Claire Spargo, Kate Laver, Zoe Adey-Wakeling, Angela Berndt, Stacey George
{"title":"澳大利亚职业治疗师对老年痴呆症和轻度认知障碍患者驾驶安全问题管理的看法。","authors":"Claire Spargo, Kate Laver, Zoe Adey-Wakeling, Angela Berndt, Stacey George","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.13008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Driving safety may be compromised in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Occupational therapists assess and screen for driving safety in older people with cognitive impairment. However, little is known about their perspectives relating to these assessments. Aims included to (1) obtain perspectives from driver-trained and non-driver-trained occupational therapists about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI; (2) understand factors influencing clinician's behaviour relating to driving assessment; and (3) gain perspectives regarding resources to support fitness-to-drive assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with occupational therapists recruited from driving assessment services, hospitals, and community settings in Australia. Data were analysed inductively using content analysis, followed by a deductive approach with two authors mapping subcategories to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and community involvement</h3>\n \n <p>No consumers were involved in the design or study analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 17) reported inconsistencies in how the fitness-to-drive assessment is managed, with driving safety concerns often missed or avoided. Perceived barriers to fitness-to-drive assessment included: (i) clinician's capabilities: limited knowledge about fitness-to-drive assessment, and difficulties having complex discussions with patients with cognitive impairment; (ii) motivational factors: lack of confidence, fear of damaging therapeutic relationship with patients, and desire to maintain a sense of professional identity; and (iii) environmental factors: lack of processes to support health professionals with identifying cognitive concerns, lack of clarity of who takes responsibility for managing driving safety concerns, time constraints for completing in-office assessments and limited access to practical occupational therapy driving assessments. Participants expressed a desire for an evidence-based clinical pathway to improve the knowledge and communication skills of clinicians from non-driving specialist settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings identify the need for an evidence-based pathway to support health professionals in managing driving safety concerns for people with dementia and MCI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are brain conditions involving difficulty with memory and thinking, with dementia diagnosed when the changes are more severe. These conditions are not a normal part of getting older, but they are much more common in older people. Research has found that some, but not all, people with dementia and MCI show unsafe driving behaviours. As people with dementia and MCI are often unaware that their driving is unsafe, health professionals, such as doctors and occupational therapists, should be involved in deciding if, or when, they should stop driving. In this study, occupational therapists were asked to provide their opinions about how driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI are managed by health professionals. Occupational therapists reported that there is variation in how concerns are managed, with driving problems often getting missed or avoided. They reported that this can happen because health professionals may not feel confident in their decision-making abilities, or they may feel that discussing driving concerns will cause the person to get upset or angry with them. They also reported that health professionals may not always know that a person has dementia or MCI, and if they do know, it is not always clear which health professional should take on the responsibility of considering the person's driving safety. The occupational therapists wanted a resource to support health professionals in providing more consistent care for patients relating to driving safety.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian occupational therapists' perspectives about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment\",\"authors\":\"Claire Spargo, Kate Laver, Zoe Adey-Wakeling, Angela Berndt, Stacey George\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.13008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Driving safety may be compromised in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Occupational therapists assess and screen for driving safety in older people with cognitive impairment. However, little is known about their perspectives relating to these assessments. Aims included to (1) obtain perspectives from driver-trained and non-driver-trained occupational therapists about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI; (2) understand factors influencing clinician's behaviour relating to driving assessment; and (3) gain perspectives regarding resources to support fitness-to-drive assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with occupational therapists recruited from driving assessment services, hospitals, and community settings in Australia. Data were analysed inductively using content analysis, followed by a deductive approach with two authors mapping subcategories to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Consumer and community involvement</h3>\\n \\n <p>No consumers were involved in the design or study analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 17) reported inconsistencies in how the fitness-to-drive assessment is managed, with driving safety concerns often missed or avoided. Perceived barriers to fitness-to-drive assessment included: (i) clinician's capabilities: limited knowledge about fitness-to-drive assessment, and difficulties having complex discussions with patients with cognitive impairment; (ii) motivational factors: lack of confidence, fear of damaging therapeutic relationship with patients, and desire to maintain a sense of professional identity; and (iii) environmental factors: lack of processes to support health professionals with identifying cognitive concerns, lack of clarity of who takes responsibility for managing driving safety concerns, time constraints for completing in-office assessments and limited access to practical occupational therapy driving assessments. Participants expressed a desire for an evidence-based clinical pathway to improve the knowledge and communication skills of clinicians from non-driving specialist settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings identify the need for an evidence-based pathway to support health professionals in managing driving safety concerns for people with dementia and MCI.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are brain conditions involving difficulty with memory and thinking, with dementia diagnosed when the changes are more severe. These conditions are not a normal part of getting older, but they are much more common in older people. Research has found that some, but not all, people with dementia and MCI show unsafe driving behaviours. As people with dementia and MCI are often unaware that their driving is unsafe, health professionals, such as doctors and occupational therapists, should be involved in deciding if, or when, they should stop driving. In this study, occupational therapists were asked to provide their opinions about how driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI are managed by health professionals. Occupational therapists reported that there is variation in how concerns are managed, with driving problems often getting missed or avoided. They reported that this can happen because health professionals may not feel confident in their decision-making abilities, or they may feel that discussing driving concerns will cause the person to get upset or angry with them. They also reported that health professionals may not always know that a person has dementia or MCI, and if they do know, it is not always clear which health professional should take on the responsibility of considering the person's driving safety. The occupational therapists wanted a resource to support health professionals in providing more consistent care for patients relating to driving safety.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.13008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.13008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Australian occupational therapists' perspectives about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment
Introduction
Driving safety may be compromised in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Occupational therapists assess and screen for driving safety in older people with cognitive impairment. However, little is known about their perspectives relating to these assessments. Aims included to (1) obtain perspectives from driver-trained and non-driver-trained occupational therapists about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI; (2) understand factors influencing clinician's behaviour relating to driving assessment; and (3) gain perspectives regarding resources to support fitness-to-drive assessment.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with occupational therapists recruited from driving assessment services, hospitals, and community settings in Australia. Data were analysed inductively using content analysis, followed by a deductive approach with two authors mapping subcategories to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour model.
Consumer and community involvement
No consumers were involved in the design or study analysis.
Findings
Participants (n = 17) reported inconsistencies in how the fitness-to-drive assessment is managed, with driving safety concerns often missed or avoided. Perceived barriers to fitness-to-drive assessment included: (i) clinician's capabilities: limited knowledge about fitness-to-drive assessment, and difficulties having complex discussions with patients with cognitive impairment; (ii) motivational factors: lack of confidence, fear of damaging therapeutic relationship with patients, and desire to maintain a sense of professional identity; and (iii) environmental factors: lack of processes to support health professionals with identifying cognitive concerns, lack of clarity of who takes responsibility for managing driving safety concerns, time constraints for completing in-office assessments and limited access to practical occupational therapy driving assessments. Participants expressed a desire for an evidence-based clinical pathway to improve the knowledge and communication skills of clinicians from non-driving specialist settings.
Conclusion
Findings identify the need for an evidence-based pathway to support health professionals in managing driving safety concerns for people with dementia and MCI.
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY
Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are brain conditions involving difficulty with memory and thinking, with dementia diagnosed when the changes are more severe. These conditions are not a normal part of getting older, but they are much more common in older people. Research has found that some, but not all, people with dementia and MCI show unsafe driving behaviours. As people with dementia and MCI are often unaware that their driving is unsafe, health professionals, such as doctors and occupational therapists, should be involved in deciding if, or when, they should stop driving. In this study, occupational therapists were asked to provide their opinions about how driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI are managed by health professionals. Occupational therapists reported that there is variation in how concerns are managed, with driving problems often getting missed or avoided. They reported that this can happen because health professionals may not feel confident in their decision-making abilities, or they may feel that discussing driving concerns will cause the person to get upset or angry with them. They also reported that health professionals may not always know that a person has dementia or MCI, and if they do know, it is not always clear which health professional should take on the responsibility of considering the person's driving safety. The occupational therapists wanted a resource to support health professionals in providing more consistent care for patients relating to driving safety.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design
The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.