动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血脑室腹腔分流术的预测因素。

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.104164
Renato Pereira, Beatriz Torres, João Nogueira, Frederica Coimbra, Miguel Afonso, Carlos Alegria, Renata Marques
{"title":"动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血脑室腹腔分流术的预测因素。","authors":"Renato Pereira, Beatriz Torres, João Nogueira, Frederica Coimbra, Miguel Afonso, Carlos Alegria, Renata Marques","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.104164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) are life-threatening events with high mortality and morbidity. Hydrocephalus is a common complication, initially managed with an external ventricular drain (EVD). Persistent hydrocephalus often requires ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement to relieve intracranial pressure and prevent further neurological damage.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What factors predict the need for VPS placement in patients with aSAH, and how does a new predictive model compare to the Mayo Age, Grades, EVD score (MAGE score)?</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 105 patients with aSAH treated with EVD between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: those requiring VPS (n= 45) and those not requiring VPS (n= 60). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analysed, and a new predictive model (SAH-VP) was developed and compared to the MAGE score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who required VPS had higher WFNS scores on admission (p= 0.045), more infections requiring antibiotics (p= 0.002), more failed weaning attempts (p= 0.004), more failed closure attempts (p= 0.002), and longer EVD use (p< 0.01). The new SAH-VP model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>There is no consensus on the factors predicting VPS need in SAH patients. This study identified key predictors and developed a new predictive model, SAH-VP, which could improve patient management by identifying those at higher risk of requiring VPS, offering an alternative to the existing MAGE score.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"104164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive factors for ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages.\",\"authors\":\"Renato Pereira, Beatriz Torres, João Nogueira, Frederica Coimbra, Miguel Afonso, Carlos Alegria, Renata Marques\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2024.104164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) are life-threatening events with high mortality and morbidity. Hydrocephalus is a common complication, initially managed with an external ventricular drain (EVD). Persistent hydrocephalus often requires ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement to relieve intracranial pressure and prevent further neurological damage.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What factors predict the need for VPS placement in patients with aSAH, and how does a new predictive model compare to the Mayo Age, Grades, EVD score (MAGE score)?</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 105 patients with aSAH treated with EVD between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: those requiring VPS (n= 45) and those not requiring VPS (n= 60). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analysed, and a new predictive model (SAH-VP) was developed and compared to the MAGE score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who required VPS had higher WFNS scores on admission (p= 0.045), more infections requiring antibiotics (p= 0.002), more failed weaning attempts (p= 0.004), more failed closure attempts (p= 0.002), and longer EVD use (p< 0.01). The new SAH-VP model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>There is no consensus on the factors predicting VPS need in SAH patients. This study identified key predictors and developed a new predictive model, SAH-VP, which could improve patient management by identifying those at higher risk of requiring VPS, offering an alternative to the existing MAGE score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"104164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718286/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.104164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.104164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)是危及生命的事件,具有很高的死亡率和发病率。脑积水是一种常见的并发症,最初通过室外引流(EVD)进行治疗。持续性脑积水通常需要放置脑室-腹膜分流术(VPS)以减轻颅内压并防止进一步的神经损伤。研究问题:哪些因素可以预测aSAH患者是否需要放置VPS,新的预测模型如何与Mayo年龄、评分、EVD评分(MAGE评分)进行比较?材料与方法:回顾性研究2014 - 2023年收治的105例aSAH合并EVD患者。患者分为两组:需要VPS组(n= 45)和不需要VPS组(n= 60)。分析社会人口学、临床和治疗变量,建立新的预测模型(SAH-VP)并与MAGE评分进行比较。结果:需要VPS的患者入院时WFNS评分较高(p= 0.045),需要抗生素的感染较多(p= 0.002),更多失败的断奶尝试(p= 0.004),更多失败的关闭尝试(p= 0.002), EVD使用时间较长(p)讨论和结论:对SAH患者需要VPS的预测因素尚无共识。本研究确定了关键预测因子,并开发了一种新的预测模型SAH-VP,该模型可以通过识别那些需要VPS的高风险患者来改善患者管理,为现有的MAGE评分提供了一种替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive factors for ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages.

Introduction: Aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) are life-threatening events with high mortality and morbidity. Hydrocephalus is a common complication, initially managed with an external ventricular drain (EVD). Persistent hydrocephalus often requires ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement to relieve intracranial pressure and prevent further neurological damage.

Research question: What factors predict the need for VPS placement in patients with aSAH, and how does a new predictive model compare to the Mayo Age, Grades, EVD score (MAGE score)?

Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 105 patients with aSAH treated with EVD between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: those requiring VPS (n= 45) and those not requiring VPS (n= 60). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analysed, and a new predictive model (SAH-VP) was developed and compared to the MAGE score.

Results: Patients who required VPS had higher WFNS scores on admission (p= 0.045), more infections requiring antibiotics (p= 0.002), more failed weaning attempts (p= 0.004), more failed closure attempts (p= 0.002), and longer EVD use (p< 0.01). The new SAH-VP model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800.

Discussion and conclusion: There is no consensus on the factors predicting VPS need in SAH patients. This study identified key predictors and developed a new predictive model, SAH-VP, which could improve patient management by identifying those at higher risk of requiring VPS, offering an alternative to the existing MAGE score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信