原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤和胶质母细胞瘤在多部位全片图像上的弱监督病理分化。

IF 1.9 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.017502
Liping Wang, Lin Chen, Kaixi Wei, Huiyu Zhou, Reyer Zwiggelaar, Weiwei Fu, Yingchao Liu
{"title":"原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤和胶质母细胞瘤在多部位全片图像上的弱监督病理分化。","authors":"Liping Wang, Lin Chen, Kaixi Wei, Huiyu Zhou, Reyer Zwiggelaar, Weiwei Fu, Yingchao Liu","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.017502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) is crucial because their prognosis and treatment differ substantially. Manual examination of their histological characteristics is considered the golden standard in clinical diagnosis. However, this process is tedious and time-consuming and might lead to misdiagnosis caused by morphological similarity between their histology and tumor heterogeneity. Existing research focuses on radiological differentiation, which mostly uses multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. By contrast, we investigate the pathological differentiation between the two types of tumors using whole slide images (WSIs) of postoperative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>To learn the specific and intrinsic histological feature representations from the WSI patches, a self-supervised feature extractor is trained. Then, the patch representations are fused by feeding into a weakly supervised multiple-instance learning model for the WSI classification. We validate our approach on 134 PCNSL and 526 GBM cases collected from three hospitals. We also investigate the effect of feature extraction on the final prediction by comparing the performance of applying the feature extractors trained on the PCNSL/GBM slides from specific institutions, multi-site PCNSL/GBM slides, and large-scale histopathological images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Different feature extractors perform comparably with the overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value exceeding 85% for each dataset and close to 95% for the combined multi-site dataset. Using the institution-specific feature extractors generally obtains the best overall prediction with both of the PCNSL and GBM classification accuracies reaching 80% for each dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The excellent classification performance suggests that our approach can be used as an assistant tool to reduce the pathologists' workload by providing an accurate and objective second diagnosis. Moreover, the discriminant regions indicated by the generated attention heatmap improve the model interpretability and provide additional diagnostic information.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"12 1","pages":"017502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weakly supervised pathological differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma on multi-site whole slide images.\",\"authors\":\"Liping Wang, Lin Chen, Kaixi Wei, Huiyu Zhou, Reyer Zwiggelaar, Weiwei Fu, Yingchao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.017502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) is crucial because their prognosis and treatment differ substantially. Manual examination of their histological characteristics is considered the golden standard in clinical diagnosis. However, this process is tedious and time-consuming and might lead to misdiagnosis caused by morphological similarity between their histology and tumor heterogeneity. Existing research focuses on radiological differentiation, which mostly uses multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. By contrast, we investigate the pathological differentiation between the two types of tumors using whole slide images (WSIs) of postoperative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>To learn the specific and intrinsic histological feature representations from the WSI patches, a self-supervised feature extractor is trained. Then, the patch representations are fused by feeding into a weakly supervised multiple-instance learning model for the WSI classification. We validate our approach on 134 PCNSL and 526 GBM cases collected from three hospitals. We also investigate the effect of feature extraction on the final prediction by comparing the performance of applying the feature extractors trained on the PCNSL/GBM slides from specific institutions, multi-site PCNSL/GBM slides, and large-scale histopathological images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Different feature extractors perform comparably with the overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value exceeding 85% for each dataset and close to 95% for the combined multi-site dataset. Using the institution-specific feature extractors generally obtains the best overall prediction with both of the PCNSL and GBM classification accuracies reaching 80% for each dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The excellent classification performance suggests that our approach can be used as an assistant tool to reduce the pathologists' workload by providing an accurate and objective second diagnosis. Moreover, the discriminant regions indicated by the generated attention heatmap improve the model interpretability and provide additional diagnostic information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"017502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.017502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.017502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)和胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的预后和治疗有很大的不同,因此鉴别它们至关重要。手工检查其组织学特征被认为是临床诊断的黄金标准。然而,这一过程繁琐且耗时,且可能因其组织形态相似性和肿瘤异质性而导致误诊。现有的研究主要集中在放射学鉴别,多采用多参数磁共振成像。相比之下,我们使用术后福尔马林固定石蜡包埋样本的全切片图像(WSIs)来研究两种肿瘤的病理分化。方法:为了从WSI补丁中学习特定的和内在的组织学特征表示,训练了一个自监督特征提取器。然后,将patch表示融合到用于WSI分类的弱监督多实例学习模型中。我们对来自三家医院的134例PCNSL和526例GBM病例进行了验证。我们还通过比较在特定机构的PCNSL/GBM载玻片、多位点PCNSL/GBM载玻片和大规模组织病理图像上应用训练的特征提取器的性能,研究了特征提取对最终预测的影响。结果:不同的特征提取器表现比较好,每个数据集的接收者工作特征曲线值下的总体面积超过85%,组合的多站点数据集接近95%。使用机构特征提取器通常可以获得最佳的整体预测,每个数据集的PCNSL和GBM分类准确率均达到80%。结论:该方法具有良好的分类性能,可作为辅助工具,提供准确、客观的二次诊断,减少病理医师的工作量。此外,由生成的注意力热图指示的判别区域提高了模型的可解释性,并提供了额外的诊断信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weakly supervised pathological differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma on multi-site whole slide images.

Purpose: Differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) is crucial because their prognosis and treatment differ substantially. Manual examination of their histological characteristics is considered the golden standard in clinical diagnosis. However, this process is tedious and time-consuming and might lead to misdiagnosis caused by morphological similarity between their histology and tumor heterogeneity. Existing research focuses on radiological differentiation, which mostly uses multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. By contrast, we investigate the pathological differentiation between the two types of tumors using whole slide images (WSIs) of postoperative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples.

Approach: To learn the specific and intrinsic histological feature representations from the WSI patches, a self-supervised feature extractor is trained. Then, the patch representations are fused by feeding into a weakly supervised multiple-instance learning model for the WSI classification. We validate our approach on 134 PCNSL and 526 GBM cases collected from three hospitals. We also investigate the effect of feature extraction on the final prediction by comparing the performance of applying the feature extractors trained on the PCNSL/GBM slides from specific institutions, multi-site PCNSL/GBM slides, and large-scale histopathological images.

Results: Different feature extractors perform comparably with the overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value exceeding 85% for each dataset and close to 95% for the combined multi-site dataset. Using the institution-specific feature extractors generally obtains the best overall prediction with both of the PCNSL and GBM classification accuracies reaching 80% for each dataset.

Conclusions: The excellent classification performance suggests that our approach can be used as an assistant tool to reduce the pathologists' workload by providing an accurate and objective second diagnosis. Moreover, the discriminant regions indicated by the generated attention heatmap improve the model interpretability and provide additional diagnostic information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging
Journal of Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信