Jette A van Lint, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Naomi T Jessurun, Alfons A den Broeder, Bart J F van den Bemt, Victor J B Huiskes
{"title":"炎症性风湿病患者注射生物抗风湿药物后的疲劳模式:一项生态瞬时评估研究","authors":"Jette A van Lint, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Naomi T Jessurun, Alfons A den Broeder, Bart J F van den Bemt, Victor J B Huiskes","doi":"10.1007/s00296-024-05779-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated severity, course and patterns of fatigue surrounding subcutaneous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) injection in inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) patients using ecological momentary assessments and investigated self-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this prospective cohort study, IRD patients completed fatigue severity numeric rating scales (0-10) in web-based ecological momentary assessments in three waves of five days surrounding bDMARD injection. The course of fatigue was measured by the change in fatigue from pre-dosing to post-dosing scores and was classified as: worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change. A pattern was defined as a course of worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves for patients completing assessments across all three waves. ADRs could be reported on day five of each wave. In total 609 participants completed ecological momentary assessments surrounding 1541 bDMARD injections. Overall average fatigue severity across all three waves was 4.5 (± SD 2.4) and 78% experienced severe fatigue in at least one assessment. Of 398 patients completing all three waves, 61% had no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves, 13% had a pattern of worsening fatigue and 18% had a pattern of improving fatigue. Of 398 patients, 36% had a consistent pattern in all three waves. IRD patients using a bDMARD may consistently experience specific fatigue patterns surrounding bDMARD administration. These patterns provide insights for clinical practice and could be used to inform patients properly.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue patterns surrounding biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug injection in patients with an inflammatory rheumatic disease: an ecological momentary assessment study.\",\"authors\":\"Jette A van Lint, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Naomi T Jessurun, Alfons A den Broeder, Bart J F van den Bemt, Victor J B Huiskes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-024-05779-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated severity, course and patterns of fatigue surrounding subcutaneous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) injection in inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) patients using ecological momentary assessments and investigated self-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this prospective cohort study, IRD patients completed fatigue severity numeric rating scales (0-10) in web-based ecological momentary assessments in three waves of five days surrounding bDMARD injection. The course of fatigue was measured by the change in fatigue from pre-dosing to post-dosing scores and was classified as: worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change. A pattern was defined as a course of worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves for patients completing assessments across all three waves. ADRs could be reported on day five of each wave. In total 609 participants completed ecological momentary assessments surrounding 1541 bDMARD injections. Overall average fatigue severity across all three waves was 4.5 (± SD 2.4) and 78% experienced severe fatigue in at least one assessment. Of 398 patients completing all three waves, 61% had no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves, 13% had a pattern of worsening fatigue and 18% had a pattern of improving fatigue. Of 398 patients, 36% had a consistent pattern in all three waves. IRD patients using a bDMARD may consistently experience specific fatigue patterns surrounding bDMARD administration. These patterns provide insights for clinical practice and could be used to inform patients properly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724786/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05779-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05779-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fatigue patterns surrounding biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug injection in patients with an inflammatory rheumatic disease: an ecological momentary assessment study.
This study investigated severity, course and patterns of fatigue surrounding subcutaneous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) injection in inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) patients using ecological momentary assessments and investigated self-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this prospective cohort study, IRD patients completed fatigue severity numeric rating scales (0-10) in web-based ecological momentary assessments in three waves of five days surrounding bDMARD injection. The course of fatigue was measured by the change in fatigue from pre-dosing to post-dosing scores and was classified as: worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change. A pattern was defined as a course of worsening, improving or no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves for patients completing assessments across all three waves. ADRs could be reported on day five of each wave. In total 609 participants completed ecological momentary assessments surrounding 1541 bDMARD injections. Overall average fatigue severity across all three waves was 4.5 (± SD 2.4) and 78% experienced severe fatigue in at least one assessment. Of 398 patients completing all three waves, 61% had no clinically relevant change in fatigue in at least two out of three waves, 13% had a pattern of worsening fatigue and 18% had a pattern of improving fatigue. Of 398 patients, 36% had a consistent pattern in all three waves. IRD patients using a bDMARD may consistently experience specific fatigue patterns surrounding bDMARD administration. These patterns provide insights for clinical practice and could be used to inform patients properly.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.