Ayla J Goktan, Hannah K Heitz, Fei Bi Chan, Stephanie Chin, Millicent Cahoon, Jody Zhong
{"title":"我们来谈谈班级:一个为心理治疗学员开设的点对点的社会班级研讨会。","authors":"Ayla J Goktan, Hannah K Heitz, Fei Bi Chan, Stephanie Chin, Millicent Cahoon, Jody Zhong","doi":"10.1037/pst0000559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing consensus that effective psychotherapists and counselors require antioppressive, social-justice-oriented, culturally and structurally responsive training (e.g., Neville et al., 2021; Singh, 2020; Vera & Speight, 2003). The field has a long way to go to answer this call (Wilcox et al., 2024), including with social class topics (Liu, 2012) and peer-to-peer initiatives (Stigmar, 2016). Thus, the current qualitative study examined five student facilitators' perspectives on a counseling psychology graduate program's antioppressive peer-to-peer social class workshop (SCW). The SCW was originally grounded in the Social Class Worldview Model-Revised (Liu, 2012) and the multicultural orientation (MCO) framework (Davis et al., 2018) and later incorporated ideas from liberation psychology (Comas-Díaz & Torres Rivera, 2020) and decolonial pedagogies (Goodman et al., 2015). To illuminate the factors that affect student facilitators' SCW experiences, and how this work can inform culturally and structurally responsive psychotherapy training more broadly, we collected student facilitators' collaborative autoethnographic reflections. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we constructed two core themes: (a) nurturing growth: ingredients and orientations and (b) navigating barriers: oppressive structures manifest at multiple levels. Even as student facilitators acknowledged ways that they and the SCW fell short, they remained optimistic about growth both achieved and hoped for. We discuss limitations and implications for the promotion of peer-to-peer and/or social class initiatives in psychotherapy training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let's talk about class: A peer-to-peer social class workshop for psychotherapy trainees.\",\"authors\":\"Ayla J Goktan, Hannah K Heitz, Fei Bi Chan, Stephanie Chin, Millicent Cahoon, Jody Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pst0000559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a growing consensus that effective psychotherapists and counselors require antioppressive, social-justice-oriented, culturally and structurally responsive training (e.g., Neville et al., 2021; Singh, 2020; Vera & Speight, 2003). The field has a long way to go to answer this call (Wilcox et al., 2024), including with social class topics (Liu, 2012) and peer-to-peer initiatives (Stigmar, 2016). Thus, the current qualitative study examined five student facilitators' perspectives on a counseling psychology graduate program's antioppressive peer-to-peer social class workshop (SCW). The SCW was originally grounded in the Social Class Worldview Model-Revised (Liu, 2012) and the multicultural orientation (MCO) framework (Davis et al., 2018) and later incorporated ideas from liberation psychology (Comas-Díaz & Torres Rivera, 2020) and decolonial pedagogies (Goodman et al., 2015). To illuminate the factors that affect student facilitators' SCW experiences, and how this work can inform culturally and structurally responsive psychotherapy training more broadly, we collected student facilitators' collaborative autoethnographic reflections. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we constructed two core themes: (a) nurturing growth: ingredients and orientations and (b) navigating barriers: oppressive structures manifest at multiple levels. Even as student facilitators acknowledged ways that they and the SCW fell short, they remained optimistic about growth both achieved and hoped for. We discuss limitations and implications for the promotion of peer-to-peer and/or social class initiatives in psychotherapy training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000559\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000559","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
越来越多的人认为,有效的心理治疗师和咨询师需要反压迫、社会正义导向、文化和结构响应的培训(例如,Neville等人,2021;辛格,2020;Vera & Speight, 2003)。要回答这一呼吁,该领域还有很长的路要走(Wilcox et al., 2024),包括社会阶层主题(Liu, 2012)和点对点倡议(Stigmar, 2016)。因此,目前的定性研究考察了五名学生辅导员对咨询心理学研究生项目的反压迫点对点社会阶层研讨会(SCW)的看法。SCW最初以社会阶级世界观模型修正(Liu, 2012)和多元文化取向(MCO)框架(Davis等人,2018)为基础,后来纳入了解放心理学(Comas-Díaz & Torres Rivera, 2020)和非殖民化教育学(Goodman等人,2015)的思想。为了阐明影响学生辅导员SCW体验的因素,以及这项工作如何更广泛地为文化和结构反应性心理治疗培训提供信息,我们收集了学生辅导员的协作性自我民族志反思。利用反身性主题分析,我们构建了两个核心主题:(a)培育增长:成分和方向;(b)克服障碍:压迫性结构在多个层面上表现出来。尽管学生辅导员承认他们和SCW在某些方面存在不足,但他们对已经实现和希望实现的增长仍持乐观态度。我们讨论了在心理治疗培训中促进对等和/或社会阶层倡议的局限性和意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Let's talk about class: A peer-to-peer social class workshop for psychotherapy trainees.
There is a growing consensus that effective psychotherapists and counselors require antioppressive, social-justice-oriented, culturally and structurally responsive training (e.g., Neville et al., 2021; Singh, 2020; Vera & Speight, 2003). The field has a long way to go to answer this call (Wilcox et al., 2024), including with social class topics (Liu, 2012) and peer-to-peer initiatives (Stigmar, 2016). Thus, the current qualitative study examined five student facilitators' perspectives on a counseling psychology graduate program's antioppressive peer-to-peer social class workshop (SCW). The SCW was originally grounded in the Social Class Worldview Model-Revised (Liu, 2012) and the multicultural orientation (MCO) framework (Davis et al., 2018) and later incorporated ideas from liberation psychology (Comas-Díaz & Torres Rivera, 2020) and decolonial pedagogies (Goodman et al., 2015). To illuminate the factors that affect student facilitators' SCW experiences, and how this work can inform culturally and structurally responsive psychotherapy training more broadly, we collected student facilitators' collaborative autoethnographic reflections. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we constructed two core themes: (a) nurturing growth: ingredients and orientations and (b) navigating barriers: oppressive structures manifest at multiple levels. Even as student facilitators acknowledged ways that they and the SCW fell short, they remained optimistic about growth both achieved and hoped for. We discuss limitations and implications for the promotion of peer-to-peer and/or social class initiatives in psychotherapy training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.