在家自行采集生物样本,包括阴道拭子:英国第四次全国性态度和生活方式调查(Natsal-4)的混合方法研究。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Clarissa Oeser, Pam Sonnenberg, Magnus Unemo, Katharine Sadler, Soazig Clifton, Jo Gibbs, Simon Beddows, Rebecca Hamilton, Abraham Roodt, Stephanie Migchelsen, Emily Dema, Alexandra David, Catherine H Mercer, Nigel Field
{"title":"在家自行采集生物样本,包括阴道拭子:英国第四次全国性态度和生活方式调查(Natsal-4)的混合方法研究。","authors":"Clarissa Oeser, Pam Sonnenberg, Magnus Unemo, Katharine Sadler, Soazig Clifton, Jo Gibbs, Simon Beddows, Rebecca Hamilton, Abraham Roodt, Stephanie Migchelsen, Emily Dema, Alexandra David, Catherine H Mercer, Nigel Field","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2024-056386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The decennial National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal) provide general population prevalence estimates in Britain for key sexually transmitted infections (STIs) through biosampling. Since methodological choices can impact acceptability and response rates, we evaluated processes for Natsal-4, including face-to-face and remote interview arrangements, non-return of test results and vaginal swab collection in two pilot studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The pilots were conducted during June to August 2021 and February to March 2022. Participants aged 16-59 years were invited to provide urine samples (cisgender men and trans/gender diverse) or three vaginal swabs (cisgender women; urine was requested if vaginal swabs were declined) following interview. Samples were self-collected at home and posted to the laboratory by the interviewer if the interview was face to face, or by the participant if they preferred to collect the sample later or the interview was remote. Process feedback was collected after the first pilot via qualitative interviews with participants and after both pilots through informal interviewer debriefing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 261 participants interviewed (pilot 1=130; pilot 2=131), 161 (62%) consented to biosampling, of which 129 (49%) provided samples. A sample was received from 78/153 (51%) of women, of whom 60 (77%) provided vaginal swabs and 18 (23%) provided a urine sample. A urine sample was received from 51/108 (47%) cisgender men or trans/gender diverse participants. All samples collected immediately after face-to-face interviews were received (n=77), while 64% of samples from participants consenting to post samples after face-to-face interviews and 60% after remote interviews were received. Process feedback confirmed our methods were broadly acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated that our approach to biosampling and STI testing for a national sexual health survey was reasonably acceptable and feasible in the period coming out the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-collection of vaginal swabs for research, which provide higher testing sensitivity than urine, was feasible and acceptable in a home setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":21624,"journal":{"name":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home-based self-collection of biological samples, including vaginal swabs: a mixed methods study for Britain's fourth National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-4).\",\"authors\":\"Clarissa Oeser, Pam Sonnenberg, Magnus Unemo, Katharine Sadler, Soazig Clifton, Jo Gibbs, Simon Beddows, Rebecca Hamilton, Abraham Roodt, Stephanie Migchelsen, Emily Dema, Alexandra David, Catherine H Mercer, Nigel Field\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/sextrans-2024-056386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The decennial National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal) provide general population prevalence estimates in Britain for key sexually transmitted infections (STIs) through biosampling. Since methodological choices can impact acceptability and response rates, we evaluated processes for Natsal-4, including face-to-face and remote interview arrangements, non-return of test results and vaginal swab collection in two pilot studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The pilots were conducted during June to August 2021 and February to March 2022. Participants aged 16-59 years were invited to provide urine samples (cisgender men and trans/gender diverse) or three vaginal swabs (cisgender women; urine was requested if vaginal swabs were declined) following interview. Samples were self-collected at home and posted to the laboratory by the interviewer if the interview was face to face, or by the participant if they preferred to collect the sample later or the interview was remote. Process feedback was collected after the first pilot via qualitative interviews with participants and after both pilots through informal interviewer debriefing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 261 participants interviewed (pilot 1=130; pilot 2=131), 161 (62%) consented to biosampling, of which 129 (49%) provided samples. A sample was received from 78/153 (51%) of women, of whom 60 (77%) provided vaginal swabs and 18 (23%) provided a urine sample. A urine sample was received from 51/108 (47%) cisgender men or trans/gender diverse participants. All samples collected immediately after face-to-face interviews were received (n=77), while 64% of samples from participants consenting to post samples after face-to-face interviews and 60% after remote interviews were received. Process feedback confirmed our methods were broadly acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated that our approach to biosampling and STI testing for a national sexual health survey was reasonably acceptable and feasible in the period coming out the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-collection of vaginal swabs for research, which provide higher testing sensitivity than urine, was feasible and acceptable in a home setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056386\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056386","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:十年一次的国家性态度和生活方式调查(Natsal)通过生物采样提供了英国主要性传播感染(STIs)的一般人群患病率估计。由于方法选择会影响可接受性和回复率,我们在两项试点研究中评估了Natsal-4的流程,包括面对面和远程访谈安排、不返回测试结果和阴道拭子收集。方法:分别于2021年6月~ 8月和2022年2月~ 3月进行试点。年龄16-59岁的参与者被邀请提供尿液样本(顺性男性和跨性别/变性人)或三个阴道拭子(顺性女性;如果拒绝阴道拭子,则要求在面试后提供尿液。如果面试是面对面的,则由面试者在家中自行收集样本,如果面试是远程的,则由参与者自行收集样本并邮寄到实验室。在第一次试点结束后,通过对参与者的定性访谈收集过程反馈,在两次试点结束后,通过非正式面试官汇报收集过程反馈。结果:261名参与者接受访谈(飞行员1=130;试点2=131),161人(62%)同意生物采样,其中129人(49%)提供了样本。153名妇女中有78名(51%)提供了样本,其中60名(77%)提供了阴道拭子,18名(23%)提供了尿液样本。收到了51/108(47%)名顺性别男性或跨性别/不同性别参与者的尿液样本。面对面访谈后立即收集的所有样本均被接收(n=77),而64%的参与者同意在面对面访谈后发送样本,60%的参与者同意在远程访谈后发送样本。过程反馈确认我们的方法被广泛接受。结论:我们证明,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,我们在全国性健康调查中采用的生物采样和性传播感染检测方法是合理可接受和可行的。自行收集阴道拭子进行研究,比尿液提供更高的检测灵敏度,在家庭环境中是可行和可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home-based self-collection of biological samples, including vaginal swabs: a mixed methods study for Britain's fourth National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-4).

Objectives: The decennial National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal) provide general population prevalence estimates in Britain for key sexually transmitted infections (STIs) through biosampling. Since methodological choices can impact acceptability and response rates, we evaluated processes for Natsal-4, including face-to-face and remote interview arrangements, non-return of test results and vaginal swab collection in two pilot studies.

Methods: The pilots were conducted during June to August 2021 and February to March 2022. Participants aged 16-59 years were invited to provide urine samples (cisgender men and trans/gender diverse) or three vaginal swabs (cisgender women; urine was requested if vaginal swabs were declined) following interview. Samples were self-collected at home and posted to the laboratory by the interviewer if the interview was face to face, or by the participant if they preferred to collect the sample later or the interview was remote. Process feedback was collected after the first pilot via qualitative interviews with participants and after both pilots through informal interviewer debriefing.

Results: Of 261 participants interviewed (pilot 1=130; pilot 2=131), 161 (62%) consented to biosampling, of which 129 (49%) provided samples. A sample was received from 78/153 (51%) of women, of whom 60 (77%) provided vaginal swabs and 18 (23%) provided a urine sample. A urine sample was received from 51/108 (47%) cisgender men or trans/gender diverse participants. All samples collected immediately after face-to-face interviews were received (n=77), while 64% of samples from participants consenting to post samples after face-to-face interviews and 60% after remote interviews were received. Process feedback confirmed our methods were broadly acceptable.

Conclusions: We demonstrated that our approach to biosampling and STI testing for a national sexual health survey was reasonably acceptable and feasible in the period coming out the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-collection of vaginal swabs for research, which provide higher testing sensitivity than urine, was feasible and acceptable in a home setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Sexually Transmitted Infections 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexually Transmitted Infections is the world’s longest running international journal on sexual health. It aims to keep practitioners, trainees and researchers up to date in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all STIs and HIV. The journal publishes original research, descriptive epidemiology, evidence-based reviews and comment on the clinical, public health, sociological and laboratory aspects of sexual health from around the world. We also publish educational articles, letters and other material of interest to readers, along with podcasts and other online material. STI provides a high quality editorial service from submission to publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信