多粘菌素B和米诺环素联合抗肺炎克雷伯菌的综合转化PKPD建模方法

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Chenyan Zhao , Sanne van den Berg , Zhigang Wang , Anna Olsson , Vincent Aranzana-Climent , Christer Malmberg , Pernilla Lagerbäck , Thomas Tängdén , Anouk E. Muller , Elisabet I. Nielsen , Lena E. Friberg
{"title":"多粘菌素B和米诺环素联合抗肺炎克雷伯菌的综合转化PKPD建模方法","authors":"Chenyan Zhao ,&nbsp;Sanne van den Berg ,&nbsp;Zhigang Wang ,&nbsp;Anna Olsson ,&nbsp;Vincent Aranzana-Climent ,&nbsp;Christer Malmberg ,&nbsp;Pernilla Lagerbäck ,&nbsp;Thomas Tängdén ,&nbsp;Anouk E. Muller ,&nbsp;Elisabet I. Nielsen ,&nbsp;Lena E. Friberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To expand a translational pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling approach for assessing the combined effect of polymyxin B and minocycline against <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A PKPD model developed based on <em>in vitro</em> static time-kill experiments of one strain (ARU613) was first translated to characterize that of a more susceptible strain (ARU705), and thereafter to dynamic time-kill experiments (both strains) and to a murine thigh infection model (ARU705 only). The PKPD model was updated stepwise using accumulated data. Predictions of bacterial killing in humans were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The same model structure could be used in each translational step, with parameters being re-estimated. Dynamic data were well predicted by static-data-based models. The <em>in vitro</em>/<em>in vivo</em> differences were primarily quantified as a change in polymyxin B effect: a lower killing rate constant <em>in vivo</em> compared with <em>in vitro</em> (concentration of 3 mg/L corresponds to 0.05/h and 57/h, respectively), and a slower adaptive resistance rate (the constant <em>in vivo</em> was 2.5% of that <em>in vitro</em>). There was no significant difference in polymyxin B–minocycline interaction functions. Predictions based on both <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> parameters indicated that the combination has a greater-than-monotherapy antibacterial effect in humans, forecasting a reduction of approximately 5 and 2 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming units/mL at 24 h, respectively, under combined therapy, while the maximum bacterial load was reached in monotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated the utility of the PKPD modelling approach to understand translation of antibiotic effects across experimental systems, and showed a promising antibacterial effect of polymyxin B and minocycline in combination against <em>K. pneumoniae</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"65 3","pages":"Article 107443"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrative and translational PKPD modelling approach to explore the combined effect of polymyxin B and minocycline against Klebsiella pneumoniae\",\"authors\":\"Chenyan Zhao ,&nbsp;Sanne van den Berg ,&nbsp;Zhigang Wang ,&nbsp;Anna Olsson ,&nbsp;Vincent Aranzana-Climent ,&nbsp;Christer Malmberg ,&nbsp;Pernilla Lagerbäck ,&nbsp;Thomas Tängdén ,&nbsp;Anouk E. Muller ,&nbsp;Elisabet I. Nielsen ,&nbsp;Lena E. Friberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To expand a translational pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling approach for assessing the combined effect of polymyxin B and minocycline against <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A PKPD model developed based on <em>in vitro</em> static time-kill experiments of one strain (ARU613) was first translated to characterize that of a more susceptible strain (ARU705), and thereafter to dynamic time-kill experiments (both strains) and to a murine thigh infection model (ARU705 only). The PKPD model was updated stepwise using accumulated data. Predictions of bacterial killing in humans were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The same model structure could be used in each translational step, with parameters being re-estimated. Dynamic data were well predicted by static-data-based models. The <em>in vitro</em>/<em>in vivo</em> differences were primarily quantified as a change in polymyxin B effect: a lower killing rate constant <em>in vivo</em> compared with <em>in vitro</em> (concentration of 3 mg/L corresponds to 0.05/h and 57/h, respectively), and a slower adaptive resistance rate (the constant <em>in vivo</em> was 2.5% of that <em>in vitro</em>). There was no significant difference in polymyxin B–minocycline interaction functions. Predictions based on both <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> parameters indicated that the combination has a greater-than-monotherapy antibacterial effect in humans, forecasting a reduction of approximately 5 and 2 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming units/mL at 24 h, respectively, under combined therapy, while the maximum bacterial load was reached in monotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated the utility of the PKPD modelling approach to understand translation of antibiotic effects across experimental systems, and showed a promising antibacterial effect of polymyxin B and minocycline in combination against <em>K. pneumoniae</em>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 107443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857925000019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857925000019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:扩展一种翻译药代动力学-药效学(PKPD)模型方法,以评估多粘菌素B和米诺环素联合治疗肺炎克雷伯菌的效果。方法:首先将基于一株菌株(ARU613)体外静态时效实验建立的PKPD模型转化为易感菌株(ARU705)的PKPD模型,然后将其转化为动态时效实验(两株菌株)和小鼠大腿感染模型(仅ARU705)。利用累积数据逐步更新PKPD模型。结果:每个平移步骤可以使用相同的模型结构,并重新估计参数。基于静态数据的模型可以很好地预测动态数据。体外-体内差异主要量化为多粘菌素B效应的变化:体内杀灭率常数较体外低(浓度为3 mg/L分别为0.05 /h和57 /h),适应耐药率较慢(体内常数为体外的2.5%)。多粘菌素与米诺环素相互作用功能差异无统计学意义。基于体外和体内参数的预测表明,联合治疗在人体中的抗菌效果优于单药治疗,预测联合治疗在24小时内分别减少约5和2 log10 CFU/mL,而单药治疗达到最大细菌负荷。结论:该研究证明了PKPD建模方法在理解抗生素效应在实验系统中的翻译中的效用,并显示了多粘菌素B和米诺环素联合使用对肺炎克雷伯菌的有希望的抗菌效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An integrative and translational PKPD modelling approach to explore the combined effect of polymyxin B and minocycline against Klebsiella pneumoniae

An integrative and translational PKPD modelling approach to explore the combined effect of polymyxin B and minocycline against Klebsiella pneumoniae

Objectives

To expand a translational pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling approach for assessing the combined effect of polymyxin B and minocycline against Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Methods

A PKPD model developed based on in vitro static time-kill experiments of one strain (ARU613) was first translated to characterize that of a more susceptible strain (ARU705), and thereafter to dynamic time-kill experiments (both strains) and to a murine thigh infection model (ARU705 only). The PKPD model was updated stepwise using accumulated data. Predictions of bacterial killing in humans were performed.

Results

The same model structure could be used in each translational step, with parameters being re-estimated. Dynamic data were well predicted by static-data-based models. The in vitro/in vivo differences were primarily quantified as a change in polymyxin B effect: a lower killing rate constant in vivo compared with in vitro (concentration of 3 mg/L corresponds to 0.05/h and 57/h, respectively), and a slower adaptive resistance rate (the constant in vivo was 2.5% of that in vitro). There was no significant difference in polymyxin B–minocycline interaction functions. Predictions based on both in vitro and in vivo parameters indicated that the combination has a greater-than-monotherapy antibacterial effect in humans, forecasting a reduction of approximately 5 and 2 log10 colony-forming units/mL at 24 h, respectively, under combined therapy, while the maximum bacterial load was reached in monotherapy.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the utility of the PKPD modelling approach to understand translation of antibiotic effects across experimental systems, and showed a promising antibacterial effect of polymyxin B and minocycline in combination against K. pneumoniae.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信