一种精确、稳健的多组分定量分析方法:摩尔质量系数法。

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Chromatography A Pub Date : 2025-02-08 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465644
Xi Chen, Siqi Ji, Pengyue Li, Liwei Zhang, Yihuan Wu, Rob Verpoorte, Yuntao Dai
{"title":"一种精确、稳健的多组分定量分析方法:摩尔质量系数法。","authors":"Xi Chen, Siqi Ji, Pengyue Li, Liwei Zhang, Yihuan Wu, Rob Verpoorte, Yuntao Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multicomponent quantitative analysis (MCQA) is necessary for comprehensively characterizing the quality of complex samples, including medicines, foods. However, the limited supply of reference substances and the high costs associated with testing hinder the application of the MCQA using the external standard (ES) method. Here we propose a Molar Mass Coefficient (MMC) method for the quantification of multiple compounds with identical chromophore utilizing a single reference compound (SRC) by a UV detector. This method involves establishment of a linear equation of SRC (y<sub>r</sub>=ax<sub>r</sub>+b) with a standard compound r, followed by the derivation of quantitative equations for other components i using the deduced formula (y<sub>i</sub>=(M<sub>r</sub>/M<sub>i</sub>)ax<sub>i</sub>+b). The MMC method introduces only two known physical parameters, specifically the molar mass of compounds r and i, which ensures both the accuracy and practicality of this method. The feasibility of the MMC method was demonstrated with a set of simulated samples containing 17 flavonoids standard compounds, and further validated with samples of Scutellariae Radix and Ginkgo dry extract. The newly established method could accurately quantify flavonoids, yielding results and robustness consistent with the traditional ES method. Notably, for the contents of baicalin and kaempferol, when compared to the results obtained by ES method, the relative standard deviations (RSD%) for the commonly used method were 5.72 % and 4.96 %, respectively, while these values fall down to 0.73 % and 1.02 % when employing the MMC method. The MMC method exhibited significant advantages over existing methods, including high accuracy, robustness and low cost, implying its broad application in different fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1742 ","pages":"465644"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An accurate and robust multicomponent quantitative analysis method: Molar mass coefficient method.\",\"authors\":\"Xi Chen, Siqi Ji, Pengyue Li, Liwei Zhang, Yihuan Wu, Rob Verpoorte, Yuntao Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multicomponent quantitative analysis (MCQA) is necessary for comprehensively characterizing the quality of complex samples, including medicines, foods. However, the limited supply of reference substances and the high costs associated with testing hinder the application of the MCQA using the external standard (ES) method. Here we propose a Molar Mass Coefficient (MMC) method for the quantification of multiple compounds with identical chromophore utilizing a single reference compound (SRC) by a UV detector. This method involves establishment of a linear equation of SRC (y<sub>r</sub>=ax<sub>r</sub>+b) with a standard compound r, followed by the derivation of quantitative equations for other components i using the deduced formula (y<sub>i</sub>=(M<sub>r</sub>/M<sub>i</sub>)ax<sub>i</sub>+b). The MMC method introduces only two known physical parameters, specifically the molar mass of compounds r and i, which ensures both the accuracy and practicality of this method. The feasibility of the MMC method was demonstrated with a set of simulated samples containing 17 flavonoids standard compounds, and further validated with samples of Scutellariae Radix and Ginkgo dry extract. The newly established method could accurately quantify flavonoids, yielding results and robustness consistent with the traditional ES method. Notably, for the contents of baicalin and kaempferol, when compared to the results obtained by ES method, the relative standard deviations (RSD%) for the commonly used method were 5.72 % and 4.96 %, respectively, while these values fall down to 0.73 % and 1.02 % when employing the MMC method. The MMC method exhibited significant advantages over existing methods, including high accuracy, robustness and low cost, implying its broad application in different fields.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"volume\":\"1742 \",\"pages\":\"465644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465644\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多组分定量分析(MCQA)是综合表征药品、食品等复杂样品质量的必要手段。然而,有限的标准物质供应和与检测相关的高成本阻碍了MCQA使用外部标准(ES)方法的应用。本文提出了一种利用单一参比化合物(SRC)通过紫外检测器定量具有相同生色团的多种化合物的摩尔质量系数(MMC)方法。该方法首先用标准化合物r建立SRC的线性方程(yr=axr+b),然后用推导出的公式(yi=(Mr/Mi)axi+b)推导出其他分量i的定量方程。MMC方法只引入了两个已知的物理参数,即化合物的摩尔质量r和i,保证了该方法的准确性和实用性。以含17种黄酮类化合物的模拟样品验证了MMC方法的可行性,并以黄芩和银杏干提取物样品进一步验证了MMC方法的可行性。该方法能准确定量黄酮类化合物,结果与传统的ES方法一致,稳健性好。值得注意的是,黄芩苷和山奈酚的相对标准偏差(RSD%)与ES法测定结果相比分别为5.72%和4.96%,而MMC法测定结果的相对标准偏差分别为0.73%和1.02%。与现有方法相比,MMC方法具有精度高、鲁棒性好、成本低等显著优势,在不同领域具有广泛的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An accurate and robust multicomponent quantitative analysis method: Molar mass coefficient method.

Multicomponent quantitative analysis (MCQA) is necessary for comprehensively characterizing the quality of complex samples, including medicines, foods. However, the limited supply of reference substances and the high costs associated with testing hinder the application of the MCQA using the external standard (ES) method. Here we propose a Molar Mass Coefficient (MMC) method for the quantification of multiple compounds with identical chromophore utilizing a single reference compound (SRC) by a UV detector. This method involves establishment of a linear equation of SRC (yr=axr+b) with a standard compound r, followed by the derivation of quantitative equations for other components i using the deduced formula (yi=(Mr/Mi)axi+b). The MMC method introduces only two known physical parameters, specifically the molar mass of compounds r and i, which ensures both the accuracy and practicality of this method. The feasibility of the MMC method was demonstrated with a set of simulated samples containing 17 flavonoids standard compounds, and further validated with samples of Scutellariae Radix and Ginkgo dry extract. The newly established method could accurately quantify flavonoids, yielding results and robustness consistent with the traditional ES method. Notably, for the contents of baicalin and kaempferol, when compared to the results obtained by ES method, the relative standard deviations (RSD%) for the commonly used method were 5.72 % and 4.96 %, respectively, while these values fall down to 0.73 % and 1.02 % when employing the MMC method. The MMC method exhibited significant advantages over existing methods, including high accuracy, robustness and low cost, implying its broad application in different fields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信