使用外部数据的跨研究测量版本的统计统一:自评健康和自评记忆。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yingyan Wu MS , Eleanor Hayes-Larson PhD, MPH , Yixuan Zhou , Vincent Bouteloup PharmD , Scott C. Zimmerman MPH , Anna M. Pederson MPH , Vincent Planche MD, PhD , Marissa J. Seamans PhD, MSPH , Daniel Westreich PhD , M. Maria Glymour , Laura E. Gibbons PhD , Carole Dufouil PhD , Elizabeth Rose Mayeda PhD, MPH
{"title":"使用外部数据的跨研究测量版本的统计统一:自评健康和自评记忆。","authors":"Yingyan Wu MS ,&nbsp;Eleanor Hayes-Larson PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Yixuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Vincent Bouteloup PharmD ,&nbsp;Scott C. Zimmerman MPH ,&nbsp;Anna M. Pederson MPH ,&nbsp;Vincent Planche MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marissa J. Seamans PhD, MSPH ,&nbsp;Daniel Westreich PhD ,&nbsp;M. Maria Glymour ,&nbsp;Laura E. Gibbons PhD ,&nbsp;Carole Dufouil PhD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Rose Mayeda PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Harmonizing variables for constructs measured differently across studies is essential for comparing, combining, and generalizing results. We developed and fielded a brief survey to harmonize Likert and continuous versions of measures for two constructs, self-rated health and self-rated memory, for use in studies of French older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We recruited 300 participants from a French memory clinic in 2023 to answer both the Likert and continuous versions of self-rated health and self-rated memory questions. For each construct, we predicted responses to the Likert version with multinomial and ordinal logistic models, varying specifications of continuous version responses (linear or spline) and covariate sets (question order, age, sex/gender, and interactions between the continuous version and covariates). We also implemented a percentiles-based crosswalk sensitivity analysis. We compared Cohen’s weighted kappa values to identify the best statistical harmonization approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the final models [multinomial models with continuous version spline, question order (self-rated memory model only), age, sex/gender, and interactions between the continuous version and covariates], weighted kappa values were 0.61 for self-rated health and 0.60 for self-rated memory, reflecting moderate agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Primary data collection feasibly facilitates statistical harmonization of variables for constructs measured differently across studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"102 ","pages":"Pages 86-90"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical harmonization of versions of measures across studies using external data: Self-rated health and self-rated memory\",\"authors\":\"Yingyan Wu MS ,&nbsp;Eleanor Hayes-Larson PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Yixuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Vincent Bouteloup PharmD ,&nbsp;Scott C. Zimmerman MPH ,&nbsp;Anna M. Pederson MPH ,&nbsp;Vincent Planche MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marissa J. Seamans PhD, MSPH ,&nbsp;Daniel Westreich PhD ,&nbsp;M. Maria Glymour ,&nbsp;Laura E. Gibbons PhD ,&nbsp;Carole Dufouil PhD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Rose Mayeda PhD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Harmonizing variables for constructs measured differently across studies is essential for comparing, combining, and generalizing results. We developed and fielded a brief survey to harmonize Likert and continuous versions of measures for two constructs, self-rated health and self-rated memory, for use in studies of French older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We recruited 300 participants from a French memory clinic in 2023 to answer both the Likert and continuous versions of self-rated health and self-rated memory questions. For each construct, we predicted responses to the Likert version with multinomial and ordinal logistic models, varying specifications of continuous version responses (linear or spline) and covariate sets (question order, age, sex/gender, and interactions between the continuous version and covariates). We also implemented a percentiles-based crosswalk sensitivity analysis. We compared Cohen’s weighted kappa values to identify the best statistical harmonization approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the final models [multinomial models with continuous version spline, question order (self-rated memory model only), age, sex/gender, and interactions between the continuous version and covariates], weighted kappa values were 0.61 for self-rated health and 0.60 for self-rated memory, reflecting moderate agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Primary data collection feasibly facilitates statistical harmonization of variables for constructs measured differently across studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 86-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279725000080\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279725000080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:协调不同研究中不同测量结构的变量对于比较、组合和概括结果是必不可少的。我们开发并进行了一项简短的调查,以协调李克特和连续版本的两个构式测量,自评健康和自评记忆,用于法国老年人的研究。方法:我们于2023年从法国一家记忆诊所招募了300名参与者,回答了李克特和连续版本的自评健康和自评记忆问题。对于每个结构,我们使用多项和有序逻辑模型、不同规格的连续版本反应(线性或样条)和协变量集(问题顺序、年龄、性别/性别以及连续版本和协变量之间的相互作用)预测对李克特版本的反应。我们还实施了基于百分位数的人行横道敏感性分析。我们比较了Cohen的加权kappa值,以确定最佳的统计协调方法。结果:在最终模型[具有连续版本样条、问题顺序(仅自评记忆模型)、年龄、性别/性别和连续版本与协变量之间相互作用的多项模型]中,自评健康的加权kappa值为0.61,自评记忆的加权kappa值为0.60,反映出中度一致性。结论:原始数据收集可行地促进了在不同研究中测量不同结构的变量的统计协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical harmonization of versions of measures across studies using external data: Self-rated health and self-rated memory

Purpose

Harmonizing variables for constructs measured differently across studies is essential for comparing, combining, and generalizing results. We developed and fielded a brief survey to harmonize Likert and continuous versions of measures for two constructs, self-rated health and self-rated memory, for use in studies of French older adults.

Methods

We recruited 300 participants from a French memory clinic in 2023 to answer both the Likert and continuous versions of self-rated health and self-rated memory questions. For each construct, we predicted responses to the Likert version with multinomial and ordinal logistic models, varying specifications of continuous version responses (linear or spline) and covariate sets (question order, age, sex/gender, and interactions between the continuous version and covariates). We also implemented a percentiles-based crosswalk sensitivity analysis. We compared Cohen’s weighted kappa values to identify the best statistical harmonization approach.

Results

In the final models [multinomial models with continuous version spline, question order (self-rated memory model only), age, sex/gender, and interactions between the continuous version and covariates], weighted kappa values were 0.61 for self-rated health and 0.60 for self-rated memory, reflecting moderate agreement.

Conclusions

Primary data collection feasibly facilitates statistical harmonization of variables for constructs measured differently across studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信