了解个体从急性到慢性致残疼痛的转变:改善护理的机会

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Steven J. Linton , Michael K. Nicholas
{"title":"了解个体从急性到慢性致残疼痛的转变:改善护理的机会","authors":"Steven J. Linton ,&nbsp;Michael K. Nicholas","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.101989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When acute pain persists, it is said to become chronic after 3 months. Considerable interest has focused on why acute pain appears to transition to chronic pain in some cases, but not all, especially when it becomes disabling. We examine our current understanding of the processes involved in the progression from an acute injury to disabling chronic pain. Rather than viewing this progression as a time dependent transition with specific static risk factors, we consider whether it might be more helpful to understand this evolution in terms of unique individual pathways. While brief self-report screening questionnaires assessing risk factors may enable us to stratify patients into risk levels, they do not provide information on the unique context and factors contributing to the disabling pain for each person. It is proposed that a 2-step process combining screening and individual assessment of those at high risk will enhance the prospect of both early identification and individually relevant interventions before more lasting changes emerge. Rather than being concerned with arbitrary time limits, it is argued that by aiming to understand the unique developmental pathway for those individuals identified as high risk, early, preventive interventions will be both viable and effective. Even so, there are barriers to the implementation of early assessment and matched treatments, and these remain a challenge for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101989"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the individual's transition from acute to chronic disabling pain: Opportunities for improved care\",\"authors\":\"Steven J. Linton ,&nbsp;Michael K. Nicholas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.101989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>When acute pain persists, it is said to become chronic after 3 months. Considerable interest has focused on why acute pain appears to transition to chronic pain in some cases, but not all, especially when it becomes disabling. We examine our current understanding of the processes involved in the progression from an acute injury to disabling chronic pain. Rather than viewing this progression as a time dependent transition with specific static risk factors, we consider whether it might be more helpful to understand this evolution in terms of unique individual pathways. While brief self-report screening questionnaires assessing risk factors may enable us to stratify patients into risk levels, they do not provide information on the unique context and factors contributing to the disabling pain for each person. It is proposed that a 2-step process combining screening and individual assessment of those at high risk will enhance the prospect of both early identification and individually relevant interventions before more lasting changes emerge. Rather than being concerned with arbitrary time limits, it is argued that by aiming to understand the unique developmental pathway for those individuals identified as high risk, early, preventive interventions will be both viable and effective. Even so, there are barriers to the implementation of early assessment and matched treatments, and these remain a challenge for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25000028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25000028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当急性疼痛持续时,据说3个月后变为慢性疼痛。相当大的兴趣集中在为什么急性疼痛似乎过渡到慢性疼痛在某些情况下,但不是全部,特别是当它成为致残。我们检查我们目前的理解过程涉及从急性损伤到致残慢性疼痛的进展。与其将这种进展视为具有特定静态风险因素的时间依赖性转变,我们考虑从独特的个体途径来理解这种演变是否可能更有帮助。虽然评估风险因素的简短自我报告筛选问卷可能使我们能够将患者分层到风险水平,但它们并不能提供导致每个人致残疼痛的独特背景和因素的信息。建议对高危人群进行筛查和个人评估的两步过程将提高早期识别和个人相关干预的前景,然后再出现更持久的变化。而不是关心武断的时间限制,有人认为,通过旨在了解那些被确定为高风险的个体的独特发展途径,早期的预防性干预将是既可行又有效的。即便如此,早期评估和匹配治疗的实施仍然存在障碍,这些仍然是未来研究的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the individual's transition from acute to chronic disabling pain: Opportunities for improved care
When acute pain persists, it is said to become chronic after 3 months. Considerable interest has focused on why acute pain appears to transition to chronic pain in some cases, but not all, especially when it becomes disabling. We examine our current understanding of the processes involved in the progression from an acute injury to disabling chronic pain. Rather than viewing this progression as a time dependent transition with specific static risk factors, we consider whether it might be more helpful to understand this evolution in terms of unique individual pathways. While brief self-report screening questionnaires assessing risk factors may enable us to stratify patients into risk levels, they do not provide information on the unique context and factors contributing to the disabling pain for each person. It is proposed that a 2-step process combining screening and individual assessment of those at high risk will enhance the prospect of both early identification and individually relevant interventions before more lasting changes emerge. Rather than being concerned with arbitrary time limits, it is argued that by aiming to understand the unique developmental pathway for those individuals identified as high risk, early, preventive interventions will be both viable and effective. Even so, there are barriers to the implementation of early assessment and matched treatments, and these remain a challenge for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信