Patient and caregiver experiences of palliative care co-management in oncology.

Objectives: Historically, patients with cancer were referred to palliative care near the end of life. In recent years, the increased integration of palliative care throughout the entire trajectory of illness has helped patients with cancer better manage their symptoms and improve QOL. However, it is unknown how patients think about the presence and role of earlier, integrated palliative care. This study explored how patients and caregivers experience cancer care in the context of palliative care co-management with oncology.

Methods: We conducted interviews with 18 patients and 13 caregivers to investigate perspectives, attitudes, and experiences surrounding cancer care, specifically with their experiences of co-management with a palliative care outpatient clinic and oncology. Using grounded theory, we identified a typology of patient and caregiver approaches when discussing the care they received and/or desired.

Results: Our data revealed 3 approaches to thinking about palliative care in cancer care. While some participants embraced the "Cure Centrality" approach, caring only about fighting the disease, others adopted a "Quality-of-Life (QOL) Centrality" approach, desiring their health-care team to prioritize a broader range of concerns. A third approach, The "Dual Centrality" approach, espoused values from both approaches.

Significance of results: While co-management of palliative care and oncology is complementary by design, our data suggest that patients and caregivers take a variety of approaches to their copresence. For some patients, palliative care served as an important legitimizing resource for patients desiring expanded priorities in their care (e.g. higher value on QOL and symptom management) and enabling patient-centered care.