为什么他们会坚持?了解活体肾供者和持久性。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Kelly L. Nottingham , Hallie Klosterman , Olivia Prevost , Rebekah Perkins Crawford
{"title":"为什么他们会坚持?了解活体肾供者和持久性。","authors":"Kelly L. Nottingham ,&nbsp;Hallie Klosterman ,&nbsp;Olivia Prevost ,&nbsp;Rebekah Perkins Crawford","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.12.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many participants persist through the living kidney donation process, although it is challenging, multifaceted, and burdensome, particularly during the predonation evaluation (PDE) phase. This study uses a constructivist grounded theory approach to analyze the experiences of living kidney donors (LKDs) undergoing evaluation who shared their perspectives in blog reflections. One hundred five (105) blog posts met the inclusion criteria. They generated three overarching themes: (1) Facilitators to completing the PDE qualification process, (2) Burdens experienced during the PDE qualification process, and (3) Tools to mitigate burdens or enhance facilitators. Internal facilitators, such as the desire to help and other motivating emotions, emerged as key drivers for LKDs to persist through the donation process. Religious belief or faith, an external facilitator, is also crucial in motivating donors. Conversely, internal burdens, such as doubts, fears, financial concerns, and health risks, posed challenges to the donation process. External burdens also included recipient relationship management, delays and setbacks, poor communication, qualification testing, lack of support, and being denied as a donor. This study's findings shed light on the complex interplay between burdens, facilitators, and tools in shaping the experiences of LKDs during the PDE, which enabled their persistence through the process and highlights a potential persistence spectrum. The insights gained from this research can inform interventions to better support living kidney donors throughout their donation journey, enhancing the overall donor experience and potentially increasing the number of living kidney donations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 2","pages":"Pages 223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Do They Persist? Understanding Living Kidney Donors and Persistence\",\"authors\":\"Kelly L. Nottingham ,&nbsp;Hallie Klosterman ,&nbsp;Olivia Prevost ,&nbsp;Rebekah Perkins Crawford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.12.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many participants persist through the living kidney donation process, although it is challenging, multifaceted, and burdensome, particularly during the predonation evaluation (PDE) phase. This study uses a constructivist grounded theory approach to analyze the experiences of living kidney donors (LKDs) undergoing evaluation who shared their perspectives in blog reflections. One hundred five (105) blog posts met the inclusion criteria. They generated three overarching themes: (1) Facilitators to completing the PDE qualification process, (2) Burdens experienced during the PDE qualification process, and (3) Tools to mitigate burdens or enhance facilitators. Internal facilitators, such as the desire to help and other motivating emotions, emerged as key drivers for LKDs to persist through the donation process. Religious belief or faith, an external facilitator, is also crucial in motivating donors. Conversely, internal burdens, such as doubts, fears, financial concerns, and health risks, posed challenges to the donation process. External burdens also included recipient relationship management, delays and setbacks, poor communication, qualification testing, lack of support, and being denied as a donor. This study's findings shed light on the complex interplay between burdens, facilitators, and tools in shaping the experiences of LKDs during the PDE, which enabled their persistence through the process and highlights a potential persistence spectrum. The insights gained from this research can inform interventions to better support living kidney donors throughout their donation journey, enhancing the overall donor experience and potentially increasing the number of living kidney donations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 223-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524006894\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524006894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多参与者坚持通过活体肾脏捐赠过程,尽管它是具有挑战性的,多方面的,和负担,特别是在捐赠前评估(PDE)阶段。本研究以建构主义理论为基础,分析接受评估的活体肾脏捐赠者(LKDs)的经验,这些人在部落格中分享他们的观点。105篇博客文章符合入选标准。他们产生了三个总体主题:(1)完成PDE资格认证过程的促进者;(2)PDE资格认证过程中经历的负担;(3)减轻负担或增强促进者的工具。内部因素,如帮助他人的愿望和其他激励情绪,成为lkd坚持完成捐赠过程的关键驱动因素。宗教信仰或信仰作为一种外部促进者,在激励捐助者方面也至关重要。相反,内部负担,如疑虑、恐惧、财务担忧和健康风险,对捐赠过程构成挑战。外部负担还包括受援国关系管理、延误和挫折、沟通不端、资格测试、缺乏支持以及被拒绝成为援助国。这项研究的发现揭示了负担、促进因素和工具之间复杂的相互作用,这些相互作用在PDE期间塑造了lkd的经历,从而使他们能够在整个过程中保持持久性,并突出了潜在的持久性范围。从这项研究中获得的见解可以为干预措施提供信息,以便在整个捐赠过程中更好地支持活体肾脏捐赠者,提高整体捐赠体验,并有可能增加活体肾脏捐赠的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Do They Persist? Understanding Living Kidney Donors and Persistence
Many participants persist through the living kidney donation process, although it is challenging, multifaceted, and burdensome, particularly during the predonation evaluation (PDE) phase. This study uses a constructivist grounded theory approach to analyze the experiences of living kidney donors (LKDs) undergoing evaluation who shared their perspectives in blog reflections. One hundred five (105) blog posts met the inclusion criteria. They generated three overarching themes: (1) Facilitators to completing the PDE qualification process, (2) Burdens experienced during the PDE qualification process, and (3) Tools to mitigate burdens or enhance facilitators. Internal facilitators, such as the desire to help and other motivating emotions, emerged as key drivers for LKDs to persist through the donation process. Religious belief or faith, an external facilitator, is also crucial in motivating donors. Conversely, internal burdens, such as doubts, fears, financial concerns, and health risks, posed challenges to the donation process. External burdens also included recipient relationship management, delays and setbacks, poor communication, qualification testing, lack of support, and being denied as a donor. This study's findings shed light on the complex interplay between burdens, facilitators, and tools in shaping the experiences of LKDs during the PDE, which enabled their persistence through the process and highlights a potential persistence spectrum. The insights gained from this research can inform interventions to better support living kidney donors throughout their donation journey, enhancing the overall donor experience and potentially increasing the number of living kidney donations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信