DICER1突变在远处转移性甲状腺癌中的独特作用。

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cong Shi, Zhuanzhuan Mu, Wenting Guo, Xin Zhang, Di Sun, Yuqing Sun, Hao Wang, Dingding Zhang, Jun Liang, Yansong Lin
{"title":"DICER1突变在远处转移性甲状腺癌中的独特作用。","authors":"Cong Shi, Zhuanzhuan Mu, Wenting Guo, Xin Zhang, Di Sun, Yuqing Sun, Hao Wang, Dingding Zhang, Jun Liang, Yansong Lin","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.06.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the clinical significance of <i>DICER1</i> mutations in patients with distant metastatic follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer (FDTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 310 Chinese patients with distant metastatic FDTC. We analyzed the interactions between <i>DICER1</i> mutations and other gene alterations and compared the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) <i>DICER1</i> mutations (n=9), other gene alterations (n=253), and no gene alterations (n=37). To compare FDTCs with different drivers, isolated <i>BRAFV600E</i>, <i>RAS</i> mutations, and <i>RET</i> fusions were compared with isolated <i>DICER1</i> mutations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of <i>DICER1</i> mutations was 6.5% (20/310) in the patient cohort. Among patients with <i>DICER1</i> mutations, 45% (9/20) harbored P or LP <i>DICER1</i> variants and 55% (11/20) harbored <i>DICER1</i> variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The coexistence of <i>DICER1</i> mutations and other gene alterations was detected in 65% (13/20) of patients. Compared with VUS, P or LP <i>DICER1</i> variants were almost mutually exclusive with early driver alterations (such as <i>BRAFV600E</i>) (11.1% <i>vs.</i> 81.8%, P=0.002) and more coexisted with late-hit events, particularly <i>TP53</i> mutations (44.4% <i>vs.</i> 27.3%, P=0.642). Clinically, compared with the no alteration and other alteration groups, the <i>DICER1</i> mutation group exhibited larger primary tumors, higher poorly differentiated thyroid cancer proportion, more extrathyroidal extension, more extrapulmonary metastases, and higher radioactive iodine-refractory proportion (all P<0.05). Cases with isolated <i>DICER1</i> mutations differed from those with isolated <i>BRAFV600E</i> and <i>RET</i> fusions in terms of tumor size, poorly differentiated thyroid cancer proportion, and metastatic sites, but were similar to cases with isolated <i>RAS</i> mutations in the high proportion of follicular thyroid cancer, N0, and extrapulmonary metastases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mutation of <i>DICER1</i> gene is a non-negligible molecular event and it may represent an aggressive subset of FDTCs. <i>DICER1</i> has <i>RAS</i>-like clinical characteristics and <i>DICER1</i>-mutant tumors exhibit more aggressive clinical behaviors compared with those with <i>BRAFV600E</i> and <i>RET</i> fusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9882,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","volume":"36 6","pages":"700-712"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinctive role of <i>DICER1</i> mutations in distant metastatic thyroid cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Cong Shi, Zhuanzhuan Mu, Wenting Guo, Xin Zhang, Di Sun, Yuqing Sun, Hao Wang, Dingding Zhang, Jun Liang, Yansong Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.06.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the clinical significance of <i>DICER1</i> mutations in patients with distant metastatic follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer (FDTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 310 Chinese patients with distant metastatic FDTC. We analyzed the interactions between <i>DICER1</i> mutations and other gene alterations and compared the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) <i>DICER1</i> mutations (n=9), other gene alterations (n=253), and no gene alterations (n=37). To compare FDTCs with different drivers, isolated <i>BRAFV600E</i>, <i>RAS</i> mutations, and <i>RET</i> fusions were compared with isolated <i>DICER1</i> mutations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of <i>DICER1</i> mutations was 6.5% (20/310) in the patient cohort. Among patients with <i>DICER1</i> mutations, 45% (9/20) harbored P or LP <i>DICER1</i> variants and 55% (11/20) harbored <i>DICER1</i> variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The coexistence of <i>DICER1</i> mutations and other gene alterations was detected in 65% (13/20) of patients. Compared with VUS, P or LP <i>DICER1</i> variants were almost mutually exclusive with early driver alterations (such as <i>BRAFV600E</i>) (11.1% <i>vs.</i> 81.8%, P=0.002) and more coexisted with late-hit events, particularly <i>TP53</i> mutations (44.4% <i>vs.</i> 27.3%, P=0.642). Clinically, compared with the no alteration and other alteration groups, the <i>DICER1</i> mutation group exhibited larger primary tumors, higher poorly differentiated thyroid cancer proportion, more extrathyroidal extension, more extrapulmonary metastases, and higher radioactive iodine-refractory proportion (all P<0.05). Cases with isolated <i>DICER1</i> mutations differed from those with isolated <i>BRAFV600E</i> and <i>RET</i> fusions in terms of tumor size, poorly differentiated thyroid cancer proportion, and metastatic sites, but were similar to cases with isolated <i>RAS</i> mutations in the high proportion of follicular thyroid cancer, N0, and extrapulmonary metastases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mutation of <i>DICER1</i> gene is a non-negligible molecular event and it may represent an aggressive subset of FDTCs. <i>DICER1</i> has <i>RAS</i>-like clinical characteristics and <i>DICER1</i>-mutant tumors exhibit more aggressive clinical behaviors compared with those with <i>BRAFV600E</i> and <i>RET</i> fusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"700-712\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.06.08\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.06.08","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨远处转移性滤泡细胞源性甲状腺癌(FDTC)患者DICER1基因突变的临床意义。方法:本研究纳入310例中国远处转移性FDTC患者。我们分析了DICER1突变与其他基因改变之间的相互作用,并比较了致病性(P)或可能致病性(LP) DICER1突变(n=9)、其他基因改变(n=253)和无基因改变(n=37)患者的临床病理特征。为了比较不同驱动因素的fdtc,将分离的BRAFV600E、RAS突变和RET融合与分离的DICER1突变进行比较。结果:患者队列中DICER1突变的患病率为6.5%(20/310)。在DICER1突变患者中,45%(9/20)存在P或LP DICER1变异,55%(11/20)存在不确定意义(VUS)的DICER1变异。65%(13/20)的患者同时存在DICER1突变和其他基因改变。与VUS相比,P或LP DICER1变异与早期驱动因素改变(如BRAFV600E)几乎是相互排斥的(11.1%对81.8%,P=0.002),更多的与晚期事件共存,尤其是TP53突变(44.4%对27.3%,P=0.642)。临床上,与无改变组和其他改变组相比,DICER1突变组原发肿瘤更大,甲状腺低分化癌比例更高,甲状腺外扩展更多,肺外转移更多,放射性碘难治比例更高(所有PDICER1突变在肿瘤大小、低分化甲状腺癌比例和转移部位方面均与分离BRAFV600E和RET融合组不同)。但在滤泡性甲状腺癌、N0和肺外转移的高比例中,与分离的RAS突变病例相似。结论:DICER1基因突变是一个不可忽视的分子事件,它可能代表fdtc的侵袭性亚群。DICER1具有ras样的临床特征,与BRAFV600E和RET融合的肿瘤相比,DICER1突变肿瘤表现出更具侵袭性的临床行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinctive role of DICER1 mutations in distant metastatic thyroid cancer.

Objective: This study investigated the clinical significance of DICER1 mutations in patients with distant metastatic follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer (FDTC).

Methods: This study included 310 Chinese patients with distant metastatic FDTC. We analyzed the interactions between DICER1 mutations and other gene alterations and compared the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) DICER1 mutations (n=9), other gene alterations (n=253), and no gene alterations (n=37). To compare FDTCs with different drivers, isolated BRAFV600E, RAS mutations, and RET fusions were compared with isolated DICER1 mutations.

Results: The prevalence of DICER1 mutations was 6.5% (20/310) in the patient cohort. Among patients with DICER1 mutations, 45% (9/20) harbored P or LP DICER1 variants and 55% (11/20) harbored DICER1 variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The coexistence of DICER1 mutations and other gene alterations was detected in 65% (13/20) of patients. Compared with VUS, P or LP DICER1 variants were almost mutually exclusive with early driver alterations (such as BRAFV600E) (11.1% vs. 81.8%, P=0.002) and more coexisted with late-hit events, particularly TP53 mutations (44.4% vs. 27.3%, P=0.642). Clinically, compared with the no alteration and other alteration groups, the DICER1 mutation group exhibited larger primary tumors, higher poorly differentiated thyroid cancer proportion, more extrathyroidal extension, more extrapulmonary metastases, and higher radioactive iodine-refractory proportion (all P<0.05). Cases with isolated DICER1 mutations differed from those with isolated BRAFV600E and RET fusions in terms of tumor size, poorly differentiated thyroid cancer proportion, and metastatic sites, but were similar to cases with isolated RAS mutations in the high proportion of follicular thyroid cancer, N0, and extrapulmonary metastases.

Conclusions: Mutation of DICER1 gene is a non-negligible molecular event and it may represent an aggressive subset of FDTCs. DICER1 has RAS-like clinical characteristics and DICER1-mutant tumors exhibit more aggressive clinical behaviors compared with those with BRAFV600E and RET fusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
1726
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Cancer Research (CJCR; Print ISSN: 1000-9604; Online ISSN:1993-0631) is published by AME Publishing Company in association with Chinese Anti-Cancer Association.It was launched in March 1995 as a quarterly publication and is now published bi-monthly since February 2013. CJCR is published bi-monthly in English, and is an international journal devoted to the life sciences and medical sciences. It publishes peer-reviewed original articles of basic investigations and clinical observations, reviews and brief communications providing a forum for the recent experimental and clinical advances in cancer research. This journal is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), PubMed/PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, SciSearch, Chemistry Abstracts (CA), the Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Chinainfo, CNKI, CSCI, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信