Satish Vishwanathaiah, Prabhadevi C Maganur, Shahad Mohammed Maafa, Asayil Mohammed Tulays, May Mohammed Hakami, Nassreen H Albar, Noura Alessa, Khalid Alhakami, Ali Ahmed Assiry, Amjad Ismail Alfaqih, Ather Ahmed Syed
{"title":"一项随机临床研究:评估儿童使用智能钎与硬质合金钎的除龋效果和疼痛感知。","authors":"Satish Vishwanathaiah, Prabhadevi C Maganur, Shahad Mohammed Maafa, Asayil Mohammed Tulays, May Mohammed Hakami, Nassreen H Albar, Noura Alessa, Khalid Alhakami, Ali Ahmed Assiry, Amjad Ismail Alfaqih, Ather Ahmed Syed","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Dental caries removal is conventionally done using carbide burs, but non-metallic polymer burs have recently been developed with the aim of being more selective and causing less pain. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of caries removal, time taken, and patient compliance during restorations using smart bur and carbide burs in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A clinical study was designed and conducted at the Pedodontics Outpatient Department, with a focus on 40 children between 6 and 12 years old, who were split into 2 groups consisting of 20 children each: group 1, using a carbide conventional rotary bur, and group 2, using a smart bur. Efficiency of caries removal was assessed using the Ericson scale. The Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale (WBS) were used to assess the intensity of pain, and the behavior of children was assessed using the Frankel behavior rating scale (FBRS). RESULTS A statistically significant difference (P<0.001) was noted in the time taken for caries excavation and Ericson scale (P=0.04), with higher scores observed in the smart bur group. The smart bur group generally reported lower WBS and FLACC scores than the carbide bur group, during caries excavation, restoration and local anesthesia administration, and this difference was very highly significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pain perception among children was lesser and overall satisfaction was higher in smart bur group whereas caries removal efficiency was higher in conventional carbide bur group.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"31 ","pages":"e946802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Caries Removal Efficacy and Pain Perception in Children, Using Smart Bur Versus Carbide Bur: A Randomized Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Satish Vishwanathaiah, Prabhadevi C Maganur, Shahad Mohammed Maafa, Asayil Mohammed Tulays, May Mohammed Hakami, Nassreen H Albar, Noura Alessa, Khalid Alhakami, Ali Ahmed Assiry, Amjad Ismail Alfaqih, Ather Ahmed Syed\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.946802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Dental caries removal is conventionally done using carbide burs, but non-metallic polymer burs have recently been developed with the aim of being more selective and causing less pain. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of caries removal, time taken, and patient compliance during restorations using smart bur and carbide burs in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A clinical study was designed and conducted at the Pedodontics Outpatient Department, with a focus on 40 children between 6 and 12 years old, who were split into 2 groups consisting of 20 children each: group 1, using a carbide conventional rotary bur, and group 2, using a smart bur. Efficiency of caries removal was assessed using the Ericson scale. The Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale (WBS) were used to assess the intensity of pain, and the behavior of children was assessed using the Frankel behavior rating scale (FBRS). RESULTS A statistically significant difference (P<0.001) was noted in the time taken for caries excavation and Ericson scale (P=0.04), with higher scores observed in the smart bur group. The smart bur group generally reported lower WBS and FLACC scores than the carbide bur group, during caries excavation, restoration and local anesthesia administration, and this difference was very highly significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pain perception among children was lesser and overall satisfaction was higher in smart bur group whereas caries removal efficiency was higher in conventional carbide bur group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"e946802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737275/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946802\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
传统的龋齿清除是使用硬质合金毛刺完成的,但是非金属聚合物毛刺最近被开发出来,目的是更有选择性和造成更少的疼痛。本研究的目的是评估和比较儿童患者在使用智能牙钉和硬质合金牙钉修复过程中除龋的有效性、所需时间和患者依从性。材料与方法在儿科门诊部设计并进行了一项临床研究,重点研究了40名6 - 12岁的儿童,将其分为两组,每组20名儿童:第一组使用硬质合金传统旋转钎,第二组使用智能钎。采用埃里克森量表评估除龋效率。采用Face - Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC)和Wong-Baker FACES疼痛评定量表(WBS)评估疼痛强度,采用Frankel行为评定量表(FBRS)评估儿童行为。结果:差异有统计学意义(P
Assessing Caries Removal Efficacy and Pain Perception in Children, Using Smart Bur Versus Carbide Bur: A Randomized Clinical Study.
BACKGROUND Dental caries removal is conventionally done using carbide burs, but non-metallic polymer burs have recently been developed with the aim of being more selective and causing less pain. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of caries removal, time taken, and patient compliance during restorations using smart bur and carbide burs in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A clinical study was designed and conducted at the Pedodontics Outpatient Department, with a focus on 40 children between 6 and 12 years old, who were split into 2 groups consisting of 20 children each: group 1, using a carbide conventional rotary bur, and group 2, using a smart bur. Efficiency of caries removal was assessed using the Ericson scale. The Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale (WBS) were used to assess the intensity of pain, and the behavior of children was assessed using the Frankel behavior rating scale (FBRS). RESULTS A statistically significant difference (P<0.001) was noted in the time taken for caries excavation and Ericson scale (P=0.04), with higher scores observed in the smart bur group. The smart bur group generally reported lower WBS and FLACC scores than the carbide bur group, during caries excavation, restoration and local anesthesia administration, and this difference was very highly significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pain perception among children was lesser and overall satisfaction was higher in smart bur group whereas caries removal efficiency was higher in conventional carbide bur group.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.