肉类摄取量与肠道菌群组成和功能的关系。

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Susanna C. Larsson , Ulrika Ericson , Koen F. Dekkers , Getachew Arage , Luka Marko Rašo , Sergi Sayols-Baixeras , Ulf Hammar , Gabriel Baldanzi , Diem Nguyen , H. Bjørn Nielsen , Jacob B. Holm , Ulf Risérus , Karl Michaëlsson , Johan Sundström , J Gustav Smith , Gunnar Engström , Johan Ärnlöv , Marju Orho-Melander , Tove Fall , Shafqat Ahmad
{"title":"肉类摄取量与肠道菌群组成和功能的关系。","authors":"Susanna C. Larsson ,&nbsp;Ulrika Ericson ,&nbsp;Koen F. Dekkers ,&nbsp;Getachew Arage ,&nbsp;Luka Marko Rašo ,&nbsp;Sergi Sayols-Baixeras ,&nbsp;Ulf Hammar ,&nbsp;Gabriel Baldanzi ,&nbsp;Diem Nguyen ,&nbsp;H. Bjørn Nielsen ,&nbsp;Jacob B. Holm ,&nbsp;Ulf Risérus ,&nbsp;Karl Michaëlsson ,&nbsp;Johan Sundström ,&nbsp;J Gustav Smith ,&nbsp;Gunnar Engström ,&nbsp;Johan Ärnlöv ,&nbsp;Marju Orho-Melander ,&nbsp;Tove Fall ,&nbsp;Shafqat Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.12.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Meat intake is suggested to affect gut microbiome composition and the risk of chronic diseases. We aimed to identify meat-associated gut microbiome features and their association with host factors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Gut microbiota species were profiled by deep shotgun metagenomics sequencing in 9669 individuals. Intake of white meat, unprocessed red meat, and processed red meat was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. The associations of meat intake with alpha-diversity and relative abundance of gut microbiota species were tested using linear regression models with adjustment for dietary fiber intake, body mass index, and other potential confounders. Meat-associated species were further assessed for association with enrichment of microbial gene function, meat-associated plasma metabolites, and clinical biomarkers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Higher intake of processed red meat was associated with reduced alpha microbial diversity. White meat, unprocessed, and processed red meat intakes were associated with 36, 14, and 322 microbiota species, respectively. Species associated with processed red meat were enriched for bacterial pathways like amino acid degradation, while those negatively linked were enriched for pathways like homoacetogenesis. Furthermore, species positively associated with processed red meat were to a large extent associated with reduced trimethylamine N-oxide and glutamine levels but increased creatine and carnitine metabolites, fasting insulin and glucose, C-reactive protein, apolipoprotein A1, and triglyceride levels and higher blood pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This largest to date population-based study on meat and gut microbiota suggests that meat intake, particularly processed red meat, may modify the gut microbiota composition, functional capacity, and health-related biomarkers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 124-133"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meat intake in relation to composition and function of gut microbiota\",\"authors\":\"Susanna C. Larsson ,&nbsp;Ulrika Ericson ,&nbsp;Koen F. Dekkers ,&nbsp;Getachew Arage ,&nbsp;Luka Marko Rašo ,&nbsp;Sergi Sayols-Baixeras ,&nbsp;Ulf Hammar ,&nbsp;Gabriel Baldanzi ,&nbsp;Diem Nguyen ,&nbsp;H. Bjørn Nielsen ,&nbsp;Jacob B. Holm ,&nbsp;Ulf Risérus ,&nbsp;Karl Michaëlsson ,&nbsp;Johan Sundström ,&nbsp;J Gustav Smith ,&nbsp;Gunnar Engström ,&nbsp;Johan Ärnlöv ,&nbsp;Marju Orho-Melander ,&nbsp;Tove Fall ,&nbsp;Shafqat Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.12.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Meat intake is suggested to affect gut microbiome composition and the risk of chronic diseases. We aimed to identify meat-associated gut microbiome features and their association with host factors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Gut microbiota species were profiled by deep shotgun metagenomics sequencing in 9669 individuals. Intake of white meat, unprocessed red meat, and processed red meat was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. The associations of meat intake with alpha-diversity and relative abundance of gut microbiota species were tested using linear regression models with adjustment for dietary fiber intake, body mass index, and other potential confounders. Meat-associated species were further assessed for association with enrichment of microbial gene function, meat-associated plasma metabolites, and clinical biomarkers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Higher intake of processed red meat was associated with reduced alpha microbial diversity. White meat, unprocessed, and processed red meat intakes were associated with 36, 14, and 322 microbiota species, respectively. Species associated with processed red meat were enriched for bacterial pathways like amino acid degradation, while those negatively linked were enriched for pathways like homoacetogenesis. Furthermore, species positively associated with processed red meat were to a large extent associated with reduced trimethylamine N-oxide and glutamine levels but increased creatine and carnitine metabolites, fasting insulin and glucose, C-reactive protein, apolipoprotein A1, and triglyceride levels and higher blood pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This largest to date population-based study on meat and gut microbiota suggests that meat intake, particularly processed red meat, may modify the gut microbiota composition, functional capacity, and health-related biomarkers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 124-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424004758\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424004758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肉类摄入量被认为会影响肠道微生物组的组成和慢性疾病的风险。我们旨在确定与肉类相关的肠道微生物组特征及其与宿主因素的关系:设计:对 9669 人的肠道微生物群物种进行了深度猎枪元基因组测序。使用食物频率问卷评估了白肉、未加工红肉和加工红肉的摄入量。使用线性回归模型检验了肉类摄入量与肠道微生物群物种的α-多样性和相对丰度之间的关系,并对膳食纤维摄入量、体重指数和其他潜在混杂因素进行了调整。还进一步评估了肉类相关物种与微生物基因功能、肉类相关血浆代谢物和临床生物标志物的相关性:结果:加工红肉摄入量越高,α微生物多样性越低。白肉、未加工和加工红肉的摄入量分别与 36、14 和 322 种微生物群相关。与加工红肉相关的物种富含氨基酸降解等细菌途径,而与之负相关的物种富含同乙酰生成等途径。此外,与加工红肉呈正相关的菌种在很大程度上与三甲胺 N-氧化物和谷氨酰胺水平降低有关,但与肌酸和肉碱代谢物、空腹胰岛素和葡萄糖、C 反应蛋白、脂蛋白 A1 和甘油三酯水平升高以及血压升高有关:这项迄今为止规模最大的基于人群的肉类和肠道微生物群研究表明,肉类摄入,尤其是加工红肉,可能会改变肠道微生物群的组成、功能能力和与健康相关的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meat intake in relation to composition and function of gut microbiota

Objective

Meat intake is suggested to affect gut microbiome composition and the risk of chronic diseases. We aimed to identify meat-associated gut microbiome features and their association with host factors.

Design

Gut microbiota species were profiled by deep shotgun metagenomics sequencing in 9669 individuals. Intake of white meat, unprocessed red meat, and processed red meat was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. The associations of meat intake with alpha-diversity and relative abundance of gut microbiota species were tested using linear regression models with adjustment for dietary fiber intake, body mass index, and other potential confounders. Meat-associated species were further assessed for association with enrichment of microbial gene function, meat-associated plasma metabolites, and clinical biomarkers.

Results

Higher intake of processed red meat was associated with reduced alpha microbial diversity. White meat, unprocessed, and processed red meat intakes were associated with 36, 14, and 322 microbiota species, respectively. Species associated with processed red meat were enriched for bacterial pathways like amino acid degradation, while those negatively linked were enriched for pathways like homoacetogenesis. Furthermore, species positively associated with processed red meat were to a large extent associated with reduced trimethylamine N-oxide and glutamine levels but increased creatine and carnitine metabolites, fasting insulin and glucose, C-reactive protein, apolipoprotein A1, and triglyceride levels and higher blood pressure.

Conclusion

This largest to date population-based study on meat and gut microbiota suggests that meat intake, particularly processed red meat, may modify the gut microbiota composition, functional capacity, and health-related biomarkers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信