墨西哥孕产妇保健中的族裔和种族歧视:寻求全民健康覆盖过程中被忽视的挑战。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Edson Serván-Mori, Sergio Meneses-Navarro, Rocío García-Díaz, Diego Cerecero-García, David Contreras-Loya, Octavio Gómez-Dantés, Arachu Castro
{"title":"墨西哥孕产妇保健中的族裔和种族歧视:寻求全民健康覆盖过程中被忽视的挑战。","authors":"Edson Serván-Mori, Sergio Meneses-Navarro, Rocío García-Díaz, Diego Cerecero-García, David Contreras-Loya, Octavio Gómez-Dantés, Arachu Castro","doi":"10.1186/s12939-024-02374-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethnic and racial discrimination in maternal health care has been overlooked in academic literature and yet it is critical for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). There is a lack of empirical evidence on its impact on the effective coverage of maternal health interventions (ECMH) for Indigenous women in Mexico. Documenting progress in reducing maternal health inequities, particularly given the disproportionate impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on ethnic minorities, is essential to improving equity in health systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based, pooled cross-sectional, and retrospective analysis for 2009-2023, using data from the last three waves (2014, 2018, and 2023) of a nationally representative demographic survey (ENADID). Our study included n = 72,873 (N = 23,245,468) Mexican women aged 12-54 with recent live births. We defined ECMH as adequate antenatal care (ANC), skilled and/or institutional delivery care, timely postpartum care, and complication-free postpartum/puerperium. After describing sociodemographic characteristics and maternal health coverage by Indigenous status, we estimated a pooled fixed-effects multivariable regression model to adjust ECMH for relevant covariates. We used the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for nonlinear regression models to quantify inequities in ECMH due to ethnic-racial discrimination, defined as differences in outcomes attributable to differential treatment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Indigenous women had lower education, labor market participation, and socioeconomic position, higher parity, and more rural, poorer state residence than non-Indigenous women. They faced significant health coverage loss due to the dismantling of Seguro Popular, a public health insurance mechanism in place until the end of 2019, right before the start of the Covid pandemic. Adjusted ECMH was 25.3% for non-Indigenous women and 18.3% for Indigenous women, peaking at 28.8% and 21.2% in 2013-2018, declining to 25.7% and 18.7% pre-Covid (January 2019 to March 2020), and further declining to 24.0% and 17.4% during Covid, with an increase to 26.6% for non-Indigenous women post-Covid, while remaining similar for Indigenous women. Decomposition analyses revealed that during the analyzed period, 30.8% of the gap in ECMH was due to individual characteristics, 51.7% to ethnic-racial discrimination, and 17.5% to their interaction. From 2009 to 2012, 42.2% of the gap stemmed from observable differences, while 40.4% was due to discrimination. In the pre-Covid-19 phase, less than 1% was from observable characteristics, with 75.3% attributed to discrimination, which remained in the post-Covid-19 stage (78.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite modest health policy successes, the ethnic gap in ECMH remains unchanged, indicating insufficient action against inequity-producing structures. Ethnic and racial discrimination persists, exacerbated during the pandemic and coinciding with the government's cancellation of targeted social programs and public health insurance focused on the poorest populations, including Indigenous peoples. Thus, prioritizing maternal and child health underscores the need for comprehensive policies, including specific anti-racist interventions. Addressing these inequities requires the recognition of both observable and unobservable factors driven by discriminatory ideologies and the implementation of targeted measures to confront the complex interactions driving discrimination in maternal health care services for Indigenous women.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnic and racial discrimination in maternal health care in Mexico: a neglected challenge in the search for universal health coverage.\",\"authors\":\"Edson Serván-Mori, Sergio Meneses-Navarro, Rocío García-Díaz, Diego Cerecero-García, David Contreras-Loya, Octavio Gómez-Dantés, Arachu Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-024-02374-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethnic and racial discrimination in maternal health care has been overlooked in academic literature and yet it is critical for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). There is a lack of empirical evidence on its impact on the effective coverage of maternal health interventions (ECMH) for Indigenous women in Mexico. Documenting progress in reducing maternal health inequities, particularly given the disproportionate impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on ethnic minorities, is essential to improving equity in health systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based, pooled cross-sectional, and retrospective analysis for 2009-2023, using data from the last three waves (2014, 2018, and 2023) of a nationally representative demographic survey (ENADID). Our study included n = 72,873 (N = 23,245,468) Mexican women aged 12-54 with recent live births. We defined ECMH as adequate antenatal care (ANC), skilled and/or institutional delivery care, timely postpartum care, and complication-free postpartum/puerperium. After describing sociodemographic characteristics and maternal health coverage by Indigenous status, we estimated a pooled fixed-effects multivariable regression model to adjust ECMH for relevant covariates. We used the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for nonlinear regression models to quantify inequities in ECMH due to ethnic-racial discrimination, defined as differences in outcomes attributable to differential treatment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Indigenous women had lower education, labor market participation, and socioeconomic position, higher parity, and more rural, poorer state residence than non-Indigenous women. They faced significant health coverage loss due to the dismantling of Seguro Popular, a public health insurance mechanism in place until the end of 2019, right before the start of the Covid pandemic. Adjusted ECMH was 25.3% for non-Indigenous women and 18.3% for Indigenous women, peaking at 28.8% and 21.2% in 2013-2018, declining to 25.7% and 18.7% pre-Covid (January 2019 to March 2020), and further declining to 24.0% and 17.4% during Covid, with an increase to 26.6% for non-Indigenous women post-Covid, while remaining similar for Indigenous women. Decomposition analyses revealed that during the analyzed period, 30.8% of the gap in ECMH was due to individual characteristics, 51.7% to ethnic-racial discrimination, and 17.5% to their interaction. From 2009 to 2012, 42.2% of the gap stemmed from observable differences, while 40.4% was due to discrimination. In the pre-Covid-19 phase, less than 1% was from observable characteristics, with 75.3% attributed to discrimination, which remained in the post-Covid-19 stage (78.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite modest health policy successes, the ethnic gap in ECMH remains unchanged, indicating insufficient action against inequity-producing structures. Ethnic and racial discrimination persists, exacerbated during the pandemic and coinciding with the government's cancellation of targeted social programs and public health insurance focused on the poorest populations, including Indigenous peoples. Thus, prioritizing maternal and child health underscores the need for comprehensive policies, including specific anti-racist interventions. Addressing these inequities requires the recognition of both observable and unobservable factors driven by discriminatory ideologies and the implementation of targeted measures to confront the complex interactions driving discrimination in maternal health care services for Indigenous women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726964/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02374-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02374-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学术文献忽视了孕产妇保健中的民族和种族歧视,但它对实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)至关重要。关于其对墨西哥土著妇女产妇保健干预措施有效覆盖范围的影响,缺乏经验证据。记录在减少孕产妇保健不平等方面取得的进展,特别是考虑到Covid-19大流行对少数民族的不成比例的影响,对于改善卫生系统的公平性至关重要。方法:我们对2009-2023年进行了基于人群的汇总横断面和回顾性分析,使用了全国代表性人口调查(ENADID)的最后三波(2014年、2018年和2023年)的数据。我们的研究纳入了n = 72,873 (n = 23,245,468)名12-54岁近期活产的墨西哥妇女。我们将ECMH定义为充分的产前护理(ANC)、熟练和/或机构分娩护理、及时的产后护理和无并发症的产后/产褥期。在描述了社会人口学特征和土著身份的孕产妇健康覆盖率之后,我们估计了一个固定效应多变量回归模型,以调整相关协变量的ECMH。我们使用Blinder-Oaxaca分解的非线性回归模型来量化由于民族-种族歧视导致的ECMH不公平,定义为由于差别待遇导致的结果差异。研究发现:与非土著妇女相比,土著妇女的受教育程度、劳动力市场参与度和社会经济地位较低,平等程度较高,居住在农村地区较差。由于直到2019年底(即新冠疫情开始前)才生效的公共健康保险机制“全民保险”(Seguro Popular)解体,他们面临着重大的健康保险损失。调整后的ECMH在非土著妇女中为25.3%,在土著妇女中为18.3%,在2013-2018年达到28.8%和21.2%的峰值,在Covid前(2019年1月至2020年3月)下降到25.7%和18.7%,在Covid期间进一步下降到24.0%和17.4%,在Covid后非土著妇女增加到26.6%,而在土著妇女中保持不变。分解分析表明,在分析期内,30.8%的ECMH差距是由个体特征造成的,51.7%是由民族-种族歧视造成的,17.5%是由民族-种族之间的相互作用造成的。从2009年到2012年,42.2%的差距是由可观察到的差异造成的,40.4%是由歧视造成的。在covid -19前阶段,来自可观察特征的比例不到1%,其中75.3%归因于歧视,这一比例仍保持在covid -19后阶段(78.7%)。结论:尽管卫生政策取得了一定的成功,但ECMH的种族差距仍然没有改变,表明对产生不平等的结构采取的行动不足。族裔和种族歧视仍然存在,在疫情期间加剧,同时政府取消了针对包括土著人民在内的最贫困人口的有针对性的社会方案和公共健康保险。因此,将妇幼保健列为优先事项强调需要制定全面政策,包括具体的反种族主义干预措施。要解决这些不平等问题,就必须承认由歧视性意识形态造成的可观察和不可观察的因素,并采取有针对性的措施,以应对在土著妇女孕产妇保健服务中造成歧视的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnic and racial discrimination in maternal health care in Mexico: a neglected challenge in the search for universal health coverage.

Background: Ethnic and racial discrimination in maternal health care has been overlooked in academic literature and yet it is critical for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). There is a lack of empirical evidence on its impact on the effective coverage of maternal health interventions (ECMH) for Indigenous women in Mexico. Documenting progress in reducing maternal health inequities, particularly given the disproportionate impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on ethnic minorities, is essential to improving equity in health systems.

Methods: We conducted a population-based, pooled cross-sectional, and retrospective analysis for 2009-2023, using data from the last three waves (2014, 2018, and 2023) of a nationally representative demographic survey (ENADID). Our study included n = 72,873 (N = 23,245,468) Mexican women aged 12-54 with recent live births. We defined ECMH as adequate antenatal care (ANC), skilled and/or institutional delivery care, timely postpartum care, and complication-free postpartum/puerperium. After describing sociodemographic characteristics and maternal health coverage by Indigenous status, we estimated a pooled fixed-effects multivariable regression model to adjust ECMH for relevant covariates. We used the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for nonlinear regression models to quantify inequities in ECMH due to ethnic-racial discrimination, defined as differences in outcomes attributable to differential treatment.

Findings: Indigenous women had lower education, labor market participation, and socioeconomic position, higher parity, and more rural, poorer state residence than non-Indigenous women. They faced significant health coverage loss due to the dismantling of Seguro Popular, a public health insurance mechanism in place until the end of 2019, right before the start of the Covid pandemic. Adjusted ECMH was 25.3% for non-Indigenous women and 18.3% for Indigenous women, peaking at 28.8% and 21.2% in 2013-2018, declining to 25.7% and 18.7% pre-Covid (January 2019 to March 2020), and further declining to 24.0% and 17.4% during Covid, with an increase to 26.6% for non-Indigenous women post-Covid, while remaining similar for Indigenous women. Decomposition analyses revealed that during the analyzed period, 30.8% of the gap in ECMH was due to individual characteristics, 51.7% to ethnic-racial discrimination, and 17.5% to their interaction. From 2009 to 2012, 42.2% of the gap stemmed from observable differences, while 40.4% was due to discrimination. In the pre-Covid-19 phase, less than 1% was from observable characteristics, with 75.3% attributed to discrimination, which remained in the post-Covid-19 stage (78.7%).

Conclusions: Despite modest health policy successes, the ethnic gap in ECMH remains unchanged, indicating insufficient action against inequity-producing structures. Ethnic and racial discrimination persists, exacerbated during the pandemic and coinciding with the government's cancellation of targeted social programs and public health insurance focused on the poorest populations, including Indigenous peoples. Thus, prioritizing maternal and child health underscores the need for comprehensive policies, including specific anti-racist interventions. Addressing these inequities requires the recognition of both observable and unobservable factors driven by discriminatory ideologies and the implementation of targeted measures to confront the complex interactions driving discrimination in maternal health care services for Indigenous women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信