评估图片辅助24小时召回测量手卫生和儿童粪便处理的信度和效度:马拉维的一项横断面研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Olivier Rizk , Sarah Bick , Blessings White , Kondwani Chidziwisano , Robert Dreibelbis
{"title":"评估图片辅助24小时召回测量手卫生和儿童粪便处理的信度和效度:马拉维的一项横断面研究。","authors":"Olivier Rizk ,&nbsp;Sarah Bick ,&nbsp;Blessings White ,&nbsp;Kondwani Chidziwisano ,&nbsp;Robert Dreibelbis","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Whilst improving hygiene and sanitation behaviours is key to cost-effective and sustainable water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, measuring behaviour change remains a challenge. This study assessed the validity and reliability of pictorial 24-h recall (P24 hR), a novel method using unprompted recall of past activities through pictures, compared to structured observation for measuring handwashing with soap (HWWS) and safe child faeces disposal in rural Malawi. Data were collected from 88 individuals across 74 households in Chiradzulu district using both methods over a two-day period, with the recall period of the P24 hR corresponding to the period of structured observation completed the previous day. Results showed poor agreement between P24 hR and observations in detection of hygiene opportunities and behaviours. P24 hR under-reported handwashing opportunities when frequency was high and over-reported them when frequency was low. The 95% limits of agreement for handwashing opportunities estimated through Bland-Altman analysis (−7.62 to 4.89) were unacceptably wide given median 5 opportunities observed per participant. P24 hR also over-reported HWWS and safe child faeces disposal, and kappa statistics indicated agreement no better than by chance. Structured observation remains the better method for measuring hygiene behaviours as compared to the P24 hR method despite its known limitations, including potential reactivity bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13994,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 114516"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the reliability and validity of pictorial-assisted 24-h recall for measuring hand hygiene and child faeces disposal: A cross-sectional study in Malawi\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Rizk ,&nbsp;Sarah Bick ,&nbsp;Blessings White ,&nbsp;Kondwani Chidziwisano ,&nbsp;Robert Dreibelbis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Whilst improving hygiene and sanitation behaviours is key to cost-effective and sustainable water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, measuring behaviour change remains a challenge. This study assessed the validity and reliability of pictorial 24-h recall (P24 hR), a novel method using unprompted recall of past activities through pictures, compared to structured observation for measuring handwashing with soap (HWWS) and safe child faeces disposal in rural Malawi. Data were collected from 88 individuals across 74 households in Chiradzulu district using both methods over a two-day period, with the recall period of the P24 hR corresponding to the period of structured observation completed the previous day. Results showed poor agreement between P24 hR and observations in detection of hygiene opportunities and behaviours. P24 hR under-reported handwashing opportunities when frequency was high and over-reported them when frequency was low. The 95% limits of agreement for handwashing opportunities estimated through Bland-Altman analysis (−7.62 to 4.89) were unacceptably wide given median 5 opportunities observed per participant. P24 hR also over-reported HWWS and safe child faeces disposal, and kappa statistics indicated agreement no better than by chance. Structured observation remains the better method for measuring hygiene behaviours as compared to the P24 hR method despite its known limitations, including potential reactivity bias.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of hygiene and environmental health\",\"volume\":\"264 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of hygiene and environmental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463924001974\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463924001974","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然改善个人卫生和环境卫生行为是具有成本效益和可持续的水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施的关键,但衡量行为变化仍然是一项挑战。本研究评估了图片24小时回忆(P24 hR)的效度和可靠性,这是一种通过图片自动回忆过去活动的新方法,与马拉维农村用肥皂洗手(HWWS)和安全儿童粪便处理的结构化观察相比较。在为期两天的时间内,使用这两种方法从Chiradzulu地区74个家庭的88个人中收集数据,P24小时的回忆期对应于前一天完成的结构化观察期。结果显示,在卫生机会和行为的检测中,P24 hR与观察结果的一致性较差。当频率高时,少报洗手机会,而当频率低时,多报洗手机会。通过Bland-Altman分析估计的洗手机会95%的一致性限制(-7.62至4.89)是不可接受的,因为每个参与者观察到的平均5个机会。P24 hR也过度报告了HWWS和安全儿童粪便处理,kappa统计表明一致性并不比偶然更好。与P24 hR法相比,结构化观察仍然是测量卫生行为的更好方法,尽管其已知的局限性,包括潜在的反应性偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the reliability and validity of pictorial-assisted 24-h recall for measuring hand hygiene and child faeces disposal: A cross-sectional study in Malawi
Whilst improving hygiene and sanitation behaviours is key to cost-effective and sustainable water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, measuring behaviour change remains a challenge. This study assessed the validity and reliability of pictorial 24-h recall (P24 hR), a novel method using unprompted recall of past activities through pictures, compared to structured observation for measuring handwashing with soap (HWWS) and safe child faeces disposal in rural Malawi. Data were collected from 88 individuals across 74 households in Chiradzulu district using both methods over a two-day period, with the recall period of the P24 hR corresponding to the period of structured observation completed the previous day. Results showed poor agreement between P24 hR and observations in detection of hygiene opportunities and behaviours. P24 hR under-reported handwashing opportunities when frequency was high and over-reported them when frequency was low. The 95% limits of agreement for handwashing opportunities estimated through Bland-Altman analysis (−7.62 to 4.89) were unacceptably wide given median 5 opportunities observed per participant. P24 hR also over-reported HWWS and safe child faeces disposal, and kappa statistics indicated agreement no better than by chance. Structured observation remains the better method for measuring hygiene behaviours as compared to the P24 hR method despite its known limitations, including potential reactivity bias.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health serves as a multidisciplinary forum for original reports on exposure assessment and the reactions to and consequences of human exposure to the biological, chemical, and physical environment. Research reports, short communications, reviews, scientific comments, technical notes, and editorials will be peer-reviewed before acceptance for publication. Priority will be given to articles on epidemiological aspects of environmental toxicology, health risk assessments, susceptible (sub) populations, sanitation and clean water, human biomonitoring, environmental medicine, and public health aspects of exposure-related outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信