隔离性坏死风险分层的象限、坏死和感染标准:使用多机构数据的外部验证。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hideyuki Shiomi, Tomotaka Saito, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Ryota Nakano, Shunsuke Omoto, Mamoru Takenaka, Masahiro Tsujimae, Atsuhiro Masuda, Shogo Ota, Shinya Uemura, Takuji Iwashita, Sho Takahashi, Toshio Fujisawa, Kentaro Suda, Saburo Matsubara, Kensaku Yoshida, Akinori Maruta, Yuhei Iwasa, Keisuke Iwata, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Hiroyuki Isayama, Ichiro Yasuda, Yousuke Nakai
{"title":"隔离性坏死风险分层的象限、坏死和感染标准:使用多机构数据的外部验证。","authors":"Hideyuki Shiomi, Tomotaka Saito, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Ryota Nakano, Shunsuke Omoto, Mamoru Takenaka, Masahiro Tsujimae, Atsuhiro Masuda, Shogo Ota, Shinya Uemura, Takuji Iwashita, Sho Takahashi, Toshio Fujisawa, Kentaro Suda, Saburo Matsubara, Kensaku Yoshida, Akinori Maruta, Yuhei Iwasa, Keisuke Iwata, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Hiroyuki Isayama, Ichiro Yasuda, Yousuke Nakai","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.12.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided peripancreatic fluid drainage (EUS-PFD) with on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy, increasingly utilized to manage walled-off necrosis (WON), is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This multicenter study aimed to externally validate recently developed quadrant (an abdominal quadrant distribution), necrosis, and infection (QNI) criteria for risk stratification in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 423 patients with pancreatic fluid collections treated in a large multi-institutional cohort between 2010 and 2020, 212 with available preprocedural computed tomography images were included. Clinical outcomes between high- and low-risk groups defined according to QNI criteria were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical success rate did not differ significantly between the QNI-high and QNI-low groups (74.4% vs. 83.5%, respectively; P = 0.12). Time to clinical success was longer in the QNI-high group compared with the QNI-low group (median, 68 vs. 46 days, respectively; P = 0.0016). Compared with the QNI-low group, the QNI-high group was associated with higher rates of percutaneous interventions, direct endoscopic necrosectomy, mortality, and adverse events. The QNI-high group was independently associated with time to clinical success (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.87; P =0.005) in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and with the risk of ≥grade III adverse events (odds ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.04-8.20; P = 0.04) in multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QNI criteria effectively stratified time to clinical success and the risk of adverse outcomes for patients receiving EUS-PFD of WON. Further investigations could elucidate appropriate management strategies based on QNI-based risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quadrant, necrosis, and infection criteria for the risk stratification of walled-off necrosis: external validation using multi-institutional data.\",\"authors\":\"Hideyuki Shiomi, Tomotaka Saito, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Ryota Nakano, Shunsuke Omoto, Mamoru Takenaka, Masahiro Tsujimae, Atsuhiro Masuda, Shogo Ota, Shinya Uemura, Takuji Iwashita, Sho Takahashi, Toshio Fujisawa, Kentaro Suda, Saburo Matsubara, Kensaku Yoshida, Akinori Maruta, Yuhei Iwasa, Keisuke Iwata, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Hiroyuki Isayama, Ichiro Yasuda, Yousuke Nakai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.12.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided peripancreatic fluid drainage (EUS-PFD) with on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy, increasingly utilized to manage walled-off necrosis (WON), is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This multicenter study aimed to externally validate recently developed quadrant (an abdominal quadrant distribution), necrosis, and infection (QNI) criteria for risk stratification in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 423 patients with pancreatic fluid collections treated in a large multi-institutional cohort between 2010 and 2020, 212 with available preprocedural computed tomography images were included. Clinical outcomes between high- and low-risk groups defined according to QNI criteria were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical success rate did not differ significantly between the QNI-high and QNI-low groups (74.4% vs. 83.5%, respectively; P = 0.12). Time to clinical success was longer in the QNI-high group compared with the QNI-low group (median, 68 vs. 46 days, respectively; P = 0.0016). Compared with the QNI-low group, the QNI-high group was associated with higher rates of percutaneous interventions, direct endoscopic necrosectomy, mortality, and adverse events. The QNI-high group was independently associated with time to clinical success (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.87; P =0.005) in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and with the risk of ≥grade III adverse events (odds ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.04-8.20; P = 0.04) in multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QNI criteria effectively stratified time to clinical success and the risk of adverse outcomes for patients receiving EUS-PFD of WON. Further investigations could elucidate appropriate management strategies based on QNI-based risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.12.037\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.12.037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:内镜下超声引导下胰周液引流(EUS-PFD)与按需内镜下坏死切除术,越来越多地用于治疗壁闭塞性坏死(WON),与大量发病率和死亡率相关。这项多中心研究旨在从外部验证最近开发的象限(腹部象限分布)、坏死和感染(QNI)标准在这种情况下的风险分层。方法:2010年至2020年间,在一个大型多机构队列中,423例胰液收集患者接受了治疗,其中212例术前计算机断层扫描图像可用。比较根据QNI标准定义的高危组和低危组的临床结果。结果:qni高组与qni低组的临床成功率无显著差异(74.4% vs 83.5%;P = 0.12)。与qni低组相比,qni高组临床成功所需时间更长(中位数分别为68天和46天;P = 0.0016)。与qni低组相比,qni高组与更高的经皮介入率、直接内窥镜下坏死切除术、死亡率和不良事件相关。qni高组与临床成功时间独立相关(风险比0.64,95%可信区间0.46-0.87;P =0.005),且发生≥III级不良事件的风险(优势比2.93,95%可信区间1.04 ~ 8.20;P = 0.04)。结论:QNI标准有效地对接受EUS-PFD的WON患者的临床成功时间和不良结局风险进行了分层。进一步的调查可以阐明基于qni的风险分层的适当管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quadrant, necrosis, and infection criteria for the risk stratification of walled-off necrosis: external validation using multi-institutional data.

Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided peripancreatic fluid drainage (EUS-PFD) with on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy, increasingly utilized to manage walled-off necrosis (WON), is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This multicenter study aimed to externally validate recently developed quadrant (an abdominal quadrant distribution), necrosis, and infection (QNI) criteria for risk stratification in this setting.

Methods: Of 423 patients with pancreatic fluid collections treated in a large multi-institutional cohort between 2010 and 2020, 212 with available preprocedural computed tomography images were included. Clinical outcomes between high- and low-risk groups defined according to QNI criteria were compared.

Results: The clinical success rate did not differ significantly between the QNI-high and QNI-low groups (74.4% vs. 83.5%, respectively; P = 0.12). Time to clinical success was longer in the QNI-high group compared with the QNI-low group (median, 68 vs. 46 days, respectively; P = 0.0016). Compared with the QNI-low group, the QNI-high group was associated with higher rates of percutaneous interventions, direct endoscopic necrosectomy, mortality, and adverse events. The QNI-high group was independently associated with time to clinical success (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.87; P =0.005) in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and with the risk of ≥grade III adverse events (odds ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.04-8.20; P = 0.04) in multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions: The QNI criteria effectively stratified time to clinical success and the risk of adverse outcomes for patients receiving EUS-PFD of WON. Further investigations could elucidate appropriate management strategies based on QNI-based risk stratification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信