国际接触性皮炎研究组代表国际接触性皮炎研究组澄清和修改斑贴试验反应分类。

IF 3.2
Magnus Bruze, Cecilia Svedman
{"title":"国际接触性皮炎研究组代表国际接触性皮炎研究组澄清和修改斑贴试验反应分类。","authors":"Magnus Bruze, Cecilia Svedman","doi":"10.1089/derm.2024.0365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><u><i><b></b></i></u> The first ICDRG (International Contact Dermatitis Research Group) classification of patch test reactions was published in 1970. With this classification, many weak reactions were classified as allergic reactions. A second classification was therefore implemented one decade later on behalf of the ICDRG and the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. This classification was adopted by the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Evaluation of the significance of the results of various studies on patch test reading demonstrated that a new ICDRG classification of patch test reactions was needed. A classification system should not be based on the exclusive presence/absence of papules and vesicles, i.e., the words \"possibly papules/vesicles\" allow for the unavoidable variation in reading among experts. Dermatologists are not reading patch test reactions in a uniform way due to lack of a clear definition of the threshold between weak allergic and doubtful reactions. A new ICDRG classification with clarifications and modifications of the old one is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":93974,"journal":{"name":"Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug","volume":" ","pages":"440-446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clarification and Modification of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group Classification of Patch Test Reactions on Behalf of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Bruze, Cecilia Svedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/derm.2024.0365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><u><i><b></b></i></u> The first ICDRG (International Contact Dermatitis Research Group) classification of patch test reactions was published in 1970. With this classification, many weak reactions were classified as allergic reactions. A second classification was therefore implemented one decade later on behalf of the ICDRG and the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. This classification was adopted by the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Evaluation of the significance of the results of various studies on patch test reading demonstrated that a new ICDRG classification of patch test reactions was needed. A classification system should not be based on the exclusive presence/absence of papules and vesicles, i.e., the words \\\"possibly papules/vesicles\\\" allow for the unavoidable variation in reading among experts. Dermatologists are not reading patch test reactions in a uniform way due to lack of a clear definition of the threshold between weak allergic and doubtful reactions. A new ICDRG classification with clarifications and modifications of the old one is presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"440-446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2024.0365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2024.0365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际接触性皮炎研究小组(ICDRG)于1970年发布了第一个斑贴试验反应分类。根据这种分类,许多弱反应被归类为过敏反应。因此,十年后,代表ICDRG和北美接触性皮炎组实施了第二次分类。这种分类被欧洲接触性皮炎学会采用。对各种关于斑贴试验读数的研究结果的重要性的评估表明,需要对斑贴试验反应进行新的ICDRG分类。分类系统不应该基于丘疹和囊泡的存在与否,也就是说,“可能丘疹/囊泡”的词允许专家之间的阅读不可避免的差异。由于缺乏对弱过敏反应和可疑反应之间阈值的明确定义,皮肤科医生并没有以统一的方式解读斑贴试验反应。提出了一种新的ICDRG分类,对旧分类进行了澄清和修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clarification and Modification of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group Classification of Patch Test Reactions on Behalf of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.

The first ICDRG (International Contact Dermatitis Research Group) classification of patch test reactions was published in 1970. With this classification, many weak reactions were classified as allergic reactions. A second classification was therefore implemented one decade later on behalf of the ICDRG and the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. This classification was adopted by the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Evaluation of the significance of the results of various studies on patch test reading demonstrated that a new ICDRG classification of patch test reactions was needed. A classification system should not be based on the exclusive presence/absence of papules and vesicles, i.e., the words "possibly papules/vesicles" allow for the unavoidable variation in reading among experts. Dermatologists are not reading patch test reactions in a uniform way due to lack of a clear definition of the threshold between weak allergic and doubtful reactions. A new ICDRG classification with clarifications and modifications of the old one is presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信