牙周炎中微生物来源的生物标志物的诊断准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anbo Dong, Gordon Proctor, Svetislav Zaric
{"title":"牙周炎中微生物来源的生物标志物的诊断准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Anbo Dong, Gordon Proctor, Svetislav Zaric","doi":"10.1111/jre.13377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of microbiome-derived biomarkers for periodontitis in oral fluids (saliva and subgingival samples).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were performed across multiple databases from December 2022 to November 2024. Subgroup analyses, divided into saliva and subgingival samples, were performed using the Random Effects Model (REM), while individual biomarker sensitivity and specificity were evaluated through the Bivariate Random-Effects Model (BREM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included, stratified by sample type. In the saliva group, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia and Prevotella intermedia demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivities reaching 89.2%, 89.2% and 86.5%, and specificities of 94.6%, 86.5% and 83.8%, respectively, achieving AUC values above 0.80. Porphyromonas gingivalis was further analysed using BREM, with the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve indicating a combined sensitivity and specificity of 84.2% and 85.4%, with an AUC of 0.864. In the subgingival group, biomarkers such as endotoxin activity and combined bacterial biomarkers (5 bacterial species) displayed the highest diagnostic performance, with sensitivities of 90.6% and 85.1% and specificities of 87.9% and 100%, respectively, and AUC values of 0.93 and 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microbiome-derived biomarkers show good clinical utility for improving diagnoses of periodontitis, offering high specificity and sensitivity. Future research should focus on standardising methodologies, increasing sample sizes, and including diverse populations to validate these findings, thereby improving diagnostic precision and facilitating the screening methods for the onset of periodontitis and dysbiotic activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontal research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Microbiome-Derived Biomarkers in Periodontitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anbo Dong, Gordon Proctor, Svetislav Zaric\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jre.13377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of microbiome-derived biomarkers for periodontitis in oral fluids (saliva and subgingival samples).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were performed across multiple databases from December 2022 to November 2024. Subgroup analyses, divided into saliva and subgingival samples, were performed using the Random Effects Model (REM), while individual biomarker sensitivity and specificity were evaluated through the Bivariate Random-Effects Model (BREM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included, stratified by sample type. In the saliva group, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia and Prevotella intermedia demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivities reaching 89.2%, 89.2% and 86.5%, and specificities of 94.6%, 86.5% and 83.8%, respectively, achieving AUC values above 0.80. Porphyromonas gingivalis was further analysed using BREM, with the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve indicating a combined sensitivity and specificity of 84.2% and 85.4%, with an AUC of 0.864. In the subgingival group, biomarkers such as endotoxin activity and combined bacterial biomarkers (5 bacterial species) displayed the highest diagnostic performance, with sensitivities of 90.6% and 85.1% and specificities of 87.9% and 100%, respectively, and AUC values of 0.93 and 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microbiome-derived biomarkers show good clinical utility for improving diagnoses of periodontitis, offering high specificity and sensitivity. Future research should focus on standardising methodologies, increasing sample sizes, and including diverse populations to validate these findings, thereby improving diagnostic precision and facilitating the screening methods for the onset of periodontitis and dysbiotic activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of periodontal research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of periodontal research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13377\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontal research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价口腔液体(唾液和龈下样本)中微生物来源的生物标志物对牙周炎的诊断准确性。方法:本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南。从2022年12月到2024年11月,在多个数据库中进行了电子搜索。使用随机效应模型(REM)进行亚组分析,分为唾液和牙龈下样本,而通过双变量随机效应模型(BREM)评估个体生物标志物的敏感性和特异性。结果:纳入10项研究,按样本类型分层。在唾液组中,牙龈卟啉单胞菌、连翘单宁菌和中间普雷沃菌的诊断准确率最高,敏感性分别达到89.2%、89.2%和86.5%,特异性分别达到94.6%、86.5%和83.8%,AUC值均在0.80以上。进一步采用BREM对牙龈卟啉单胞菌进行分析,SROC曲线的敏感性和特异性分别为84.2%和85.4%,AUC为0.864。在龈下组,内毒素活性和联合细菌生物标志物(5种细菌)的诊断效能最高,敏感性分别为90.6%和85.1%,特异性分别为87.9%和100%,AUC值分别为0.93和0.88。结论:微生物组衍生的生物标志物具有较高的特异性和敏感性,在改善牙周炎诊断方面具有良好的临床应用价值。未来的研究应侧重于标准化方法,增加样本量,并包括不同的人群来验证这些发现,从而提高诊断精度,促进牙周炎发病和益生菌活性不良的筛查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Microbiome-Derived Biomarkers in Periodontitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of microbiome-derived biomarkers for periodontitis in oral fluids (saliva and subgingival samples).

Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were performed across multiple databases from December 2022 to November 2024. Subgroup analyses, divided into saliva and subgingival samples, were performed using the Random Effects Model (REM), while individual biomarker sensitivity and specificity were evaluated through the Bivariate Random-Effects Model (BREM).

Results: Ten studies were included, stratified by sample type. In the saliva group, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia and Prevotella intermedia demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivities reaching 89.2%, 89.2% and 86.5%, and specificities of 94.6%, 86.5% and 83.8%, respectively, achieving AUC values above 0.80. Porphyromonas gingivalis was further analysed using BREM, with the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve indicating a combined sensitivity and specificity of 84.2% and 85.4%, with an AUC of 0.864. In the subgingival group, biomarkers such as endotoxin activity and combined bacterial biomarkers (5 bacterial species) displayed the highest diagnostic performance, with sensitivities of 90.6% and 85.1% and specificities of 87.9% and 100%, respectively, and AUC values of 0.93 and 0.88.

Conclusion: Microbiome-derived biomarkers show good clinical utility for improving diagnoses of periodontitis, offering high specificity and sensitivity. Future research should focus on standardising methodologies, increasing sample sizes, and including diverse populations to validate these findings, thereby improving diagnostic precision and facilitating the screening methods for the onset of periodontitis and dysbiotic activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of periodontal research
Journal of periodontal research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontal Research is an international research periodical the purpose of which is to publish original clinical and basic investigations and review articles concerned with every aspect of periodontology and related sciences. Brief communications (1-3 journal pages) are also accepted and a special effort is made to ensure their rapid publication. Reports of scientific meetings in periodontology and related fields are also published. One volume of six issues is published annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信