揭示学生心理模式与学习需求:中学生植物营养学模式进展的实证验证

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Oier Pedrera, Oihana Barrutia, José Ramón Díez
{"title":"揭示学生心理模式与学习需求:中学生植物营养学模式进展的实证验证","authors":"Oier Pedrera, Oihana Barrutia, José Ramón Díez","doi":"10.1007/s11165-024-10225-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identifying the mental models held by students has been widely emphasized as being a pivotal aspect of effective science education. In fact, it allows us to understand students’ conceptions, detect teaching-learning difficulties and tailor instruction accordingly. Hence, in this study, the plant nutrition mental models held by upper secondary students were investigated and empirically validated with the aim of detecting the most pressing learning demands and providing instructional guidelines to improve the teaching-learning of the topic. In order to unveil students’ mental models a 5-question open-ended questionnaire was administered to 122 Spanish upper secondary students. Their responses were analyzed through an innovative approach that merged phenomenography and Item Response Theory. Three distinct models emerge from the analysis investigating the sequential development of students’ reasoning. The first and most basic comprises students with heterotrophic explanatory ideas based on intuitive and naïve conceptions. The intermediate model consists of participants who incorporate photosynthesis and plants’ gas exchanges to their models without fully grasping some key underlying concepts probably due to previous misconception inducing instruction. The upper model encompasses the few students who have autotrophic mental models and ideas which resemble the consensus Scientific Model of Plant Nutrition. The findings also reveal that the overall conceptualization level of the participants is relatively low and that several teaching-learning difficulties are strictly linked to each of the different mental models. Finally, the learning demands of the topic are described, and the implications for the teaching-learning designs aimed at overcoming those difficulties are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling Students’ Mental Models and Learning Demands: an Empirical Validation of Secondary Students’ Model Progression on Plant Nutrition\",\"authors\":\"Oier Pedrera, Oihana Barrutia, José Ramón Díez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11165-024-10225-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Identifying the mental models held by students has been widely emphasized as being a pivotal aspect of effective science education. In fact, it allows us to understand students’ conceptions, detect teaching-learning difficulties and tailor instruction accordingly. Hence, in this study, the plant nutrition mental models held by upper secondary students were investigated and empirically validated with the aim of detecting the most pressing learning demands and providing instructional guidelines to improve the teaching-learning of the topic. In order to unveil students’ mental models a 5-question open-ended questionnaire was administered to 122 Spanish upper secondary students. Their responses were analyzed through an innovative approach that merged phenomenography and Item Response Theory. Three distinct models emerge from the analysis investigating the sequential development of students’ reasoning. The first and most basic comprises students with heterotrophic explanatory ideas based on intuitive and naïve conceptions. The intermediate model consists of participants who incorporate photosynthesis and plants’ gas exchanges to their models without fully grasping some key underlying concepts probably due to previous misconception inducing instruction. The upper model encompasses the few students who have autotrophic mental models and ideas which resemble the consensus Scientific Model of Plant Nutrition. The findings also reveal that the overall conceptualization level of the participants is relatively low and that several teaching-learning difficulties are strictly linked to each of the different mental models. Finally, the learning demands of the topic are described, and the implications for the teaching-learning designs aimed at overcoming those difficulties are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10225-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10225-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

识别学生的心理模式已被广泛强调为有效的科学教育的关键方面。事实上,它可以让我们了解学生的概念,发现教与学的困难,并相应地调整教学。因此,本研究对中学生植物营养心理模式进行调查和实证验证,旨在发现中学生最迫切的学习需求,为提高该主题的教与学提供指导。为了揭示学生的心理模式,对122名西班牙高中学生进行了5题开放式问卷调查。他们的反应是通过结合现象和项目反应理论的创新方法来分析的。从调查学生推理的顺序发展的分析中出现了三个不同的模型。第一种也是最基本的一种是基于直觉和naïve概念的异养解释思想的学生。中间模型由参与者组成,他们将光合作用和植物气体交换纳入他们的模型,而没有完全掌握一些关键的潜在概念,这可能是由于先前的误解诱导教学。上层模型包括少数具有自养心理模型和想法的学生,这些模型和想法类似于共识的植物营养科学模型。研究结果还显示,被试的整体概念化水平相对较低,一些教学困难与每种不同的心理模式有严格的联系。最后,本文描述了本课题的学习需求,并讨论了克服这些困难的教学设计的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling Students’ Mental Models and Learning Demands: an Empirical Validation of Secondary Students’ Model Progression on Plant Nutrition

Identifying the mental models held by students has been widely emphasized as being a pivotal aspect of effective science education. In fact, it allows us to understand students’ conceptions, detect teaching-learning difficulties and tailor instruction accordingly. Hence, in this study, the plant nutrition mental models held by upper secondary students were investigated and empirically validated with the aim of detecting the most pressing learning demands and providing instructional guidelines to improve the teaching-learning of the topic. In order to unveil students’ mental models a 5-question open-ended questionnaire was administered to 122 Spanish upper secondary students. Their responses were analyzed through an innovative approach that merged phenomenography and Item Response Theory. Three distinct models emerge from the analysis investigating the sequential development of students’ reasoning. The first and most basic comprises students with heterotrophic explanatory ideas based on intuitive and naïve conceptions. The intermediate model consists of participants who incorporate photosynthesis and plants’ gas exchanges to their models without fully grasping some key underlying concepts probably due to previous misconception inducing instruction. The upper model encompasses the few students who have autotrophic mental models and ideas which resemble the consensus Scientific Model of Plant Nutrition. The findings also reveal that the overall conceptualization level of the participants is relatively low and that several teaching-learning difficulties are strictly linked to each of the different mental models. Finally, the learning demands of the topic are described, and the implications for the teaching-learning designs aimed at overcoming those difficulties are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science Education
Research in Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: 2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021 2020 Impact Factor: 5.439 Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus 2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership. RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal. You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research: Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know. RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted. The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers. Empircal contributions are: Theoretically or conceptually grounded; Relevant to science education theory and practice; Highlight limitations of the study; and Identify possible future research opportunities. From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks. Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is: No longer than 6000 words, including references. Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability; Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education; Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE. While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信