女人真的(不是)比男人更健谈吗?一篇关于日常词汇使用中二元性别异同的记录报告。

IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Colin A Tidwell, Alexander F Danvers, Valeria A Pfeifer, Danielle B Abel, Eva Alisic, Andrew Beer, Sabrina J Bierstetel, Kathryn L Bollich-Ziegler, Michelle Bruni, William R Calabrese, Christine Chiarello, Burcu Demiray, Sona Dimidjian, Karen L Fingerman, Maximilian Haas, Deanna M Kaplan, Yijung K Kim, Goran Knezevic, Ljiljana B Lazarevic, Minxia Luo, Alessandra Macbeth, Joseph H Manson, Jennifer S Mascaro, Christina Metcalf, Kyle S Minor, Suzanne Moseley, Angelina J Polsinelli, Charles L Raison, James K Rilling, Megan L Robbins, David Sbarra, Richard B Slatcher, Jessie Sun, Mira Vasileva, Simine Vazire, Matthias R Mehl
{"title":"女人真的(不是)比男人更健谈吗?一篇关于日常词汇使用中二元性别异同的记录报告。","authors":"Colin A Tidwell, Alexander F Danvers, Valeria A Pfeifer, Danielle B Abel, Eva Alisic, Andrew Beer, Sabrina J Bierstetel, Kathryn L Bollich-Ziegler, Michelle Bruni, William R Calabrese, Christine Chiarello, Burcu Demiray, Sona Dimidjian, Karen L Fingerman, Maximilian Haas, Deanna M Kaplan, Yijung K Kim, Goran Knezevic, Ljiljana B Lazarevic, Minxia Luo, Alessandra Macbeth, Joseph H Manson, Jennifer S Mascaro, Christina Metcalf, Kyle S Minor, Suzanne Moseley, Angelina J Polsinelli, Charles L Raison, James K Rilling, Megan L Robbins, David Sbarra, Richard B Slatcher, Jessie Sun, Mira Vasileva, Simine Vazire, Matthias R Mehl","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women are widely assumed to be more talkative than men. Challenging this assumption, Mehl et al. (2007) provided empirical evidence that men and women do not differ significantly in their daily word use, speaking about 16,000 words per day (WPD) each. However, concerns were raised that their sample was too small to yield generalizable estimates and too age and context homogeneous to permit inferences beyond college students. This registered report replicated and extended the previous study of binary gender differences in daily word use to address these concerns. Across 2,197 participants (more than five-fold the original sample size), pooled over 22 samples (631,030 ambient audio recordings), men spoke on average 11,950 WPD and women 13,349 WPD, with very large individual differences (< 100 to > 120,000 WPD). The estimated gender difference (1,073 WPD; <i>d</i> = 0.13; 95% CrI [316, 1,824]) was about twice as large as in the original study. Smaller differences emerged among adolescent (513 WPD), emerging adult (841 WPD), and older adult (-788 WPD) participants, but a substantially larger difference emerged for participants in early and middle adulthood (3,275 WPD; <i>d</i> = 0.32). Despite the considerable sample size(s), all estimates carried large statistical uncertainty and, except for the gender difference in early and middle adulthood, provide inconclusive evidence regarding whether the two genders ultimately speak a practically equivalent number of WPD, based on the preregistered ± 1,000 WPD regions of practical equivalence criterion. Experienced stress had no meaningful effect on the gender difference, and no clear pattern emerged as to whether the gender difference is accentuated for subjectively rated compared with objectively observed talkativeness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are women really (not) more talkative than men? A registered report of binary gender similarities/differences in daily word use.\",\"authors\":\"Colin A Tidwell, Alexander F Danvers, Valeria A Pfeifer, Danielle B Abel, Eva Alisic, Andrew Beer, Sabrina J Bierstetel, Kathryn L Bollich-Ziegler, Michelle Bruni, William R Calabrese, Christine Chiarello, Burcu Demiray, Sona Dimidjian, Karen L Fingerman, Maximilian Haas, Deanna M Kaplan, Yijung K Kim, Goran Knezevic, Ljiljana B Lazarevic, Minxia Luo, Alessandra Macbeth, Joseph H Manson, Jennifer S Mascaro, Christina Metcalf, Kyle S Minor, Suzanne Moseley, Angelina J Polsinelli, Charles L Raison, James K Rilling, Megan L Robbins, David Sbarra, Richard B Slatcher, Jessie Sun, Mira Vasileva, Simine Vazire, Matthias R Mehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pspp0000534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Women are widely assumed to be more talkative than men. Challenging this assumption, Mehl et al. (2007) provided empirical evidence that men and women do not differ significantly in their daily word use, speaking about 16,000 words per day (WPD) each. However, concerns were raised that their sample was too small to yield generalizable estimates and too age and context homogeneous to permit inferences beyond college students. This registered report replicated and extended the previous study of binary gender differences in daily word use to address these concerns. Across 2,197 participants (more than five-fold the original sample size), pooled over 22 samples (631,030 ambient audio recordings), men spoke on average 11,950 WPD and women 13,349 WPD, with very large individual differences (< 100 to > 120,000 WPD). The estimated gender difference (1,073 WPD; <i>d</i> = 0.13; 95% CrI [316, 1,824]) was about twice as large as in the original study. Smaller differences emerged among adolescent (513 WPD), emerging adult (841 WPD), and older adult (-788 WPD) participants, but a substantially larger difference emerged for participants in early and middle adulthood (3,275 WPD; <i>d</i> = 0.32). Despite the considerable sample size(s), all estimates carried large statistical uncertainty and, except for the gender difference in early and middle adulthood, provide inconclusive evidence regarding whether the two genders ultimately speak a practically equivalent number of WPD, based on the preregistered ± 1,000 WPD regions of practical equivalence criterion. Experienced stress had no meaningful effect on the gender difference, and no clear pattern emerged as to whether the gender difference is accentuated for subjectively rated compared with objectively observed talkativeness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of personality and social psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of personality and social psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000534\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000534","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为女性比男性更健谈。Mehl等人(2007)对这一假设提出了挑战,他们提供了经验证据,证明男性和女性在日常词汇使用上没有显著差异,每人每天大约说16000个单词。然而,有人担心,他们的样本太小,无法得出概括的估计,年龄和背景也太同质,无法对大学生以外的人进行推断。本注册报告复制并扩展了之前关于日常词汇使用中的二元性别差异的研究,以解决这些问题。在2197名参与者(超过原始样本量的五倍)中,汇集了22个样本(631,030个环境音频记录),男性平均说话11,950个WPD,女性平均说话13,349个WPD,个体差异非常大(< 100到bbbb12万WPD)。估计的性别差异(1,073 WPD;D = 0.13;95% CrI[316,1824])约为原始研究的两倍。在青少年(513个WPD)、刚成年(841个WPD)和老年人(-788个WPD)参与者中出现了较小的差异,但在成年早期和中期参与者中出现了显著较大的差异(3,275个WPD;D = 0.32)。尽管样本量相当大,但所有的估计都有很大的统计不确定性,除了成年早期和中期的性别差异外,基于预登记的±1000个WPD区域的实际等效标准,关于两种性别最终是否会说实际相等的WPD数量,提供了不确定的证据。经历过的压力对性别差异没有显著影响,也没有明确的模式显示主观评价与客观观察的健谈性是否会加剧性别差异。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are women really (not) more talkative than men? A registered report of binary gender similarities/differences in daily word use.

Women are widely assumed to be more talkative than men. Challenging this assumption, Mehl et al. (2007) provided empirical evidence that men and women do not differ significantly in their daily word use, speaking about 16,000 words per day (WPD) each. However, concerns were raised that their sample was too small to yield generalizable estimates and too age and context homogeneous to permit inferences beyond college students. This registered report replicated and extended the previous study of binary gender differences in daily word use to address these concerns. Across 2,197 participants (more than five-fold the original sample size), pooled over 22 samples (631,030 ambient audio recordings), men spoke on average 11,950 WPD and women 13,349 WPD, with very large individual differences (< 100 to > 120,000 WPD). The estimated gender difference (1,073 WPD; d = 0.13; 95% CrI [316, 1,824]) was about twice as large as in the original study. Smaller differences emerged among adolescent (513 WPD), emerging adult (841 WPD), and older adult (-788 WPD) participants, but a substantially larger difference emerged for participants in early and middle adulthood (3,275 WPD; d = 0.32). Despite the considerable sample size(s), all estimates carried large statistical uncertainty and, except for the gender difference in early and middle adulthood, provide inconclusive evidence regarding whether the two genders ultimately speak a practically equivalent number of WPD, based on the preregistered ± 1,000 WPD regions of practical equivalence criterion. Experienced stress had no meaningful effect on the gender difference, and no clear pattern emerged as to whether the gender difference is accentuated for subjectively rated compared with objectively observed talkativeness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信