在糖尿病肾病诊断模型中实现新的全血细胞计数衍生炎症指标。

IF 1.6 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2
Ali Hassanzadeh, Mehdi Allahdadi, Sepehr Nayebirad, Nazli Namazi, Ensieh Nasli-Esfahani
{"title":"在糖尿病肾病诊断模型中实现新的全血细胞计数衍生炎症指标。","authors":"Ali Hassanzadeh, Mehdi Allahdadi, Sepehr Nayebirad, Nazli Namazi, Ensieh Nasli-Esfahani","doi":"10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hemogram inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), red-cell distribution width (RDW), and mean platelet volume (MPV) have been associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications, namely diabetic kidney diseases (DKD). We aimed to develop and validate logistic regression (LR) and CatBoost diagnostic models and study the role of adding these markers to the models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All individuals who were managed in our secondary care center from March 2020 to December 2023 were identified. After excluding the ineligible patients, train-test splitting, and data preprocessing, two baseline LR and CatBoost-based models were developed using demographic, clinical, and laboratory features. The AUC-ROC of the models with biomarkers (NLR, PLR, RDW, and MPV) was compared to the baseline models. We calculated net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination index (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and eleven T2DM patients were eligible. The AUC-ROC of both LR (0.738) and CatBoost (0.715) models was comparable. Adding target inflammatory markers did not significantly change the AUC-ROC in both LR and CatBoost models. Adding RDW to the baseline LR model reclassified 41.7% of patients without DKD, in the cost of misclassification of 38.4% of DKD cases. This change was absent in CatBoost models, and other markers did not achieve improved NRI or IDI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The basic models with demographical and clinical features had acceptable performance. Adding RDW to the basic LR model improved the reclassification of the non-DKD participants. However, adding other hematological indices did not significantly improve the LR and CatBoost models' performance.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":15635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing novel complete blood count-derived inflammatory indices in the diabetic kidney diseases diagnostic models.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Hassanzadeh, Mehdi Allahdadi, Sepehr Nayebirad, Nazli Namazi, Ensieh Nasli-Esfahani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hemogram inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), red-cell distribution width (RDW), and mean platelet volume (MPV) have been associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications, namely diabetic kidney diseases (DKD). We aimed to develop and validate logistic regression (LR) and CatBoost diagnostic models and study the role of adding these markers to the models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All individuals who were managed in our secondary care center from March 2020 to December 2023 were identified. After excluding the ineligible patients, train-test splitting, and data preprocessing, two baseline LR and CatBoost-based models were developed using demographic, clinical, and laboratory features. The AUC-ROC of the models with biomarkers (NLR, PLR, RDW, and MPV) was compared to the baseline models. We calculated net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination index (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and eleven T2DM patients were eligible. The AUC-ROC of both LR (0.738) and CatBoost (0.715) models was comparable. Adding target inflammatory markers did not significantly change the AUC-ROC in both LR and CatBoost models. Adding RDW to the baseline LR model reclassified 41.7% of patients without DKD, in the cost of misclassification of 38.4% of DKD cases. This change was absent in CatBoost models, and other markers did not achieve improved NRI or IDI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The basic models with demographical and clinical features had acceptable performance. Adding RDW to the basic LR model improved the reclassification of the non-DKD participants. However, adding other hematological indices did not significantly improve the LR and CatBoost models' performance.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:血象炎症标志物,包括中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、红细胞分布宽度(RDW)和平均血小板体积(MPV)与2型糖尿病(T2DM)及其并发症,即糖尿病肾病(DKD)相关。我们旨在开发和验证逻辑回归(LR)和CatBoost诊断模型,并研究将这些标记添加到模型中的作用。方法:对2020年3月至2023年12月在我们二级保健中心管理的所有个体进行识别。在排除不符合条件的患者、训练测试分割和数据预处理后,利用人口统计学、临床和实验室特征建立了两个基线LR和基于catboost的模型。将具有生物标志物(NLR、PLR、RDW和MPV)的模型的AUC-ROC与基线模型进行比较。计算净重分类改进(NRI)和综合区分指数(IDI)。结果:1111例T2DM患者入选。LR(0.738)和CatBoost(0.715)模型的AUC-ROC具有可比性。添加目标炎症标志物对LR和CatBoost模型的AUC-ROC均无显著改变。将RDW添加到基线LR模型中,41.7%的无DKD患者被重新分类,其中38.4%的DKD病例被错误分类。这种变化在CatBoost模型中不存在,其他标记物也没有达到改善的NRI或IDI。结论:具有人口学和临床特征的基本模型具有良好的性能。在基本LR模型中加入RDW改善了非dkd参与者的再分类。然而,添加其他血液学指标并没有显著改善LR和CatBoost模型的性能。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing novel complete blood count-derived inflammatory indices in the diabetic kidney diseases diagnostic models.

Objectives: Hemogram inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), red-cell distribution width (RDW), and mean platelet volume (MPV) have been associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications, namely diabetic kidney diseases (DKD). We aimed to develop and validate logistic regression (LR) and CatBoost diagnostic models and study the role of adding these markers to the models.

Methods: All individuals who were managed in our secondary care center from March 2020 to December 2023 were identified. After excluding the ineligible patients, train-test splitting, and data preprocessing, two baseline LR and CatBoost-based models were developed using demographic, clinical, and laboratory features. The AUC-ROC of the models with biomarkers (NLR, PLR, RDW, and MPV) was compared to the baseline models. We calculated net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination index (IDI).

Results: One thousand and eleven T2DM patients were eligible. The AUC-ROC of both LR (0.738) and CatBoost (0.715) models was comparable. Adding target inflammatory markers did not significantly change the AUC-ROC in both LR and CatBoost models. Adding RDW to the baseline LR model reclassified 41.7% of patients without DKD, in the cost of misclassification of 38.4% of DKD cases. This change was absent in CatBoost models, and other markers did not achieve improved NRI or IDI.

Conclusion: The basic models with demographical and clinical features had acceptable performance. Adding RDW to the basic LR model improved the reclassification of the non-DKD participants. However, adding other hematological indices did not significantly improve the LR and CatBoost models' performance.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders is a peer reviewed journal which publishes original clinical and translational articles and reviews in the field of endocrinology and provides a forum of debate of the highest quality on these issues. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, diabetes, lipid disorders, metabolic disorders, osteoporosis, interdisciplinary practices in endocrinology, cardiovascular and metabolic risk, aging research, obesity, traditional medicine, pychosomatic research, behavioral medicine, ethics and evidence-based practices.As of Jan 2018 the journal is published by Springer as a hybrid journal with no article processing charges. All articles published before 2018 are available free of charge on springerlink.Unofficial 2017 2-year Impact Factor: 1.816.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信