炎症性风湿病患者注射生物抗风湿药物后的疲劳模式:一项生态瞬时评估研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Jette A van Lint, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Naomi T Jessurun, Alfons A den Broeder, Bart J F van den Bemt, Victor J B Huiskes
{"title":"炎症性风湿病患者注射生物抗风湿药物后的疲劳模式:一项生态瞬时评估研究","authors":"Jette A van Lint, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Naomi T Jessurun, Alfons A den Broeder, Bart J F van den Bemt, Victor J B Huiskes","doi":"10.1007/s00296-024-05779-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated severity, course and patterns of fatigue surrounding subcutaneous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) injection in inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) patients using ecological momentary assessments and investigated self-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this prospective cohort study, IRD patients completed fatigue severity numeric rating scales (0-10) in web-based ecological momentary assessments in three waves of five days surrounding bDMARD injection. The course of fatigue was measured by the change in fatigue from pre-dosing to post-dosing scores and was classified as: worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change. A pattern was defined as a course of worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves for patients completing assessments across all three waves. ADRs could be reported on day five of each wave. In total 609 participants completed ecological momentary assessments surrounding 1541 bDMARD injections. Overall average fatigue severity across all three waves was 4.5 (± SD 2.4) and 78% experienced severe fatigue in at least one assessment. Of 398 patients completing all three waves, 61% had no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves, 13% had a pattern of worsening fatigue and 18% had a pattern of improving fatigue. Of 398 patients, 36% had a consistent pattern in all three waves. IRD patients using a bDMARD may consistently experience specific fatigue patterns surrounding bDMARD administration. These patterns provide insights for clinical practice and could be used to inform patients properly.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue patterns surrounding biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug injection in patients with an inflammatory rheumatic disease: an ecological momentary assessment study.\",\"authors\":\"Jette A van Lint, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Naomi T Jessurun, Alfons A den Broeder, Bart J F van den Bemt, Victor J B Huiskes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-024-05779-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated severity, course and patterns of fatigue surrounding subcutaneous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) injection in inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) patients using ecological momentary assessments and investigated self-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this prospective cohort study, IRD patients completed fatigue severity numeric rating scales (0-10) in web-based ecological momentary assessments in three waves of five days surrounding bDMARD injection. The course of fatigue was measured by the change in fatigue from pre-dosing to post-dosing scores and was classified as: worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change. A pattern was defined as a course of worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves for patients completing assessments across all three waves. ADRs could be reported on day five of each wave. In total 609 participants completed ecological momentary assessments surrounding 1541 bDMARD injections. Overall average fatigue severity across all three waves was 4.5 (± SD 2.4) and 78% experienced severe fatigue in at least one assessment. Of 398 patients completing all three waves, 61% had no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves, 13% had a pattern of worsening fatigue and 18% had a pattern of improving fatigue. Of 398 patients, 36% had a consistent pattern in all three waves. IRD patients using a bDMARD may consistently experience specific fatigue patterns surrounding bDMARD administration. These patterns provide insights for clinical practice and could be used to inform patients properly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724786/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05779-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05779-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用生态瞬间评估的方法调查了炎症性风湿病(IRD)患者皮下注射生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物(bDMARD)周围疲劳的严重程度、病程和模式,并调查了自我报告的药物不良反应(adr)。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,IRD患者在注射bDMARD前后5天的三波中完成了基于网络的生态瞬间评估的疲劳严重程度数值评定量表(0-10)。通过给药前到给药后疲劳评分的变化来测量疲劳的过程,并将其分为:恶化、改善或无临床相关变化。模式定义为在完成所有三个阶段评估的患者中,至少在三个阶段中的两个阶段出现疲劳恶化、改善或无临床相关变化的过程。adr可在每波的第五天报告。总共609名参与者完成了1541次bDMARD注射前后的生态瞬时评估。所有三波的总体平均疲劳严重程度为4.5(±SD 2.4), 78%的人在至少一次评估中经历了严重的疲劳。在398名患者中,61%的患者在三波中至少两波没有临床相关的疲劳变化,13%的患者有疲劳恶化的模式,18%的患者有疲劳改善的模式。在398名患者中,36%的患者在所有三波中都有一致的模式。使用bDMARD的IRD患者在服用bDMARD时可能会持续经历特定的疲劳模式。这些模式为临床实践提供了见解,并可用于正确告知患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fatigue patterns surrounding biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug injection in patients with an inflammatory rheumatic disease: an ecological momentary assessment study.

This study investigated severity, course and patterns of fatigue surrounding subcutaneous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) injection in inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) patients using ecological momentary assessments and investigated self-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this prospective cohort study, IRD patients completed fatigue severity numeric rating scales (0-10) in web-based ecological momentary assessments in three waves of five days surrounding bDMARD injection. The course of fatigue was measured by the change in fatigue from pre-dosing to post-dosing scores and was classified as: worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change. A pattern was defined as a course of worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves for patients completing assessments across all three waves. ADRs could be reported on day five of each wave. In total 609 participants completed ecological momentary assessments surrounding 1541 bDMARD injections. Overall average fatigue severity across all three waves was 4.5 (± SD 2.4) and 78% experienced severe fatigue in at least one assessment. Of 398 patients completing all three waves, 61% had no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves, 13% had a pattern of worsening fatigue and 18% had a pattern of improving fatigue. Of 398 patients, 36% had a consistent pattern in all three waves. IRD patients using a bDMARD may consistently experience specific fatigue patterns surrounding bDMARD administration. These patterns provide insights for clinical practice and could be used to inform patients properly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信