为口腔鳞状细胞癌术后患者制定包含那不勒斯预后评分的预后提名图

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Journal of Inflammation Research Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JIR.S500518
Xue-Lian Xu, Hao Cheng
{"title":"为口腔鳞状细胞癌术后患者制定包含那不勒斯预后评分的预后提名图","authors":"Xue-Lian Xu, Hao Cheng","doi":"10.2147/JIR.S500518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Naples prognostic score (NPS) and its relation to the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have been inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between NPS and the prognosis of postoperative OSCC patients. Additionally, the study sought to develop a new nomogram for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 576 OSCC patients who underwent surgical treatment at two hospitals between August 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. Subsequently, two nomograms were developed to predict DFS and OS based on these factors and underwent rigorous validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median DFS and OS were 31.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively. Significant differences in DFS and OS were observed among patients with different NPS scores. Adjuvant radiotherapy, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), extranodal extension (ENE), NPS, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgical safety margin, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), and systemic inflammation score (SIS) were identified as independent predictors of DFS and OS. In the training cohort, the nomogram's concordance index (C-index) for predicting DFS and OS was 0.701 and 0.693, respectively. In the validation group, the corresponding values were 0.642 and 0.635, respectively. Calibration plots confirmed a high level of agreement between the model's predictions and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated the nomogram's good clinical utility. Additionally, patients in the low-risk group did not benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, while those in the medium-risk and high-risk group could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPS significantly influences the prognosis of OSCC patients following surgery. The nomogram developed in this study holds significant clinical application potential. The low-risk subgroup of patients was not required to undergo postoperative radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inflammation Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"325-345"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Prognostic Nomogram Incorporating the Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Xue-Lian Xu, Hao Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JIR.S500518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Naples prognostic score (NPS) and its relation to the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have been inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between NPS and the prognosis of postoperative OSCC patients. Additionally, the study sought to develop a new nomogram for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 576 OSCC patients who underwent surgical treatment at two hospitals between August 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. Subsequently, two nomograms were developed to predict DFS and OS based on these factors and underwent rigorous validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median DFS and OS were 31.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively. Significant differences in DFS and OS were observed among patients with different NPS scores. Adjuvant radiotherapy, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), extranodal extension (ENE), NPS, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgical safety margin, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), and systemic inflammation score (SIS) were identified as independent predictors of DFS and OS. In the training cohort, the nomogram's concordance index (C-index) for predicting DFS and OS was 0.701 and 0.693, respectively. In the validation group, the corresponding values were 0.642 and 0.635, respectively. Calibration plots confirmed a high level of agreement between the model's predictions and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated the nomogram's good clinical utility. Additionally, patients in the low-risk group did not benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, while those in the medium-risk and high-risk group could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPS significantly influences the prognosis of OSCC patients following surgery. The nomogram developed in this study holds significant clinical application potential. The low-risk subgroup of patients was not required to undergo postoperative radiotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Inflammation Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"325-345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Inflammation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S500518\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inflammation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S500518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:那不勒斯预后评分(NPS)及其与口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)预后的关系尚无定论。本研究旨在探讨NPS与OSCC术后患者预后的关系。此外,该研究还寻求开发一种新的nomogram来预测无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。方法:该研究纳入了2008年8月至2018年6月在两家医院接受手术治疗的576例OSCC患者。进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析以确定独立的预后因素。随后,基于这些因素,我们开发了两个模态图来预测DFS和OS,并进行了严格的验证。结果:中位DFS和OS分别为31.5个月和36.5个月。不同NPS评分患者的DFS和OS差异有统计学意义。辅助放疗、年龄校正Charlson共病指数(ACCI)、结外延伸(ENE)、NPS、美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期、手术安全裕度、东部肿瘤合作组表现状态(ECOG PS)和全身炎症评分(SIS)被确定为DFS和OS的独立预测因子。在训练队列中,预测DFS和OS的nomogram一致性指数(C-index)分别为0.701和0.693。验证组对应值分别为0.642和0.635。校正图证实了模型预测和实际结果之间的高度一致性。决策曲线分析(Decision curve analysis, DCA)显示了nomogram临床应用价值。此外,低危组患者不能从辅助放疗中获益,而中危和高危组患者可以从辅助放疗中获益。结论:NPS对OSCC患者术后预后有显著影响。本研究所建立的nomographic具有重要的临床应用潜力。低危亚组患者术后不需要进行放疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Prognostic Nomogram Incorporating the Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Background: The Naples prognostic score (NPS) and its relation to the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have been inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between NPS and the prognosis of postoperative OSCC patients. Additionally, the study sought to develop a new nomogram for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Methods: The study included 576 OSCC patients who underwent surgical treatment at two hospitals between August 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. Subsequently, two nomograms were developed to predict DFS and OS based on these factors and underwent rigorous validation.

Results: The median DFS and OS were 31.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively. Significant differences in DFS and OS were observed among patients with different NPS scores. Adjuvant radiotherapy, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), extranodal extension (ENE), NPS, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgical safety margin, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), and systemic inflammation score (SIS) were identified as independent predictors of DFS and OS. In the training cohort, the nomogram's concordance index (C-index) for predicting DFS and OS was 0.701 and 0.693, respectively. In the validation group, the corresponding values were 0.642 and 0.635, respectively. Calibration plots confirmed a high level of agreement between the model's predictions and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated the nomogram's good clinical utility. Additionally, patients in the low-risk group did not benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, while those in the medium-risk and high-risk group could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.

Conclusion: NPS significantly influences the prognosis of OSCC patients following surgery. The nomogram developed in this study holds significant clinical application potential. The low-risk subgroup of patients was not required to undergo postoperative radiotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inflammation Research
Journal of Inflammation Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
658
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings on the molecular basis, cell biology and pharmacology of inflammation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信