用笔给胰岛素与用小瓶/注射器给胰岛素患者的满意度。一项观察性前瞻性研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S491944
Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo, Ana Camila Delgado-Araujo, María Camila Oyuela-Gutiérrez, Harrison David Ospina-Arzuaga, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba
{"title":"用笔给胰岛素与用小瓶/注射器给胰岛素患者的满意度。一项观察性前瞻性研究。","authors":"Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo, Ana Camila Delgado-Araujo, María Camila Oyuela-Gutiérrez, Harrison David Ospina-Arzuaga, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S491944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the satisfaction of patients with diabetes mellitus who used subcutaneous insulin application devices in Colombia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An observational prospective study of patients with diabetes mellitus receiving insulin treatment in Colombia. Sociodemographic, comorbidity and pharmacological data were taken from a drug dispensing database. Through telephone calls, satisfaction with application devices was evaluated with Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQ-s). Satisfaction was considered high at a score ≥30 points. The change in the type of insulin delivery device (ie, from pen to vial/syringe, and from vial/syringe to pen) was evaluated during a 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 382 patients from 75 cities were selected, with a median age of 66.0 years, and 56.3% were women, and 65.2% were treated with long-acting insulins. The mean DTSQ-s score was 26.6±5.3 points, and 38.7% presented high satisfaction, without statistically significant differences between pen and vial/syringe. A total of 18.8% changed the administration device, mainly those that came from Bogotá-Cundinamarca (OR:2.19; 95% CI:1.01-4.75), in concomitant treatment with other antidiabetic drugs (OR:2.28; 95% CI:1.00-5.22) and those who previously used insulin in vial/syringe (OR:33.90; 95% CI:11.88-96.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The participants had low satisfaction with the insulin delivery device. No statistically significant differences were found in satisfaction between those who received pen vs vial/syringe insulin, and patients using the latter had a high probability of switching to insulin pen.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Level of Satisfaction Among Patients Using Insulin Administered by Pen vs Vial/Syringe. An Observational Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo, Ana Camila Delgado-Araujo, María Camila Oyuela-Gutiérrez, Harrison David Ospina-Arzuaga, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S491944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the satisfaction of patients with diabetes mellitus who used subcutaneous insulin application devices in Colombia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An observational prospective study of patients with diabetes mellitus receiving insulin treatment in Colombia. Sociodemographic, comorbidity and pharmacological data were taken from a drug dispensing database. Through telephone calls, satisfaction with application devices was evaluated with Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQ-s). Satisfaction was considered high at a score ≥30 points. The change in the type of insulin delivery device (ie, from pen to vial/syringe, and from vial/syringe to pen) was evaluated during a 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 382 patients from 75 cities were selected, with a median age of 66.0 years, and 56.3% were women, and 65.2% were treated with long-acting insulins. The mean DTSQ-s score was 26.6±5.3 points, and 38.7% presented high satisfaction, without statistically significant differences between pen and vial/syringe. A total of 18.8% changed the administration device, mainly those that came from Bogotá-Cundinamarca (OR:2.19; 95% CI:1.01-4.75), in concomitant treatment with other antidiabetic drugs (OR:2.28; 95% CI:1.00-5.22) and those who previously used insulin in vial/syringe (OR:33.90; 95% CI:11.88-96.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The participants had low satisfaction with the insulin delivery device. No statistically significant differences were found in satisfaction between those who received pen vs vial/syringe insulin, and patients using the latter had a high probability of switching to insulin pen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"65-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S491944\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S491944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解哥伦比亚糖尿病患者使用皮下胰岛素应用装置的满意度。患者和方法:对哥伦比亚接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者进行观察性前瞻性研究。社会人口学、合并症和药理学数据取自药品调剂数据库。通过电话访谈,采用糖尿病治疗满意度问卷状态版(DTSQ-s)评估患者对应用设备的满意度。满意度≥30分为高。在1年的随访中评估胰岛素输送装置类型的变化(即从笔到小瓶/注射器,从小瓶/注射器到笔)。结果:共入选75个城市382例患者,中位年龄66.0岁,女性占56.3%,使用长效胰岛素的患者占65.2%。平均DTSQ-s评分为26.6±5.3分,38.7%的患者满意度较高,笔与瓶/注射器之间差异无统计学意义。共有18.8%的人改变了管理设备,主要来自Bogotá-Cundinamarca (OR:2.19;95% CI:1.01-4.75),与其他降糖药联合治疗(OR:2.28;95% CI:1.00-5.22)和以前在小瓶/注射器中使用胰岛素的患者(OR:33.90;95%置信区间:11.88—-96.74)。结论:受试者对胰岛素输送装置的满意度较低。在接受笔式胰岛素和小瓶/注射器胰岛素的患者之间,满意度没有统计学上的显著差异,使用后者的患者很有可能改用胰岛素笔式胰岛素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Level of Satisfaction Among Patients Using Insulin Administered by Pen vs Vial/Syringe. An Observational Prospective Study.

Purpose: To determine the satisfaction of patients with diabetes mellitus who used subcutaneous insulin application devices in Colombia.

Patients and methods: An observational prospective study of patients with diabetes mellitus receiving insulin treatment in Colombia. Sociodemographic, comorbidity and pharmacological data were taken from a drug dispensing database. Through telephone calls, satisfaction with application devices was evaluated with Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQ-s). Satisfaction was considered high at a score ≥30 points. The change in the type of insulin delivery device (ie, from pen to vial/syringe, and from vial/syringe to pen) was evaluated during a 1-year follow-up.

Results: A total of 382 patients from 75 cities were selected, with a median age of 66.0 years, and 56.3% were women, and 65.2% were treated with long-acting insulins. The mean DTSQ-s score was 26.6±5.3 points, and 38.7% presented high satisfaction, without statistically significant differences between pen and vial/syringe. A total of 18.8% changed the administration device, mainly those that came from Bogotá-Cundinamarca (OR:2.19; 95% CI:1.01-4.75), in concomitant treatment with other antidiabetic drugs (OR:2.28; 95% CI:1.00-5.22) and those who previously used insulin in vial/syringe (OR:33.90; 95% CI:11.88-96.74).

Conclusion: The participants had low satisfaction with the insulin delivery device. No statistically significant differences were found in satisfaction between those who received pen vs vial/syringe insulin, and patients using the latter had a high probability of switching to insulin pen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信