2型糖尿病发展的脊髓损伤特异性预后风险评估工具。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Katherine D Arnow, Alex H S Harris, Daniel S Logan, Kristen Davis-Lopez, Sherri LaVela, Susan Frayne, Justina Wu, Dan Eisenberg
{"title":"2型糖尿病发展的脊髓损伤特异性预后风险评估工具。","authors":"Katherine D Arnow, Alex H S Harris, Daniel S Logan, Kristen Davis-Lopez, Sherri LaVela, Susan Frayne, Justina Wu, Dan Eisenberg","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2434310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Available diabetes risk calculators were developed for able-bodied individuals, but their metabolic profile is different from individuals with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a diabetes risk assessment tool specific to individuals with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used national Veterans Affairs data to identify patients with at least a 2-year history of spinal cord injury and no prior history of diabetes with a Veterans Heath Affairs visit from 2005-2007, and followed the 11,054 individuals that met inclusion criteria for up to 17 years to assess diabetes development. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression to develop prognostic diabetes prediction models and evaluated these models on discrimination and calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2937 subjects developed diabetes during follow-up; median follow-up time was 8.7 years (IQR 3.3, 15.4). The first model selected 17 predictors and demonstrated median discrimination of 0.70 (IQR 0.69, 0.72) at 15 years. The second, more parsimonious model with 4 selected predictors demonstrated median discrimination of 0.69 (IQR 0.68, 0.71) at 15 years. Both models demonstrated good calibration across predicted risk, with better calibration in the 17-predictor model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These spinal cord injury-specific risk calculators can be used by both patients and providers in assessing risk of diabetes development, and in shared decision making regarding surveillance and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal cord injury-specific prognostic risk assessment tool for development of type 2 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine D Arnow, Alex H S Harris, Daniel S Logan, Kristen Davis-Lopez, Sherri LaVela, Susan Frayne, Justina Wu, Dan Eisenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2434310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Available diabetes risk calculators were developed for able-bodied individuals, but their metabolic profile is different from individuals with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a diabetes risk assessment tool specific to individuals with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used national Veterans Affairs data to identify patients with at least a 2-year history of spinal cord injury and no prior history of diabetes with a Veterans Heath Affairs visit from 2005-2007, and followed the 11,054 individuals that met inclusion criteria for up to 17 years to assess diabetes development. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression to develop prognostic diabetes prediction models and evaluated these models on discrimination and calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2937 subjects developed diabetes during follow-up; median follow-up time was 8.7 years (IQR 3.3, 15.4). The first model selected 17 predictors and demonstrated median discrimination of 0.70 (IQR 0.69, 0.72) at 15 years. The second, more parsimonious model with 4 selected predictors demonstrated median discrimination of 0.69 (IQR 0.68, 0.71) at 15 years. Both models demonstrated good calibration across predicted risk, with better calibration in the 17-predictor model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These spinal cord injury-specific risk calculators can be used by both patients and providers in assessing risk of diabetes development, and in shared decision making regarding surveillance and prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2434310\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2434310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现有的糖尿病风险计算器是为身体健全的个体开发的,但他们的代谢谱与脊髓损伤的个体不同。目的:我们旨在开发一种针对脊髓损伤个体的糖尿病风险评估工具。方法:我们使用国家退伍军人事务的数据,从2005-2007年退伍军人健康事务的访问中识别出至少有2年脊髓损伤史且没有糖尿病史的患者,并对11054名符合纳入标准的个体进行了长达17年的随访,以评估糖尿病的发展。我们使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO) Cox回归建立了糖尿病预后预测模型,并对这些模型进行了判别和校准评估。结果:2937名受试者在随访期间发生糖尿病;中位随访时间为8.7年(IQR 3.3, 15.4)。第一个模型选择了17个预测因子,15年的中位鉴别率为0.70 (IQR 0.69, 0.72)。第二种更简洁的模型有4个选定的预测因子,在15年时的中位鉴别率为0.69 (IQR为0.68,0.71)。两种模型在预测风险上都表现出良好的校准,其中17-predictor模型的校准效果更好。结论:这些脊髓损伤特异性风险计算器可用于患者和提供者评估糖尿病发展风险,并在监测和预防方面共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spinal cord injury-specific prognostic risk assessment tool for development of type 2 diabetes.

Context: Available diabetes risk calculators were developed for able-bodied individuals, but their metabolic profile is different from individuals with spinal cord injury.

Objectives: We aimed to develop a diabetes risk assessment tool specific to individuals with spinal cord injury.

Methods: We used national Veterans Affairs data to identify patients with at least a 2-year history of spinal cord injury and no prior history of diabetes with a Veterans Heath Affairs visit from 2005-2007, and followed the 11,054 individuals that met inclusion criteria for up to 17 years to assess diabetes development. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression to develop prognostic diabetes prediction models and evaluated these models on discrimination and calibration.

Results: 2937 subjects developed diabetes during follow-up; median follow-up time was 8.7 years (IQR 3.3, 15.4). The first model selected 17 predictors and demonstrated median discrimination of 0.70 (IQR 0.69, 0.72) at 15 years. The second, more parsimonious model with 4 selected predictors demonstrated median discrimination of 0.69 (IQR 0.68, 0.71) at 15 years. Both models demonstrated good calibration across predicted risk, with better calibration in the 17-predictor model.

Conclusion: These spinal cord injury-specific risk calculators can be used by both patients and providers in assessing risk of diabetes development, and in shared decision making regarding surveillance and prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信