Wolfgang Uter, Klaus Ejner Andersen, Richard Brans, Magnus Bruze, Steffen Schubert, Margarida Gonçalo
{"title":"“MOAHLFA(P)指数”:尝试标准化广泛使用的贴片检测患者描述符阵列。","authors":"Wolfgang Uter, Klaus Ejner Andersen, Richard Brans, Magnus Bruze, Steffen Schubert, Margarida Gonçalo","doi":"10.1111/cod.14750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since its inception in 1980, the MOHL index (% patients who are male, have occupational, hand, or leg dermatitis, respectively) and its later evolutions until the presently used MOAHLFA(P) index (adding % patients with atopic dermatitis, face dermatitis, age 40+ years and positive reaction(s) to ≥ 1 baseline series allergen) have been intended to convey important demographic and clinical information on the patients patch tested in a certain area and time, aiding the interpretation of the observed spectrum of sensitisation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the current usage of the MOAHLFA(P) index and suggest consolidated definitions for its single items.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A title/abstract search in Medline identified publications mentioning the evolving acronyms. A Delphi-like survey among contact dermatitis experts collected agreement with suggested definitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search term 'MOAHLFA' was used in 35 publications from a broad geographical origin. More than 80% of the 24 participants of the survey (65% response) agreed on maintaining to use (i) sex for the 'M' criterion, (ii) occupation-related dermatitis irrespective of medicolegal definitions for the 'O', (iii) atopic dermatitis (but not rhinitis or asthma) for the 'A'. The possibility to use more than one site among 'H', 'L' and 'F' and a more detailed description of age distribution were favoured, and the difficult interpretability of the 'P' measure was highlighted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 'classical' MOAHLFA(P) index may be extended. Some aspects, notably atopic dermatitis, need further standardisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 'MOAHLFA(P) Index': An Attempt to Standardise a Widely Used Array of Descriptors of Patch-Tested Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Uter, Klaus Ejner Andersen, Richard Brans, Magnus Bruze, Steffen Schubert, Margarida Gonçalo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cod.14750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since its inception in 1980, the MOHL index (% patients who are male, have occupational, hand, or leg dermatitis, respectively) and its later evolutions until the presently used MOAHLFA(P) index (adding % patients with atopic dermatitis, face dermatitis, age 40+ years and positive reaction(s) to ≥ 1 baseline series allergen) have been intended to convey important demographic and clinical information on the patients patch tested in a certain area and time, aiding the interpretation of the observed spectrum of sensitisation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the current usage of the MOAHLFA(P) index and suggest consolidated definitions for its single items.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A title/abstract search in Medline identified publications mentioning the evolving acronyms. A Delphi-like survey among contact dermatitis experts collected agreement with suggested definitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search term 'MOAHLFA' was used in 35 publications from a broad geographical origin. More than 80% of the 24 participants of the survey (65% response) agreed on maintaining to use (i) sex for the 'M' criterion, (ii) occupation-related dermatitis irrespective of medicolegal definitions for the 'O', (iii) atopic dermatitis (but not rhinitis or asthma) for the 'A'. The possibility to use more than one site among 'H', 'L' and 'F' and a more detailed description of age distribution were favoured, and the difficult interpretability of the 'P' measure was highlighted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 'classical' MOAHLFA(P) index may be extended. Some aspects, notably atopic dermatitis, need further standardisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Dermatitis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Dermatitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14750\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14750","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The 'MOAHLFA(P) Index': An Attempt to Standardise a Widely Used Array of Descriptors of Patch-Tested Patients.
Background: Since its inception in 1980, the MOHL index (% patients who are male, have occupational, hand, or leg dermatitis, respectively) and its later evolutions until the presently used MOAHLFA(P) index (adding % patients with atopic dermatitis, face dermatitis, age 40+ years and positive reaction(s) to ≥ 1 baseline series allergen) have been intended to convey important demographic and clinical information on the patients patch tested in a certain area and time, aiding the interpretation of the observed spectrum of sensitisation.
Objectives: To examine the current usage of the MOAHLFA(P) index and suggest consolidated definitions for its single items.
Methods: A title/abstract search in Medline identified publications mentioning the evolving acronyms. A Delphi-like survey among contact dermatitis experts collected agreement with suggested definitions.
Results: The search term 'MOAHLFA' was used in 35 publications from a broad geographical origin. More than 80% of the 24 participants of the survey (65% response) agreed on maintaining to use (i) sex for the 'M' criterion, (ii) occupation-related dermatitis irrespective of medicolegal definitions for the 'O', (iii) atopic dermatitis (but not rhinitis or asthma) for the 'A'. The possibility to use more than one site among 'H', 'L' and 'F' and a more detailed description of age distribution were favoured, and the difficult interpretability of the 'P' measure was highlighted.
Conclusions: The 'classical' MOAHLFA(P) index may be extended. Some aspects, notably atopic dermatitis, need further standardisation.
期刊介绍:
Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".