下肢力量是多发性硬化症患者跌倒和非跌倒的区别。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Heather M DelMastro, Tracy Wall, Deirdre J McPartland, Erik S Plaia, Naomi J Trimble, Jennifer A Ruiz, Katherine Harris, Elizabeth S Gromisch
{"title":"下肢力量是多发性硬化症患者跌倒和非跌倒的区别。","authors":"Heather M DelMastro, Tracy Wall, Deirdre J McPartland, Erik S Plaia, Naomi J Trimble, Jennifer A Ruiz, Katherine Harris, Elizabeth S Gromisch","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether hip flexion (HF), extension (HE), abduction (HA), knee flexion (KF) and extension (KE), and ankle plantarflexion (APF) and dorsiflexion (ADF) Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) differentiates between non-fall and fall history in persons with MS (PwMS) after accounting for age, gender, fatigue, disability, and disease duration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based comprehensive MS Center PARTICIPANTS: 172 persons with MS who completed a one-time visit INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lower limb (LL) MVC was measured for each muscle group as isometric peak torque (Newton-meter: Nm) of both limbs (Strongest: S; Weakest: W) using a Biodex Dynamometer and normalized by body weight (Nm/kg). Falls in the past 6-months were retrospectively collected and participants were classified as non-fall history (0 falls [non-fallers]; n = 78) or fall history (≥1 falls [fallers]; n = 94). Fall history was further categorized as occasional (1-2 falls [occasional fallers]; n = 51) and recurrent (≥3 falls [recurrent fallers]; n = 43).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall differences between participants with and without a fall history were noted on both limbs, with post-hoc analyses showing that those with a fall history had significantly lower strength (p < .05) on all LL-W and HF-S, HE-S, HA-S, KF-S, and APF-S. When separated out by fall frequency, recurrent fallers had diminished strength on all LL-W and HF-S, HE-S, HA-S, and APF-S, while occasional fallers exhibited reductions on HA-W, KE-W, and KF-W compared to non-fallers. Recurrent and occasional fallers differed on HE-W.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All LL-W and aspects of LL-S differentiated between fallers and non-fallers, with further differences observed when fall history was separated by frequency. These findings provide the necessary information to clinicians to inform their plans of care to address falls in MS and provide education on the importance of maintaining LL strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower limb strength differentiates between fallers and non-fallers with multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Heather M DelMastro, Tracy Wall, Deirdre J McPartland, Erik S Plaia, Naomi J Trimble, Jennifer A Ruiz, Katherine Harris, Elizabeth S Gromisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether hip flexion (HF), extension (HE), abduction (HA), knee flexion (KF) and extension (KE), and ankle plantarflexion (APF) and dorsiflexion (ADF) Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) differentiates between non-fall and fall history in persons with MS (PwMS) after accounting for age, gender, fatigue, disability, and disease duration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based comprehensive MS Center PARTICIPANTS: 172 persons with MS who completed a one-time visit INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lower limb (LL) MVC was measured for each muscle group as isometric peak torque (Newton-meter: Nm) of both limbs (Strongest: S; Weakest: W) using a Biodex Dynamometer and normalized by body weight (Nm/kg). Falls in the past 6-months were retrospectively collected and participants were classified as non-fall history (0 falls [non-fallers]; n = 78) or fall history (≥1 falls [fallers]; n = 94). Fall history was further categorized as occasional (1-2 falls [occasional fallers]; n = 51) and recurrent (≥3 falls [recurrent fallers]; n = 43).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall differences between participants with and without a fall history were noted on both limbs, with post-hoc analyses showing that those with a fall history had significantly lower strength (p < .05) on all LL-W and HF-S, HE-S, HA-S, KF-S, and APF-S. When separated out by fall frequency, recurrent fallers had diminished strength on all LL-W and HF-S, HE-S, HA-S, and APF-S, while occasional fallers exhibited reductions on HA-W, KE-W, and KF-W compared to non-fallers. Recurrent and occasional fallers differed on HE-W.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All LL-W and aspects of LL-S differentiated between fallers and non-fallers, with further differences observed when fall history was separated by frequency. These findings provide the necessary information to clinicians to inform their plans of care to address falls in MS and provide education on the importance of maintaining LL strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在考虑到年龄、性别、疲劳、残疾和病程等因素后,确定MS (PwMS)患者髋关节屈曲(HF)、伸展(HE)、外展(HA)、膝关节屈曲(KF)和伸展(KE)、踝关节跖屈(APF)和背屈(ADF)最大自主收缩(MVC)是否能区分非跌倒史和跌倒史。设计:对横断面研究进行二次分析。背景:以社区为基础的综合多发性硬化症中心参与者:172名完成了一次就诊的多发性硬化症患者干预措施:不适用主要结局测量:下肢(LL) MVC以四肢(最强:S;最弱:W),使用Biodex测力计并按体重(Nm/kg)归一化。回顾性收集过去6个月的跌倒记录,并将参与者分为无跌倒史(0次跌倒[无跌倒者];N = 78)或跌倒史(≥1次跌倒[fallers];n = 94)。跌倒史进一步分类为偶尔跌倒(1-2次跌倒[偶尔跌倒];N = 51)和复发(≥3次跌倒[复发跌倒者];n = 43)。结果:有跌倒史和没有跌倒史的参与者在四肢上的总体差异被注意到,事后分析显示,有跌倒史的参与者在所有LL-W和HF-S、HE-S、HA-S、KF-S和APF-S上的强度显着降低(p < 0.05)。当按跌倒频率分开时,复发性跌倒者在所有LL-W和HF-S、HE-S、HA-S和APF-S上的强度都有所下降,而偶尔跌倒者在HA-W、KE-W和KF-W上的强度与非跌倒者相比有所下降。复发性和偶发性患者在HE-W上存在差异。结论:跌倒者和非跌倒者的LL-W和LL-S的所有方面都有差异,当跌倒史以频率区分时,观察到进一步的差异。这些发现为临床医生提供了必要的信息,以告知他们的护理计划,以解决MS的跌倒问题,并提供了保持LL强度重要性的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lower limb strength differentiates between fallers and non-fallers with multiple sclerosis.

Objective: To determine whether hip flexion (HF), extension (HE), abduction (HA), knee flexion (KF) and extension (KE), and ankle plantarflexion (APF) and dorsiflexion (ADF) Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) differentiates between non-fall and fall history in persons with MS (PwMS) after accounting for age, gender, fatigue, disability, and disease duration.

Design: Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study.

Setting: Community-based comprehensive MS Center PARTICIPANTS: 172 persons with MS who completed a one-time visit INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lower limb (LL) MVC was measured for each muscle group as isometric peak torque (Newton-meter: Nm) of both limbs (Strongest: S; Weakest: W) using a Biodex Dynamometer and normalized by body weight (Nm/kg). Falls in the past 6-months were retrospectively collected and participants were classified as non-fall history (0 falls [non-fallers]; n = 78) or fall history (≥1 falls [fallers]; n = 94). Fall history was further categorized as occasional (1-2 falls [occasional fallers]; n = 51) and recurrent (≥3 falls [recurrent fallers]; n = 43).

Results: Overall differences between participants with and without a fall history were noted on both limbs, with post-hoc analyses showing that those with a fall history had significantly lower strength (p < .05) on all LL-W and HF-S, HE-S, HA-S, KF-S, and APF-S. When separated out by fall frequency, recurrent fallers had diminished strength on all LL-W and HF-S, HE-S, HA-S, and APF-S, while occasional fallers exhibited reductions on HA-W, KE-W, and KF-W compared to non-fallers. Recurrent and occasional fallers differed on HE-W.

Conclusion: All LL-W and aspects of LL-S differentiated between fallers and non-fallers, with further differences observed when fall history was separated by frequency. These findings provide the necessary information to clinicians to inform their plans of care to address falls in MS and provide education on the importance of maintaining LL strength.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信