Ning Wang, Jinkun Li, Yunxiao Guo, Panbing Zhang, Fulin You, Ziyi Wang, Zhonghuan Wang, Xiaobin Hong
{"title":"轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病患者的非药物干预的神经机制:一项ALE荟萃分析。","authors":"Ning Wang, Jinkun Li, Yunxiao Guo, Panbing Zhang, Fulin You, Ziyi Wang, Zhonghuan Wang, Xiaobin Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-pharmacologic interventions are effective for persons showing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We used activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to systematically quantify the results of 19 neuroimaging studies in order to identify brain regions in which patients showed stable increases or decreases in activation after interventions. We also tested the moderating effects of disease stage (MCI vs. AD) and intervention modality (cognitive training vs. exercise intervention). The results showed increased activation in the cuneus, precuneus and medial frontal gyrus in the combined groups after treatment, whereas the anterior cingulate gyrus showed decreased activation. Secondly, in the MCI group there was increased activation in the precuneus and precentral gyrus after treatment, whereas there was decreased activation in the anterior cingulate gyrus; in the AD group there was only increased activation after treatment, including in the lingual gyrus and bilateral superior temporal gyrus. Finally, the bilateral cuneus and precentral gyrus showed increased activation after cognitive training, while bilateral insula, among others, showed decreased activation. This suggests that there are brain activation changes after non-pharmacological treatments for MCI and AD patients, but that the treatment mechanisms are moderated by stage and intervention modality. Future studies could continue to explore specific neural mechanisms involved in different intervention conditions for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"112678"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural mechanisms of non-pharmacological interventions in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: An ALE meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ning Wang, Jinkun Li, Yunxiao Guo, Panbing Zhang, Fulin You, Ziyi Wang, Zhonghuan Wang, Xiaobin Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Non-pharmacologic interventions are effective for persons showing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We used activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to systematically quantify the results of 19 neuroimaging studies in order to identify brain regions in which patients showed stable increases or decreases in activation after interventions. We also tested the moderating effects of disease stage (MCI vs. AD) and intervention modality (cognitive training vs. exercise intervention). The results showed increased activation in the cuneus, precuneus and medial frontal gyrus in the combined groups after treatment, whereas the anterior cingulate gyrus showed decreased activation. Secondly, in the MCI group there was increased activation in the precuneus and precentral gyrus after treatment, whereas there was decreased activation in the anterior cingulate gyrus; in the AD group there was only increased activation after treatment, including in the lingual gyrus and bilateral superior temporal gyrus. Finally, the bilateral cuneus and precentral gyrus showed increased activation after cognitive training, while bilateral insula, among others, showed decreased activation. This suggests that there are brain activation changes after non-pharmacological treatments for MCI and AD patients, but that the treatment mechanisms are moderated by stage and intervention modality. Future studies could continue to explore specific neural mechanisms involved in different intervention conditions for these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"112678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2025.112678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2025.112678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非药物干预对轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)有效。我们使用激活似然估计(ALE)荟萃分析系统地量化了19项神经影像学研究的结果,以确定患者在干预后表现出稳定的激活增加或减少的大脑区域。我们还测试了疾病分期(MCI vs AD)和干预方式(认知训练vs运动干预)的调节作用。结果显示,联合治疗组治疗后楔叶、楔前叶和额内侧回的激活增加,而前扣带回的激活减少。其次,MCI组治疗后楔前叶和中央前回的激活增加,而扣带前回的激活减少;在AD组中,治疗后只有舌回和双侧颞上回的激活增加。最后,在认知训练后,双侧楔叶和中央前回的激活增加,而双侧脑岛等的激活减少。这表明MCI和AD患者在非药物治疗后存在脑激活变化,但治疗机制受分期和干预方式的调节。未来的研究可以继续探索不同干预条件下这些患者的特定神经机制。
Neural mechanisms of non-pharmacological interventions in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: An ALE meta-analysis.
Non-pharmacologic interventions are effective for persons showing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We used activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to systematically quantify the results of 19 neuroimaging studies in order to identify brain regions in which patients showed stable increases or decreases in activation after interventions. We also tested the moderating effects of disease stage (MCI vs. AD) and intervention modality (cognitive training vs. exercise intervention). The results showed increased activation in the cuneus, precuneus and medial frontal gyrus in the combined groups after treatment, whereas the anterior cingulate gyrus showed decreased activation. Secondly, in the MCI group there was increased activation in the precuneus and precentral gyrus after treatment, whereas there was decreased activation in the anterior cingulate gyrus; in the AD group there was only increased activation after treatment, including in the lingual gyrus and bilateral superior temporal gyrus. Finally, the bilateral cuneus and precentral gyrus showed increased activation after cognitive training, while bilateral insula, among others, showed decreased activation. This suggests that there are brain activation changes after non-pharmacological treatments for MCI and AD patients, but that the treatment mechanisms are moderated by stage and intervention modality. Future studies could continue to explore specific neural mechanisms involved in different intervention conditions for these patients.