小碎片螺钉和小碎片螺钉在急性韧带联合损伤中的可比较性。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Stein B M van den Heuvel, Diederick Penning, Jens A Halm, Tim Schepers
{"title":"小碎片螺钉和小碎片螺钉在急性韧带联合损伤中的可比较性。","authors":"Stein B M van den Heuvel, Diederick Penning, Jens A Halm, Tim Schepers","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ankle fractures are often accompanied by syndesmotic injuries, contributing to instability and potential long term complications. Syndesmotic injuries are traditionally fixed with either small fragment (3.5-mm diameter) or large fragment (4.5-mm diameter) syndesmotic screws. With regards to the recent emergence of less prominent implants for ankle fracture, this study was set out to compare the outcomes of mini fragment screws (2.7-mm or 2.8-mm diameter) and small fragment screws in syndesmotic fixation. Eighty-seven patients with traumatic syndesmotic injuries were retrospectively included for this study. Forty-four patients underwent mini fragment fixation and 43 patients underwent standard small fragment fixation. After-treatment was similar in both groups. Primary outcome consisted of the incidence of malreduction and secondary dislocation within three months. Secondary objectives were the incidence of the overall complication rate and implant removal rate. In total, malreduction was observed in three patients (3.4 %) and secondary dislocation in two patients (2.3 %), with no significant differences between the mini fragment and small fragment groups. Mini fragment fixation demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate (2.3 %) compared to the small fragment group (16.3 %)(p = .030). Implant removal rates were similar between the groups (27.3 % for mini fragment and 27.9 % for small fragment screws). This study suggests that both screw types are effective for fixation of acute syndesmotic injuries, with comparable malreduction and secondary dislocation rates. Prospective studies with longer follow-up, including functional outcome, are needed for comprehensive insights into optimal syndesmotic screw selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mini Fragment and Small Fragment Screws are Comparable in Acute Syndesmotic Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Stein B M van den Heuvel, Diederick Penning, Jens A Halm, Tim Schepers\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ankle fractures are often accompanied by syndesmotic injuries, contributing to instability and potential long term complications. Syndesmotic injuries are traditionally fixed with either small fragment (3.5-mm diameter) or large fragment (4.5-mm diameter) syndesmotic screws. With regards to the recent emergence of less prominent implants for ankle fracture, this study was set out to compare the outcomes of mini fragment screws (2.7-mm or 2.8-mm diameter) and small fragment screws in syndesmotic fixation. Eighty-seven patients with traumatic syndesmotic injuries were retrospectively included for this study. Forty-four patients underwent mini fragment fixation and 43 patients underwent standard small fragment fixation. After-treatment was similar in both groups. Primary outcome consisted of the incidence of malreduction and secondary dislocation within three months. Secondary objectives were the incidence of the overall complication rate and implant removal rate. In total, malreduction was observed in three patients (3.4 %) and secondary dislocation in two patients (2.3 %), with no significant differences between the mini fragment and small fragment groups. Mini fragment fixation demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate (2.3 %) compared to the small fragment group (16.3 %)(p = .030). Implant removal rates were similar between the groups (27.3 % for mini fragment and 27.9 % for small fragment screws). This study suggests that both screw types are effective for fixation of acute syndesmotic injuries, with comparable malreduction and secondary dislocation rates. Prospective studies with longer follow-up, including functional outcome, are needed for comprehensive insights into optimal syndesmotic screw selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

踝关节骨折常伴有韧带联合损伤,导致不稳定和潜在的长期并发症。传统上用小碎片(直径3.5 mm)或大碎片(直径4.5 mm)的韧带联合螺钉固定韧带联合损伤。针对最近出现的不太突出的踝关节骨折植入物,本研究比较了小碎片螺钉(直径2.7 mm或2.8 mm)和小碎片螺钉在关节联合固定中的效果。本研究回顾性分析了87例外伤性胫腓联合损伤患者。44例采用小碎片固定,43例采用标准小碎片固定。两组治疗后差异无统计学意义。主要结果包括三个月内复位不良和继发性脱位的发生率。次要目标是总体并发症发生率和种植体拔除率。总共有3例(3.4%)患者复位不良,2例(2.3%)患者继发脱位,迷你碎片组和小碎片组之间无显著差异。与小碎片组(16.3%)相比,迷你碎片固定组的总并发症发生率(2.3%)显著降低(p = .030)。两组间种植体移除率相似(小碎片螺钉为27.3%,小碎片螺钉为27.9%)。本研究表明,两种螺钉类型均可有效固定急性韧带联合损伤,复位不良和继发性脱位率相当。需要更长的随访期的前瞻性研究,包括功能结果,以全面了解最佳韧带联合螺钉选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mini Fragment and Small Fragment Screws are Comparable in Acute Syndesmotic Injury.

Ankle fractures are often accompanied by syndesmotic injuries, contributing to instability and potential long term complications. Syndesmotic injuries are traditionally fixed with either small fragment (3.5-mm diameter) or large fragment (4.5-mm diameter) syndesmotic screws. With regards to the recent emergence of less prominent implants for ankle fracture, this study was set out to compare the outcomes of mini fragment screws (2.7-mm or 2.8-mm diameter) and small fragment screws in syndesmotic fixation. Eighty-seven patients with traumatic syndesmotic injuries were retrospectively included for this study. Forty-four patients underwent mini fragment fixation and 43 patients underwent standard small fragment fixation. After-treatment was similar in both groups. Primary outcome consisted of the incidence of malreduction and secondary dislocation within three months. Secondary objectives were the incidence of the overall complication rate and implant removal rate. In total, malreduction was observed in three patients (3.4 %) and secondary dislocation in two patients (2.3 %), with no significant differences between the mini fragment and small fragment groups. Mini fragment fixation demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate (2.3 %) compared to the small fragment group (16.3 %)(p = .030). Implant removal rates were similar between the groups (27.3 % for mini fragment and 27.9 % for small fragment screws). This study suggests that both screw types are effective for fixation of acute syndesmotic injuries, with comparable malreduction and secondary dislocation rates. Prospective studies with longer follow-up, including functional outcome, are needed for comprehensive insights into optimal syndesmotic screw selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信