基于hts的三种病毒和一种类病毒多重检测的比较模板转换cDNA方法

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Francisco Mosquera-Yuqui, Daniel Ramos-Lopez, Xiaojun Hu, Yu Yang, Joshua L Mendoza, Emmanuel Asare, Joshua Habiger, Oscar P Hurtado-Gonzales, Andres S Espindola
{"title":"基于hts的三种病毒和一种类病毒多重检测的比较模板转换cDNA方法","authors":"Francisco Mosquera-Yuqui, Daniel Ramos-Lopez, Xiaojun Hu, Yu Yang, Joshua L Mendoza, Emmanuel Asare, Joshua Habiger, Oscar P Hurtado-Gonzales, Andres S Espindola","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-86065-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exclusion is a keystone of integrated pest management to prevent the introduction of pathogens. U.S. plant quarantine programs employ PCR and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) to test imported plants for viruses and viroids of concern. Achieving a low limit of detection in any HTS protocol could be challenging. Following a template-switching cDNA amplification protocol, seven cDNA synthesis treatments were used to test simultaneously the relative abundance and coverage of the three most commonly latent RNA viruses found in apples: apple chlorotic leaf spot virus, apple stem grooving virus, and apple stem pitting virus, as well as the viroid apple hammerhead viroid. Amplified double-stranded cDNAs were subjected to library preparation using Nanopore SQK-DCS109 and Illumina Nextera XT, and sequenced with MinION and NextSeq2000, respectively. Treatments with oligo d(T)23-VN or its combination with random hexamers yielded the highest relative reads for viruses, while treatments containing the reverse primer pool produced more relative reads for AHVd. These treatments and random hexamers also generated the highest genome coverages, which were typically similar in both HTS workflows. However, relative abundances of viruses determined with SQK-DCS109 were up to 2.22-fold higher compared to Nextera XT. In contrast, Nextera XT yielded viroid reads 3.30-fold higher than SQK-DCS109. A framework of considerations for expanding this sensitive approach to other targets and crops is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"1657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative template-switching cDNA approach for HTS-based multiplex detection of three viruses and one viroid commonly found in apple trees.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Mosquera-Yuqui, Daniel Ramos-Lopez, Xiaojun Hu, Yu Yang, Joshua L Mendoza, Emmanuel Asare, Joshua Habiger, Oscar P Hurtado-Gonzales, Andres S Espindola\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-86065-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exclusion is a keystone of integrated pest management to prevent the introduction of pathogens. U.S. plant quarantine programs employ PCR and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) to test imported plants for viruses and viroids of concern. Achieving a low limit of detection in any HTS protocol could be challenging. Following a template-switching cDNA amplification protocol, seven cDNA synthesis treatments were used to test simultaneously the relative abundance and coverage of the three most commonly latent RNA viruses found in apples: apple chlorotic leaf spot virus, apple stem grooving virus, and apple stem pitting virus, as well as the viroid apple hammerhead viroid. Amplified double-stranded cDNAs were subjected to library preparation using Nanopore SQK-DCS109 and Illumina Nextera XT, and sequenced with MinION and NextSeq2000, respectively. Treatments with oligo d(T)23-VN or its combination with random hexamers yielded the highest relative reads for viruses, while treatments containing the reverse primer pool produced more relative reads for AHVd. These treatments and random hexamers also generated the highest genome coverages, which were typically similar in both HTS workflows. However, relative abundances of viruses determined with SQK-DCS109 were up to 2.22-fold higher compared to Nextera XT. In contrast, Nextera XT yielded viroid reads 3.30-fold higher than SQK-DCS109. A framework of considerations for expanding this sensitive approach to other targets and crops is discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"1657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86065-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86065-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

排除是综合虫害管理防止病原体传入的关键。美国植物检疫项目采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和高通量测序(HTS)对进口植物进行病毒和类病毒检测。在任何HTS协议中实现低检测极限都可能具有挑战性。采用模板切换cDNA扩增方法,采用7个cDNA合成处理,同时检测了苹果中3种最常见的潜伏RNA病毒的相对丰度和覆盖范围:苹果萎黄叶斑病病毒、苹果茎沟槽病毒、苹果茎麻点病毒以及类病毒苹果锤头病毒。扩增的双链cdna分别使用Nanopore SQK-DCS109和Illumina Nextera XT进行文库制备,并分别使用MinION和NextSeq2000进行测序。oligo d(T)23-VN或其与随机六聚体的组合对病毒产生最高的相对reads,而含有反向引物池的处理对AHVd产生更多的相对reads。这些处理和随机六聚体也产生了最高的基因组覆盖率,这在两个HTS工作流程中通常是相似的。然而,SQK-DCS109检测的病毒相对丰度比Nextera XT高出2.22倍。相比之下,Nextera XT获得的类病毒读数比SQK-DCS109高3.3倍。讨论了将这种敏感方法扩展到其他目标和作物的考虑框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A comparative template-switching cDNA approach for HTS-based multiplex detection of three viruses and one viroid commonly found in apple trees.

A comparative template-switching cDNA approach for HTS-based multiplex detection of three viruses and one viroid commonly found in apple trees.

A comparative template-switching cDNA approach for HTS-based multiplex detection of three viruses and one viroid commonly found in apple trees.

Exclusion is a keystone of integrated pest management to prevent the introduction of pathogens. U.S. plant quarantine programs employ PCR and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) to test imported plants for viruses and viroids of concern. Achieving a low limit of detection in any HTS protocol could be challenging. Following a template-switching cDNA amplification protocol, seven cDNA synthesis treatments were used to test simultaneously the relative abundance and coverage of the three most commonly latent RNA viruses found in apples: apple chlorotic leaf spot virus, apple stem grooving virus, and apple stem pitting virus, as well as the viroid apple hammerhead viroid. Amplified double-stranded cDNAs were subjected to library preparation using Nanopore SQK-DCS109 and Illumina Nextera XT, and sequenced with MinION and NextSeq2000, respectively. Treatments with oligo d(T)23-VN or its combination with random hexamers yielded the highest relative reads for viruses, while treatments containing the reverse primer pool produced more relative reads for AHVd. These treatments and random hexamers also generated the highest genome coverages, which were typically similar in both HTS workflows. However, relative abundances of viruses determined with SQK-DCS109 were up to 2.22-fold higher compared to Nextera XT. In contrast, Nextera XT yielded viroid reads 3.30-fold higher than SQK-DCS109. A framework of considerations for expanding this sensitive approach to other targets and crops is discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信