基于3D打印定制导尿管的微创人工耳蜗植入装置的临床前研究。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emmanuel Micault, Adrien Chenneviere, Sylvain Moreau, Martin Hitier
{"title":"基于3D打印定制导尿管的微创人工耳蜗植入装置的临床前研究。","authors":"Emmanuel Micault, Adrien Chenneviere, Sylvain Moreau, Martin Hitier","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of a custom 3D-printed guide for performing a minimally invasive cochleostomy for cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective performance study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Secondary care. Department of Otolaryngology, Caen University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Four unselected patients (eight temporal bones), donated to science.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Therapeutic procedure with minimally invasive cochleostomy using a custom drill guide.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Comparing the difference in trajectory between the cochleostomy axis achieved with the guide and the ideal axis planned preoperatively. A mean accuracy of less than 0.5 mm at the cochlear target was considered satisfactory.The distance between the drilled axis and certain anatomical structures (facial nerve, external auditory meatus, stapes, and chorda tympani) was also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average distance between the target and the planned target was 0.51 ± 0.21 mm. No critical structures were damaged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this feasibility study demonstrated that the precision of this guide was close to the target of less than 0.5 mm, with reassuring safety data regarding critical anatomical structures. It therefore seems worthwhile to pursue the development of the procedure with a larger-scale study, using more precise, high-performance software and cochlear implantation equipment and assessing the quality of electrode insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"46 2","pages":"148-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preclinical Study of a Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Device Based on 3D Printing of a Custom Guide.\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Micault, Adrien Chenneviere, Sylvain Moreau, Martin Hitier\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of a custom 3D-printed guide for performing a minimally invasive cochleostomy for cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective performance study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Secondary care. Department of Otolaryngology, Caen University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Four unselected patients (eight temporal bones), donated to science.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Therapeutic procedure with minimally invasive cochleostomy using a custom drill guide.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Comparing the difference in trajectory between the cochleostomy axis achieved with the guide and the ideal axis planned preoperatively. A mean accuracy of less than 0.5 mm at the cochlear target was considered satisfactory.The distance between the drilled axis and certain anatomical structures (facial nerve, external auditory meatus, stapes, and chorda tympani) was also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average distance between the target and the planned target was 0.51 ± 0.21 mm. No critical structures were damaged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this feasibility study demonstrated that the precision of this guide was close to the target of less than 0.5 mm, with reassuring safety data regarding critical anatomical structures. It therefore seems worthwhile to pursue the development of the procedure with a larger-scale study, using more precise, high-performance software and cochlear implantation equipment and assessing the quality of electrode insertion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"148-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004388\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是测试一种定制的3d打印导尿管在微创人工耳蜗造口术中的可行性。研究设计:前瞻性绩效研究。环境:二级护理。卡昂大学附属医院耳鼻咽喉科。患者:4名未入选患者(8块颞骨),捐赠给科学研究。干预:微创耳蜗造口术治疗程序,使用定制的钻导器。主要观察指标:比较导尿管下耳蜗造口轴线与术前规划理想轴线的轨迹差异。在耳蜗靶处平均精度小于0.5 mm被认为是满意的。还测量了钻孔轴与某些解剖结构(面神经、外耳道、镫骨和鼓室索)之间的距离。结果:靶体与计划靶体的平均距离为0.51±0.21 mm。没有关键结构受损。结论:本可行性研究结果表明,该导轨的精度接近0.5 mm以内的目标,对于关键解剖结构具有可靠的安全数据。因此,采用更精确、高性能的软件和人工耳蜗植入设备,并评估电极插入的质量,进行更大规模的研究似乎是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preclinical Study of a Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Device Based on 3D Printing of a Custom Guide.

Objective: The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of a custom 3D-printed guide for performing a minimally invasive cochleostomy for cochlear implantation.

Study design: Prospective performance study.

Setting: Secondary care. Department of Otolaryngology, Caen University Hospital.

Patients: Four unselected patients (eight temporal bones), donated to science.

Intervention: Therapeutic procedure with minimally invasive cochleostomy using a custom drill guide.

Main outcome measure: Comparing the difference in trajectory between the cochleostomy axis achieved with the guide and the ideal axis planned preoperatively. A mean accuracy of less than 0.5 mm at the cochlear target was considered satisfactory.The distance between the drilled axis and certain anatomical structures (facial nerve, external auditory meatus, stapes, and chorda tympani) was also measured.

Results: The average distance between the target and the planned target was 0.51 ± 0.21 mm. No critical structures were damaged.

Conclusion: The results of this feasibility study demonstrated that the precision of this guide was close to the target of less than 0.5 mm, with reassuring safety data regarding critical anatomical structures. It therefore seems worthwhile to pursue the development of the procedure with a larger-scale study, using more precise, high-performance software and cochlear implantation equipment and assessing the quality of electrode insertion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信