assessment of the funnel plot indicated no publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCD remains a significant public health concern, particularly in patients undergoing dialysis. Meta-analysis results show that bradyarrhythmia is a common arrhythmic condition leading to SCD; however, other arrhythmias should also be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-025-00606-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-025-00606-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:终末期肾病的长期透析患者死亡率高,主要是由于心源性猝死(SCD),与一般人群相比,这与心律失常的风险增加有关。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在调查有心律失常风险的透析患者中SCD的发生率。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南。检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、谷歌Scholar、Medline和Europe PMC等符合纳入标准的文章。考虑纳入透析患者心律失常风险评估和SCD发生率的研究。使用随机效应模型和限制性最大似然估计对符合条件的研究的效应量进行汇总。异质性采用I2统计量量化,发表偏倚风险采用漏斗图目测评价。结果:我们的检索策略产生5861项研究,其中1960项重复条目在预筛选阶段被删除,3326项在标题/摘要筛选后被排除,519项在全文筛选后因不符合我们的纳入标准而被排除。最后,11项研究被纳入分析,另外两项研究从先前综述的参考书目列表中选择。8项纳入的研究为随机对照试验,5项为队列研究,为meta分析提供了12611例透析患者的汇总人群规模,表明心律失常的效应量显著较大[Cohen’s d = 110.38 (95%CI 42.72-178.05), p = 0.0]。漏斗图的视觉评价显示无发表偏倚。结论:SCD仍然是一个重要的公共卫生问题,特别是在接受透析的患者中。荟萃分析结果显示,慢速心律失常是导致SCD的常见心律失常;然而,其他心律失常也应考虑。
Type of arrhythmias and the risk of sudden cardiac death in dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Patients on long-term dialysis for end-stage kidney disease have a high mortality rate, predominantly due to sudden cardiac death (SCD), which is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmias compared to the general population. Thus, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the incidence of SCD among dialysis patients at risk of arrhythmia.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Medline, and Europe PMC were searched for articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Studies with risk assessment of arrhythmias and the incidence of SCD in dialysis patients were considered for inclusion. Effect size from eligible studies was pooled using a random effects model and restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic, and the risk of publication bias was evaluated by visually inspecting funnel plots.
Results: Our search strategy yielded 5861 studies, of which 1960 duplicate entries were removed in the prescreening stage, 3326 were excluded after title/abstract screening, and 519 after full-text screening for not meeting our inclusion criteria. Finally, 11 studies were included in the analysis, and two more were selected from the bibliography list of previous reviews. Eight included studies were randomized controlled trials, and five were cohort studies, which provided a pooled population size of 12,611 dialysis patients for the meta-analysis, which indicated a significantly larger effect size of arrhythmia [Cohen's d = 110.38 (95%CI 42.72-178.05), p = 0.0]. Visual assessment of the funnel plot indicated no publication bias.
Conclusion: SCD remains a significant public health concern, particularly in patients undergoing dialysis. Meta-analysis results show that bradyarrhythmia is a common arrhythmic condition leading to SCD; however, other arrhythmias should also be considered.