利用阻抗心动图数据进行基于机器学习的血压估算。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
T. L. Bothe, A. Patzak, O. S. Opatz, V. Heinz, N. Pilz
{"title":"利用阻抗心动图数据进行基于机器学习的血压估算。","authors":"T. L. Bothe,&nbsp;A. Patzak,&nbsp;O. S. Opatz,&nbsp;V. Heinz,&nbsp;N. Pilz","doi":"10.1111/apha.14269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is crucial for the diagnosis, risk assessment, treatment decision-making, and monitoring of cardiovascular diseases. Unfortunately, cuff-based BP measurements suffer from inaccuracies and discomfort. This study is the first to access the feasibility of machine learning-based BP estimation using impedance cardiography (ICG) data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed ICG data from 71 young and healthy adults. Nine different machine learning algorithms were evaluated for their BP estimation performance against quality controlled, oscillometric (cuff-based), arterial BP measurements during mental (Trier social stress test), and physical exercise (bike ergometer). Models were optimized to minimize the root mean squared error and their performance was evaluated against accuracy and regression metrics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The multi-linear regression model demonstrated the highest measurement accuracy for systolic BP with a mean difference of −0.01 mmHg, a standard deviation (SD) of 10.79 mmHg, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 8.20 mmHg, and a correlation coefficient of <i>r</i> = 0.82. In contrast, the support vector regression model achieved the highest accuracy for diastolic BP with a mean difference of 0.15 mmHg, SD = 7.79 mmHg, MEA = 6.05 mmHg, and a correlation coefficient of <i>r</i> = 0.51.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study demonstrates the feasibility of ICG-based machine learning algorithms for estimating cuff-based reference BP. However, further research into limiting biases, improving performance, and standardized validation is needed before clinical use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":107,"journal":{"name":"Acta Physiologica","volume":"241 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based blood pressure estimation using impedance cardiography data\",\"authors\":\"T. L. Bothe,&nbsp;A. Patzak,&nbsp;O. S. Opatz,&nbsp;V. Heinz,&nbsp;N. Pilz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apha.14269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is crucial for the diagnosis, risk assessment, treatment decision-making, and monitoring of cardiovascular diseases. Unfortunately, cuff-based BP measurements suffer from inaccuracies and discomfort. This study is the first to access the feasibility of machine learning-based BP estimation using impedance cardiography (ICG) data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed ICG data from 71 young and healthy adults. Nine different machine learning algorithms were evaluated for their BP estimation performance against quality controlled, oscillometric (cuff-based), arterial BP measurements during mental (Trier social stress test), and physical exercise (bike ergometer). Models were optimized to minimize the root mean squared error and their performance was evaluated against accuracy and regression metrics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The multi-linear regression model demonstrated the highest measurement accuracy for systolic BP with a mean difference of −0.01 mmHg, a standard deviation (SD) of 10.79 mmHg, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 8.20 mmHg, and a correlation coefficient of <i>r</i> = 0.82. In contrast, the support vector regression model achieved the highest accuracy for diastolic BP with a mean difference of 0.15 mmHg, SD = 7.79 mmHg, MEA = 6.05 mmHg, and a correlation coefficient of <i>r</i> = 0.51.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study demonstrates the feasibility of ICG-based machine learning algorithms for estimating cuff-based reference BP. However, further research into limiting biases, improving performance, and standardized validation is needed before clinical use.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Physiologica\",\"volume\":\"241 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726408/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Physiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apha.14269\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Physiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apha.14269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:准确的血压测量对心血管疾病的诊断、风险评估、治疗决策和监测至关重要。不幸的是,基于袖带的血压测量存在不准确和不舒服的问题。这项研究首次利用阻抗心电图(ICG)数据实现基于机器学习的BP估计的可行性。方法:对71例年轻健康成人的ICG数据进行分析。对9种不同的机器学习算法的血压估计性能进行了评估,以对照质量控制、振荡测量(基于袖带)、心理(特里尔社会压力测试)和体育锻炼(自行车计力器)期间的动脉血压测量。优化模型以最小化均方根误差,并根据准确性和回归指标评估其性能。结果:多元线性回归模型的收缩压测量精度最高,平均差值为-0.01 mmHg,标准差(SD)为10.79 mmHg,平均绝对误差(MAE)为8.20 mmHg,相关系数r = 0.82。相比之下,支持向量回归模型对舒张压的准确度最高,平均差值为0.15 mmHg, SD = 7.79 mmHg, MEA = 6.05 mmHg,相关系数r = 0.51。结论:该研究证明了基于icg的机器学习算法用于估计基于袖带的参考BP的可行性。然而,在临床使用之前,需要进一步研究限制偏倚、提高性能和标准化验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine learning-based blood pressure estimation using impedance cardiography data

Machine learning-based blood pressure estimation using impedance cardiography data

Objective

Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is crucial for the diagnosis, risk assessment, treatment decision-making, and monitoring of cardiovascular diseases. Unfortunately, cuff-based BP measurements suffer from inaccuracies and discomfort. This study is the first to access the feasibility of machine learning-based BP estimation using impedance cardiography (ICG) data.

Methods

We analyzed ICG data from 71 young and healthy adults. Nine different machine learning algorithms were evaluated for their BP estimation performance against quality controlled, oscillometric (cuff-based), arterial BP measurements during mental (Trier social stress test), and physical exercise (bike ergometer). Models were optimized to minimize the root mean squared error and their performance was evaluated against accuracy and regression metrics.

Results

The multi-linear regression model demonstrated the highest measurement accuracy for systolic BP with a mean difference of −0.01 mmHg, a standard deviation (SD) of 10.79 mmHg, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 8.20 mmHg, and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.82. In contrast, the support vector regression model achieved the highest accuracy for diastolic BP with a mean difference of 0.15 mmHg, SD = 7.79 mmHg, MEA = 6.05 mmHg, and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.51.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates the feasibility of ICG-based machine learning algorithms for estimating cuff-based reference BP. However, further research into limiting biases, improving performance, and standardized validation is needed before clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Physiologica
Acta Physiologica 医学-生理学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
15.90%
发文量
182
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Physiologica is an important forum for the publication of high quality original research in physiology and related areas by authors from all over the world. Acta Physiologica is a leading journal in human/translational physiology while promoting all aspects of the science of physiology. The journal publishes full length original articles on important new observations as well as reviews and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信