儿科患者开放与腹腔镜II期Fowler-Stephens兰花切除术的前瞻性比较研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Raashid Hamid, Akshit Sudanshu, Mir Fahiem-Ul-Hassan, Ubayer Nabi, Waseem Jan Shah, Nisar A Bhat, Ajaz A Baba, Gowhar Nazir Mufti, Idrees Bashir, Fayaz Ahmad
{"title":"儿科患者开放与腹腔镜II期Fowler-Stephens兰花切除术的前瞻性比较研究。","authors":"Raashid Hamid, Akshit Sudanshu, Mir Fahiem-Ul-Hassan, Ubayer Nabi, Waseem Jan Shah, Nisar A Bhat, Ajaz A Baba, Gowhar Nazir Mufti, Idrees Bashir, Fayaz Ahmad","doi":"10.1177/03915603241313025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic Fowler Stephens orchidopexy, single stage or two-stage, is now routinely performed in non-palpable testis. We performed second stage orchidopexy as open inguinal approach and compared the outcome of this approach to two-staged laparoscopic orchidopexy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective randomized interventional study of two different approaches for intra-abdominal testis. In group A, Laparoscopic stage I (SFO) followed by open inguinal orchidopexy was compared for final outcome in group B cases, who underwent laparoscopic staged SF orchidopexy. The average duration between stage I SF and stage II SF was 6 months. All the procedures were done under GA and caudal analgesia. The pre-operative and post-operative USG dimensions were compared in cm and cm<sup>3</sup>/ml. The procedure outcome was considered successful if testis remained inside scrotum below mid-scrotal point. Any testis above the mid-scrotal point was considered as unacceptable or failure of procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study was performed on 74 children with 84 testis (group 'A' 38 patients (48 testis) and group 'B' 36 patients (46 testes)), with average age was 3.3 ± 0.46 and 3.9 ± 0.58 years, respectively. In group 'A', 38 patients (48 testes) underwent lap SFO I followed by inguinal orchidopexy and in group 'B', 36 patients (46 testes) underwent laparoscopic staged SF O. The mean testicular volume pre-operative in group 'A' & 'B' was 0.28 ± 0.04 and 0.23 ± 0.06 cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The mean post-operative testicular volume was 0.34 ± 0.07 and 0.28 ± 0.05 cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The average follow-up of the patients in group 'A' & 'B' was 24 ± 3.67 and 20 ± 2.90 months, respectively. Testis was having good volume in 87.5% and 76.60% of these successful cases, respectively. There were (3/48) 6.25% (4/46) 8.69% testicular atrophy cases in group 'A' & 'B', respectively. The differences were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean operative time in group A was 20 ± 8.07 min and group B 30 ± 7.19 min in stage II procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The success rate in group A was more than the group B which was statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Our study connotes that open stage II orchidopexy is still feasible and practicable with better final outcome of management of non-palpable cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603241313025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective comparative study of open versus laparoscopic stage II Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy in pediatric patients.\",\"authors\":\"Raashid Hamid, Akshit Sudanshu, Mir Fahiem-Ul-Hassan, Ubayer Nabi, Waseem Jan Shah, Nisar A Bhat, Ajaz A Baba, Gowhar Nazir Mufti, Idrees Bashir, Fayaz Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03915603241313025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic Fowler Stephens orchidopexy, single stage or two-stage, is now routinely performed in non-palpable testis. We performed second stage orchidopexy as open inguinal approach and compared the outcome of this approach to two-staged laparoscopic orchidopexy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective randomized interventional study of two different approaches for intra-abdominal testis. In group A, Laparoscopic stage I (SFO) followed by open inguinal orchidopexy was compared for final outcome in group B cases, who underwent laparoscopic staged SF orchidopexy. The average duration between stage I SF and stage II SF was 6 months. All the procedures were done under GA and caudal analgesia. The pre-operative and post-operative USG dimensions were compared in cm and cm<sup>3</sup>/ml. The procedure outcome was considered successful if testis remained inside scrotum below mid-scrotal point. Any testis above the mid-scrotal point was considered as unacceptable or failure of procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study was performed on 74 children with 84 testis (group 'A' 38 patients (48 testis) and group 'B' 36 patients (46 testes)), with average age was 3.3 ± 0.46 and 3.9 ± 0.58 years, respectively. In group 'A', 38 patients (48 testes) underwent lap SFO I followed by inguinal orchidopexy and in group 'B', 36 patients (46 testes) underwent laparoscopic staged SF O. The mean testicular volume pre-operative in group 'A' & 'B' was 0.28 ± 0.04 and 0.23 ± 0.06 cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The mean post-operative testicular volume was 0.34 ± 0.07 and 0.28 ± 0.05 cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The average follow-up of the patients in group 'A' & 'B' was 24 ± 3.67 and 20 ± 2.90 months, respectively. Testis was having good volume in 87.5% and 76.60% of these successful cases, respectively. There were (3/48) 6.25% (4/46) 8.69% testicular atrophy cases in group 'A' & 'B', respectively. The differences were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean operative time in group A was 20 ± 8.07 min and group B 30 ± 7.19 min in stage II procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The success rate in group A was more than the group B which was statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Our study connotes that open stage II orchidopexy is still feasible and practicable with better final outcome of management of non-palpable cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3915603241313025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241313025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241313025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹腔镜福勒斯蒂芬斯睾丸切除术,单期或两期,现在常规用于不可触及的睾丸。我们采用开放的腹股沟入路进行第二阶段睾丸切除术,并将其与两阶段腹腔镜睾丸切除术的结果进行比较。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性随机介入研究,采用两种不同的入路治疗腹内睾丸。在A组中,比较腹腔镜I期(SFO)和开放式腹股沟睾丸切除术的最终结果,B组患者接受腹腔镜分期SF睾丸切除术。I期和II期SF的平均持续时间为6个月。所有手术均在GA和尾侧镇痛下进行。比较术前、术后USG尺寸(cm、cm3/ml)。如果睾丸仍在阴囊中点以下的阴囊内,则认为手术结果成功。任何高于阴囊中点的睾丸被认为是不可接受的或手术失败。结果:本研究共纳入74例儿童84个睾丸,其中A组38例(48个睾丸),B组36例(46个睾丸),平均年龄分别为3.3±0.46岁和3.9±0.58岁。A组38例(48个睾丸)行单膝SFO +腹股沟睾丸切除术,B组36例(46个睾丸)行腹腔镜分期SFO。A组和B组术前平均睾丸体积分别为0.28±0.04和0.23±0.06 cm2。术后平均睾丸体积分别为0.34±0.07和0.28±0.05 cm2。A、B组患者平均随访时间分别为24±3.67、20±2.90个月。成功病例中睾丸体积良好的分别占87.5%和76.60%。A组和B组睾丸萎缩发生率分别为(3/48)6.25%(4/46)8.69%。结论:A组手术成功率明显高于B组,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。我们的研究表明,开放性II期睾丸切除术仍然是可行的和可行的,对不可触及病例的最终治疗效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prospective comparative study of open versus laparoscopic stage II Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy in pediatric patients.

Introduction: Laparoscopic Fowler Stephens orchidopexy, single stage or two-stage, is now routinely performed in non-palpable testis. We performed second stage orchidopexy as open inguinal approach and compared the outcome of this approach to two-staged laparoscopic orchidopexy.

Methods: We performed a prospective randomized interventional study of two different approaches for intra-abdominal testis. In group A, Laparoscopic stage I (SFO) followed by open inguinal orchidopexy was compared for final outcome in group B cases, who underwent laparoscopic staged SF orchidopexy. The average duration between stage I SF and stage II SF was 6 months. All the procedures were done under GA and caudal analgesia. The pre-operative and post-operative USG dimensions were compared in cm and cm3/ml. The procedure outcome was considered successful if testis remained inside scrotum below mid-scrotal point. Any testis above the mid-scrotal point was considered as unacceptable or failure of procedure.

Results: This study was performed on 74 children with 84 testis (group 'A' 38 patients (48 testis) and group 'B' 36 patients (46 testes)), with average age was 3.3 ± 0.46 and 3.9 ± 0.58 years, respectively. In group 'A', 38 patients (48 testes) underwent lap SFO I followed by inguinal orchidopexy and in group 'B', 36 patients (46 testes) underwent laparoscopic staged SF O. The mean testicular volume pre-operative in group 'A' & 'B' was 0.28 ± 0.04 and 0.23 ± 0.06 cm2, respectively. The mean post-operative testicular volume was 0.34 ± 0.07 and 0.28 ± 0.05 cm2, respectively. The average follow-up of the patients in group 'A' & 'B' was 24 ± 3.67 and 20 ± 2.90 months, respectively. Testis was having good volume in 87.5% and 76.60% of these successful cases, respectively. There were (3/48) 6.25% (4/46) 8.69% testicular atrophy cases in group 'A' & 'B', respectively. The differences were not statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mean operative time in group A was 20 ± 8.07 min and group B 30 ± 7.19 min in stage II procedure.

Conclusion: The success rate in group A was more than the group B which was statistically significant (p > 0.05). Our study connotes that open stage II orchidopexy is still feasible and practicable with better final outcome of management of non-palpable cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信