Daniel Palkovics, Alexandra Hegyi, Balint Molnar, Mark Frater, Csaba Pinter, David García-Mato, Andres Diaz-Pinto, Peter Windisch
{"title":"基于深度学习CBCT分割的水平引导骨再生后硬组织变化评估。","authors":"Daniel Palkovics, Alexandra Hegyi, Balint Molnar, Mark Frater, Csaba Pinter, David García-Mato, Andres Diaz-Pinto, Peter Windisch","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06136-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model for segmenting cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans taken before and after mandibular horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR) to evaluate hard tissue changes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The proposed SegResNet-based DL model was trained on 70 CBCT scans. It was tested on 10 pairs of pre- and post-operative CBCT scans of patients who underwent mandibular horizontal GBR. DL segmentations were compared to semi-automated (SA) segmentations of the same scans. Augmented hard tissue segmentation performance was evaluated by spatially aligning pre- and post-operative CBCT scans and subtracting preoperative segmentations obtained by DL and SA segmentations from the respective postoperative segmentations. The performance of DL compared to SA segmentation was evaluated based on the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over the union (IoU), Hausdorff distance (HD95), and volume comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DSC and IoU between DL and SA segmentations were 0.96 ± 0.01 and 0.92 ± 0.02 in both pre- and post-operative CBCT scans. While HD95 values between DL and SA segmentations were 0.62 mm ± 0.16 mm and 0.77 mm ± 0.31 mm for pre- and post-operative CBCTs respectively. The DSC, IoU and HD95 averaged 0.85 ± 0.08; 0.78 ± 0.07 and 0.91 ± 0.92 mm for augmented hard tissue models respectively. Volumes mandible- and augmented hard tissue segmentations did not differ significantly between the DL and SA methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SegResNet-based DL model accurately segmented CBCT scans acquired before and after mandibular horizontal GBR. However, the training database must be further increased to increase the model's robustness.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Automated DL segmentation could aid treatment planning for GBR and subsequent implant placement procedures and in evaluating hard tissue changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of hard tissue changes after horizontal guided bone regeneration with the aid of deep learning CBCT segmentation.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Palkovics, Alexandra Hegyi, Balint Molnar, Mark Frater, Csaba Pinter, David García-Mato, Andres Diaz-Pinto, Peter Windisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-024-06136-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model for segmenting cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans taken before and after mandibular horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR) to evaluate hard tissue changes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The proposed SegResNet-based DL model was trained on 70 CBCT scans. It was tested on 10 pairs of pre- and post-operative CBCT scans of patients who underwent mandibular horizontal GBR. DL segmentations were compared to semi-automated (SA) segmentations of the same scans. Augmented hard tissue segmentation performance was evaluated by spatially aligning pre- and post-operative CBCT scans and subtracting preoperative segmentations obtained by DL and SA segmentations from the respective postoperative segmentations. The performance of DL compared to SA segmentation was evaluated based on the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over the union (IoU), Hausdorff distance (HD95), and volume comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DSC and IoU between DL and SA segmentations were 0.96 ± 0.01 and 0.92 ± 0.02 in both pre- and post-operative CBCT scans. While HD95 values between DL and SA segmentations were 0.62 mm ± 0.16 mm and 0.77 mm ± 0.31 mm for pre- and post-operative CBCTs respectively. The DSC, IoU and HD95 averaged 0.85 ± 0.08; 0.78 ± 0.07 and 0.91 ± 0.92 mm for augmented hard tissue models respectively. Volumes mandible- and augmented hard tissue segmentations did not differ significantly between the DL and SA methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SegResNet-based DL model accurately segmented CBCT scans acquired before and after mandibular horizontal GBR. However, the training database must be further increased to increase the model's robustness.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Automated DL segmentation could aid treatment planning for GBR and subsequent implant placement procedures and in evaluating hard tissue changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06136-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06136-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究深度学习(DL)模型对下颌水平引导骨再生(GBR)前后的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行分割的性能,以评估硬组织变化。材料和方法:提出的基于segresnet的深度学习模型在70个CBCT扫描上进行训练。对接受下颌骨水平GBR的患者进行了10对术前和术后CBCT扫描。将DL分割与相同扫描的半自动(SA)分割进行比较。通过对术前和术后CBCT扫描进行空间对齐,并从各自的术后分割中减去术前DL和SA分割获得的分割,来评估增强硬组织分割的性能。基于Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)、intersection over The union (IoU)、Hausdorff distance (HD95)和volume comparison来评估DL与SA分割的性能。结果:术前和术后CBCT的DL和SA节段DSC和IoU均值分别为0.96±0.01和0.92±0.02。术前和术后cbct的HD95值分别为0.62 mm±0.16 mm和0.77 mm±0.31 mm。DSC、IoU、HD95平均为0.85±0.08;增强硬组织模型分别为0.78±0.07 mm和0.91±0.92 mm。下颌骨和增强硬组织分割的体积在DL和SA方法之间没有显着差异。结论:基于segresnet的DL模型准确分割了下颌骨水平GBR前后的CBCT扫描。但是,为了提高模型的鲁棒性,必须进一步增加训练库。临床意义:自动DL分割可以帮助GBR的治疗计划和随后的植入物放置程序,并评估硬组织变化。
Assessment of hard tissue changes after horizontal guided bone regeneration with the aid of deep learning CBCT segmentation.
Objectives: To investigate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model for segmenting cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans taken before and after mandibular horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR) to evaluate hard tissue changes.
Materials and methods: The proposed SegResNet-based DL model was trained on 70 CBCT scans. It was tested on 10 pairs of pre- and post-operative CBCT scans of patients who underwent mandibular horizontal GBR. DL segmentations were compared to semi-automated (SA) segmentations of the same scans. Augmented hard tissue segmentation performance was evaluated by spatially aligning pre- and post-operative CBCT scans and subtracting preoperative segmentations obtained by DL and SA segmentations from the respective postoperative segmentations. The performance of DL compared to SA segmentation was evaluated based on the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over the union (IoU), Hausdorff distance (HD95), and volume comparison.
Results: The mean DSC and IoU between DL and SA segmentations were 0.96 ± 0.01 and 0.92 ± 0.02 in both pre- and post-operative CBCT scans. While HD95 values between DL and SA segmentations were 0.62 mm ± 0.16 mm and 0.77 mm ± 0.31 mm for pre- and post-operative CBCTs respectively. The DSC, IoU and HD95 averaged 0.85 ± 0.08; 0.78 ± 0.07 and 0.91 ± 0.92 mm for augmented hard tissue models respectively. Volumes mandible- and augmented hard tissue segmentations did not differ significantly between the DL and SA methods.
Conclusions: The SegResNet-based DL model accurately segmented CBCT scans acquired before and after mandibular horizontal GBR. However, the training database must be further increased to increase the model's robustness.
Clinical relevance: Automated DL segmentation could aid treatment planning for GBR and subsequent implant placement procedures and in evaluating hard tissue changes.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.