Return to sports after pediatric traumatic brain injury: An expert panel survey.

Background: There are no evidence based guidelines for clinicians to follow in advising pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) on return to play (RTP).

Objective: To understand practice patterns of experts in pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) in relation to how they assess severity of TBI and guide return to play (RTP) decisions with their patients who sustain complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI.

Design: Cross-sectional web-based survey.

Setting: Not applicable.

Participants: Thirty experts (defined by attesting to their clinical management of children with TBI and demonstrating a history of publication in the area of pediatric TBI including mild TBI) represented by physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurosurgery, sports medicine, and neuropsychology. Fifty-five candidates were invited, 37 responded (67% response rate), and 30 were eligible to participate.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measure(s): Ratings of agreement as to the relative importance of a variety of factors used to assess initial severity of injury as well as to measure recovery. RTP timelines were measured for different scenarios (adjusted by level of risk of activity returned to and the severity of initial injury sustained). Finally, ratings of agreement with various factors that could influence their RTP decision making as well as a free text option.

Results: Recommendations on RTP timing varied significantly based on risk of activity returned to for all levels of TBI severity (p < .05). There was large variability of RTP timeline for any given level of injury severity. There was no significant association between medical specialty and RTP recommendations. Experts also noted a variety of factors which may inform their RTP decision making, many with high agreement.

Conclusions: These results can inform clinicians who care for these patients in their own RTP decision making. The description of these RTP trends, in combination with the variability seen in both severity determination and recovery assessment, highlight the importance of further study of outcomes related to RTP and the eventual development of standardized guidelines for this patient population.