使用以患者为中心的结果措施与个人轮椅预算过程在NHS英格兰:一个混合的方法来探索使用手表和手表广告的员工和服务用户体验。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312967
Lorna Tuersley, Naa Amua Quaye, Kalpa Pisavadia, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Nathan Bray
{"title":"使用以患者为中心的结果措施与个人轮椅预算过程在NHS英格兰:一个混合的方法来探索使用手表和手表广告的员工和服务用户体验。","authors":"Lorna Tuersley, Naa Amua Quaye, Kalpa Pisavadia, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Nathan Bray","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0312967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Personal wheelchair budgets (PWBs) are offered to everyone in England eligible for a wheelchair provided through the National Health Service (NHS) to support their choice of equipment. The WATCh (Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children) and related WATCh-Ad for adults are patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) developed to help individual users express their main outcome needs when obtaining a wheelchair and rate their satisfaction with subsequent outcomes after receiving their equipment. Use was explored in a real-world setting, aiming to produce guidance for use alongside the PWB process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three wheelchair service provider organisations across four sites participated. Staff and users completed surveys about their experience of assessments using the WATCh and/or WATCh-Ad. Selected patients were interviewed after receipt of their equipment, and staff were interviewed after experiencing a number of assessments. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the tool, survey and interview data. Results of pre- and post-equipment provision were presented graphically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information on 75 assessments by 15 staff was obtained. Three-quarters of users or their carers rated the use of the tools in the assessment process as 'helpful' or 'very helpful'. Staff reported that the WATCh or WATCh-Ad had been considered 'useful' in developing individual care plans in around 1 in 3 cases and affected the prescription in 1 in 4 cases. Concerns were expressed about the length of time taken to administer the tools in clinic. However, some staff noted this reduced with more hands-on experience and by providing the tools to users in advance of the appointment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WATCh and WATCh-Ad PCOMs are suitable for routine use by wheelchair service providers to assist the assessment process. It is recommended that tool materials are provided in advance to users/carers and that staff are allowed time to develop their ways of working with them.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 1","pages":"e0312967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of patient-centred outcome measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: A mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad.\",\"authors\":\"Lorna Tuersley, Naa Amua Quaye, Kalpa Pisavadia, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Nathan Bray\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0312967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Personal wheelchair budgets (PWBs) are offered to everyone in England eligible for a wheelchair provided through the National Health Service (NHS) to support their choice of equipment. The WATCh (Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children) and related WATCh-Ad for adults are patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) developed to help individual users express their main outcome needs when obtaining a wheelchair and rate their satisfaction with subsequent outcomes after receiving their equipment. Use was explored in a real-world setting, aiming to produce guidance for use alongside the PWB process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three wheelchair service provider organisations across four sites participated. Staff and users completed surveys about their experience of assessments using the WATCh and/or WATCh-Ad. Selected patients were interviewed after receipt of their equipment, and staff were interviewed after experiencing a number of assessments. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the tool, survey and interview data. Results of pre- and post-equipment provision were presented graphically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information on 75 assessments by 15 staff was obtained. Three-quarters of users or their carers rated the use of the tools in the assessment process as 'helpful' or 'very helpful'. Staff reported that the WATCh or WATCh-Ad had been considered 'useful' in developing individual care plans in around 1 in 3 cases and affected the prescription in 1 in 4 cases. Concerns were expressed about the length of time taken to administer the tools in clinic. However, some staff noted this reduced with more hands-on experience and by providing the tools to users in advance of the appointment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WATCh and WATCh-Ad PCOMs are suitable for routine use by wheelchair service providers to assist the assessment process. It is recommended that tool materials are provided in advance to users/carers and that staff are allowed time to develop their ways of working with them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"e0312967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312967\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:个人轮椅预算(PWBs)提供给每个在英格兰有资格获得轮椅的人,通过国家卫生服务(NHS)提供,以支持他们选择设备。WATCh(儿童轮椅结果评估工具)和相关的成人WATCh- ad是以患者为中心的结果测量(PCOMs),旨在帮助个人用户在获得轮椅时表达他们的主要结果需求,并在获得设备后评估他们对后续结果的满意度。在现实环境中探索使用,旨在为PWB过程提供使用指南。方法:参与了四个站点的三个轮椅服务提供者组织。工作人员和用户完成了关于他们使用WATCh和/或WATCh- ad的评估体验的调查。选定的患者在收到设备后接受采访,工作人员在经历了一系列评估后接受采访。利用该工具、调查和访谈数据进行了专题分析。设备提供前后的结果用图表表示。结果:获得了15名工作人员进行的75次评估的资料。四分之三的用户或他们的护理人员将这些工具在评估过程中的使用评为“有用”或“非常有用”。工作人员报告说,大约三分之一的人认为WATCh或WATCh- ad在制定个人护理计划方面“有用”,四分之一的人认为WATCh或WATCh- ad影响了处方。人们对临床使用这些工具所需的时间表示担忧。但是,一些工作人员指出,有了更多的实践经验和在预约前向用户提供工具,这种情况就减少了。结论:WATCh和WATCh- ad PCOMs适合轮椅服务提供者日常使用,以协助评估过程。建议提前向使用者/护理人员提供工具材料,并允许工作人员有时间发展他们的工作方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of patient-centred outcome measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: A mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad.

Background and objective: Personal wheelchair budgets (PWBs) are offered to everyone in England eligible for a wheelchair provided through the National Health Service (NHS) to support their choice of equipment. The WATCh (Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children) and related WATCh-Ad for adults are patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) developed to help individual users express their main outcome needs when obtaining a wheelchair and rate their satisfaction with subsequent outcomes after receiving their equipment. Use was explored in a real-world setting, aiming to produce guidance for use alongside the PWB process.

Methods: Three wheelchair service provider organisations across four sites participated. Staff and users completed surveys about their experience of assessments using the WATCh and/or WATCh-Ad. Selected patients were interviewed after receipt of their equipment, and staff were interviewed after experiencing a number of assessments. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the tool, survey and interview data. Results of pre- and post-equipment provision were presented graphically.

Results: Information on 75 assessments by 15 staff was obtained. Three-quarters of users or their carers rated the use of the tools in the assessment process as 'helpful' or 'very helpful'. Staff reported that the WATCh or WATCh-Ad had been considered 'useful' in developing individual care plans in around 1 in 3 cases and affected the prescription in 1 in 4 cases. Concerns were expressed about the length of time taken to administer the tools in clinic. However, some staff noted this reduced with more hands-on experience and by providing the tools to users in advance of the appointment.

Conclusions: The WATCh and WATCh-Ad PCOMs are suitable for routine use by wheelchair service providers to assist the assessment process. It is recommended that tool materials are provided in advance to users/carers and that staff are allowed time to develop their ways of working with them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信