{"title":"微创体外循环对经右侧小开胸置管微创主动脉瓣置换术的益处:倾向匹配分析。","authors":"Yoshitsugu Nakamura, Taisuke Nakayama, Kusumi Niitsuma, Yuka Higuma, Masaki Ushijima, Miho Kuroda, Yuto Yasumoto, Yujiro Ito, Yujiro Hayashi, Ryo Tsuruta, Naoya Yamauchi, Akihiro Higashino, Fumiaki Shikata","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on blood transfusion and asymptomatic brain injury in comparison to conventional extracorporeal circulation in the context of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy surgery were divided into two groups: the minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation group and the conventional extracorporeal circulation group. Propensity matching was employed for further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 242 patients, the minimally invasive group and conventional group comprised 166 patients and 76 patients, respectively. In the matched cohort of 71 pairs, the two groups had similar preoperative characteristics. Extracorporeal circulation time was similar between the minimally invasive and conventional groups: 113 and 115 min, respectively, as was aortic clamp time: 86 and 82 min, respectively. Estimated amount of haemodilution was lower in the minimally invasive group (16.8 vs. 18.8%, P = 0.006). Blood transfusion frequency during surgery was less than half of conventional in the minimally invasive group (12.7 vs. 31.0%, P = 0.01). There were no deaths or stroke in either group during the hospital stay. Asymptomatic brain injury rate was the same for the two groups (35.2 vs. 35.2%, P = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation was associated with fewer patients requiring transfusion than conventional extracorporeal circulation without an increase of asymptomatic brain injury in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefit of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy using femoral cannulation: a propensity-matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshitsugu Nakamura, Taisuke Nakayama, Kusumi Niitsuma, Yuka Higuma, Masaki Ushijima, Miho Kuroda, Yuto Yasumoto, Yujiro Ito, Yujiro Hayashi, Ryo Tsuruta, Naoya Yamauchi, Akihiro Higashino, Fumiaki Shikata\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivae224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on blood transfusion and asymptomatic brain injury in comparison to conventional extracorporeal circulation in the context of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy surgery were divided into two groups: the minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation group and the conventional extracorporeal circulation group. Propensity matching was employed for further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 242 patients, the minimally invasive group and conventional group comprised 166 patients and 76 patients, respectively. In the matched cohort of 71 pairs, the two groups had similar preoperative characteristics. Extracorporeal circulation time was similar between the minimally invasive and conventional groups: 113 and 115 min, respectively, as was aortic clamp time: 86 and 82 min, respectively. Estimated amount of haemodilution was lower in the minimally invasive group (16.8 vs. 18.8%, P = 0.006). Blood transfusion frequency during surgery was less than half of conventional in the minimally invasive group (12.7 vs. 31.0%, P = 0.01). There were no deaths or stroke in either group during the hospital stay. Asymptomatic brain injury rate was the same for the two groups (35.2 vs. 35.2%, P = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation was associated with fewer patients requiring transfusion than conventional extracorporeal circulation without an increase of asymptomatic brain injury in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729723/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是评估微创体外循环对输血和无症状脑损伤的影响,与传统体外循环相比,通过右侧小开胸手术微创主动脉瓣置换术。方法:回顾性观察性研究。通过右侧小开胸手术行孤立主动脉瓣置换术的患者分为微创体外循环组和常规体外循环组。进一步分析采用倾向匹配法。结果:242例患者中,微创组166例,常规组76例。在71对配对队列中,两组术前特征相似。微创组和常规组体外循环时间相似,分别为113 min和115 min,主动脉夹持时间分别为86 min和82 min。微创组估计血液稀释量较低(16.8% vs 18.8%, P = 0.006)。微创组术中输血次数少于常规组的一半(12.7% vs 31.0%, P = 0.01)。两组患者在住院期间均未发生死亡或中风。两组无症状脑损伤发生率相同(35.2% vs 35.2%, P = 1.00)。结论:微创体外循环与常规体外循环相比,需要输血的患者较少,且无症状脑损伤增加。
Benefit of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy using femoral cannulation: a propensity-matched analysis.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on blood transfusion and asymptomatic brain injury in comparison to conventional extracorporeal circulation in the context of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy surgery.
Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy surgery were divided into two groups: the minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation group and the conventional extracorporeal circulation group. Propensity matching was employed for further analysis.
Results: Of 242 patients, the minimally invasive group and conventional group comprised 166 patients and 76 patients, respectively. In the matched cohort of 71 pairs, the two groups had similar preoperative characteristics. Extracorporeal circulation time was similar between the minimally invasive and conventional groups: 113 and 115 min, respectively, as was aortic clamp time: 86 and 82 min, respectively. Estimated amount of haemodilution was lower in the minimally invasive group (16.8 vs. 18.8%, P = 0.006). Blood transfusion frequency during surgery was less than half of conventional in the minimally invasive group (12.7 vs. 31.0%, P = 0.01). There were no deaths or stroke in either group during the hospital stay. Asymptomatic brain injury rate was the same for the two groups (35.2 vs. 35.2%, P = 1.00).
Conclusions: Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation was associated with fewer patients requiring transfusion than conventional extracorporeal circulation without an increase of asymptomatic brain injury in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right lateral mini-thoracotomy surgery.