产科暴力的全球流行率和风险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sevil Hakimi, Leila Allahqoli, Maryam Alizadeh, Meryem Ozdemir, Hamid Soori, Esin Ceber Turfan, Neriman Sogukpinar, Ibrahim Alkatout
{"title":"产科暴力的全球流行率和风险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Sevil Hakimi, Leila Allahqoli, Maryam Alizadeh, Meryem Ozdemir, Hamid Soori, Esin Ceber Turfan, Neriman Sogukpinar, Ibrahim Alkatout","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric violence (OBV), defined as mistreatment or abuse during childbirth, is a pervasive global issue, albeit with regional differences, affecting women's physical and emotional well-being.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of OBV to identify risk factors associated with OBV and to make suggestions for improving maternal healthcare practices and policies.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four electronic databases for studies published over 10 years up to 31 January 2024: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS). The search was conducted among English language papers using a carefully curated set of keywords.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review, including all observational reporting data on the prevalence of and risk factors associated with OBV, irrespective of geographical location. The studies included in the review were required to be published in peer-reviewed. journals and available in the English language.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>The data of the studies were summarized in an Excel file (version 19) and analyzed using R (version 4.2.3). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of and identify risk factors associated with OBV.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The global prevalence of OBV estimated based on 25 studies, calculated with a random-effects model, was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.70; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.5%). The most prevalent subdomain of OBV was non-consented care (37%; 95% CI 0.23-0.50; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.7%). The following factors were found to be significantly associated with OBV: the presence of a midwife as skilled personnel beside the woman during childbirth (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI] = 0.4 [0.2-0.9]), which might reduce the likelihood of OBV; middle and high levels of income (OR [95% CI] = 0.5 [0.2-0.7]), which might also reduce the likelihood of OBV; and vaginal delivery (OR [95% CI] = 2.08 [1.1-3.08]), which is liable to increase the likelihood of OBV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the considerable prevalence and multifaceted nature of OBV, underscoring the urgent need for interventions at multiple levels to address this pervasive issue and ensure respectful, safe, and dignified maternal healthcare for all women.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global prevalence and risk factors of obstetric violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sevil Hakimi, Leila Allahqoli, Maryam Alizadeh, Meryem Ozdemir, Hamid Soori, Esin Ceber Turfan, Neriman Sogukpinar, Ibrahim Alkatout\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.16145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric violence (OBV), defined as mistreatment or abuse during childbirth, is a pervasive global issue, albeit with regional differences, affecting women's physical and emotional well-being.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of OBV to identify risk factors associated with OBV and to make suggestions for improving maternal healthcare practices and policies.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four electronic databases for studies published over 10 years up to 31 January 2024: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS). The search was conducted among English language papers using a carefully curated set of keywords.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review, including all observational reporting data on the prevalence of and risk factors associated with OBV, irrespective of geographical location. The studies included in the review were required to be published in peer-reviewed. journals and available in the English language.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>The data of the studies were summarized in an Excel file (version 19) and analyzed using R (version 4.2.3). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of and identify risk factors associated with OBV.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The global prevalence of OBV estimated based on 25 studies, calculated with a random-effects model, was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.70; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.5%). The most prevalent subdomain of OBV was non-consented care (37%; 95% CI 0.23-0.50; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.7%). The following factors were found to be significantly associated with OBV: the presence of a midwife as skilled personnel beside the woman during childbirth (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI] = 0.4 [0.2-0.9]), which might reduce the likelihood of OBV; middle and high levels of income (OR [95% CI] = 0.5 [0.2-0.7]), which might also reduce the likelihood of OBV; and vaginal delivery (OR [95% CI] = 2.08 [1.1-3.08]), which is liable to increase the likelihood of OBV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the considerable prevalence and multifaceted nature of OBV, underscoring the urgent need for interventions at multiple levels to address this pervasive issue and ensure respectful, safe, and dignified maternal healthcare for all women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16145\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产科暴力(OBV),定义为分娩期间的虐待或虐待,是一个普遍存在的全球问题,尽管存在区域差异,影响妇女的身心健康。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估OBV的患病率,以确定与OBV相关的风险因素,并为改善孕产妇保健实践和政策提出建议。检索策略:在一项系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们检索了四个电子数据库,检索了截至2024年1月31日的10年内发表的研究:Medline (PubMed)、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science (WOS)。搜索是在英文论文中进行的,使用了一组精心策划的关键词。选择标准:我们进行了一项全面的审查,包括所有观察性报告数据,无论地理位置如何,都与OBV的患病率和相关风险因素有关。该综述中包含的研究需要在同行评议中发表。杂志,并提供英文版本。数据收集和分析:将研究数据汇总到Excel (version 19)中,并使用R (version 4.2.3)进行分析。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估OBV的总患病率并确定与OBV相关的危险因素。主要结果:基于25项研究,用随机效应模型计算,OBV的全球患病率估计为59%(95%置信区间[CI] 0.48-0.70;i2 = 99.5%)。最普遍的OBV子领域是未经同意的护理(37%;95% ci 0.23-0.50;i2 = 99.7%)。发现以下因素与OBV显著相关:分娩时产妇身边有助产士作为熟练人员(优势比[OR] [95% CI] = 0.4[0.2-0.9]),这可能降低OBV的可能性;中高收入水平(OR [95% CI] = 0.5[0.2-0.7]),这也可能降低OBV的可能性;结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析强调了OBV的相当普遍和多面性,强调了迫切需要在多个层面进行干预,以解决这一普遍存在的问题,并确保所有妇女获得尊重、安全和有尊严的孕产妇保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global prevalence and risk factors of obstetric violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Obstetric violence (OBV), defined as mistreatment or abuse during childbirth, is a pervasive global issue, albeit with regional differences, affecting women's physical and emotional well-being.

Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of OBV to identify risk factors associated with OBV and to make suggestions for improving maternal healthcare practices and policies.

Search strategy: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four electronic databases for studies published over 10 years up to 31 January 2024: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS). The search was conducted among English language papers using a carefully curated set of keywords.

Selection criteria: We conducted a comprehensive review, including all observational reporting data on the prevalence of and risk factors associated with OBV, irrespective of geographical location. The studies included in the review were required to be published in peer-reviewed. journals and available in the English language.

Data collection and analysis: The data of the studies were summarized in an Excel file (version 19) and analyzed using R (version 4.2.3). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of and identify risk factors associated with OBV.

Main results: The global prevalence of OBV estimated based on 25 studies, calculated with a random-effects model, was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.70; I2 = 99.5%). The most prevalent subdomain of OBV was non-consented care (37%; 95% CI 0.23-0.50; I2 = 99.7%). The following factors were found to be significantly associated with OBV: the presence of a midwife as skilled personnel beside the woman during childbirth (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI] = 0.4 [0.2-0.9]), which might reduce the likelihood of OBV; middle and high levels of income (OR [95% CI] = 0.5 [0.2-0.7]), which might also reduce the likelihood of OBV; and vaginal delivery (OR [95% CI] = 2.08 [1.1-3.08]), which is liable to increase the likelihood of OBV.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the considerable prevalence and multifaceted nature of OBV, underscoring the urgent need for interventions at multiple levels to address this pervasive issue and ensure respectful, safe, and dignified maternal healthcare for all women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信