澳大利亚职业治疗师对老年痴呆症和轻度认知障碍患者驾驶安全问题管理的看法。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Claire Spargo, Kate Laver, Zoe Adey-Wakeling, Angela Berndt, Stacey George
{"title":"澳大利亚职业治疗师对老年痴呆症和轻度认知障碍患者驾驶安全问题管理的看法。","authors":"Claire Spargo,&nbsp;Kate Laver,&nbsp;Zoe Adey-Wakeling,&nbsp;Angela Berndt,&nbsp;Stacey George","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.13008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Driving safety may be compromised in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Occupational therapists assess and screen for driving safety in older people with cognitive impairment. However, little is known about their perspectives relating to these assessments. Aims included to (1) obtain perspectives from driver-trained and non-driver-trained occupational therapists about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI; (2) understand factors influencing clinician's behaviour relating to driving assessment; and (3) gain perspectives regarding resources to support fitness-to-drive assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with occupational therapists recruited from driving assessment services, hospitals, and community settings in Australia. Data were analysed inductively using content analysis, followed by a deductive approach with two authors mapping subcategories to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and community involvement</h3>\n \n <p>No consumers were involved in the design or study analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 17) reported inconsistencies in how the fitness-to-drive assessment is managed, with driving safety concerns often missed or avoided. Perceived barriers to fitness-to-drive assessment included: (i) clinician's capabilities: limited knowledge about fitness-to-drive assessment, and difficulties having complex discussions with patients with cognitive impairment; (ii) motivational factors: lack of confidence, fear of damaging therapeutic relationship with patients, and desire to maintain a sense of professional identity; and (iii) environmental factors: lack of processes to support health professionals with identifying cognitive concerns, lack of clarity of who takes responsibility for managing driving safety concerns, time constraints for completing in-office assessments and limited access to practical occupational therapy driving assessments. Participants expressed a desire for an evidence-based clinical pathway to improve the knowledge and communication skills of clinicians from non-driving specialist settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings identify the need for an evidence-based pathway to support health professionals in managing driving safety concerns for people with dementia and MCI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are brain conditions involving difficulty with memory and thinking, with dementia diagnosed when the changes are more severe. These conditions are not a normal part of getting older, but they are much more common in older people. Research has found that some, but not all, people with dementia and MCI show unsafe driving behaviours. As people with dementia and MCI are often unaware that their driving is unsafe, health professionals, such as doctors and occupational therapists, should be involved in deciding if, or when, they should stop driving. In this study, occupational therapists were asked to provide their opinions about how driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI are managed by health professionals. Occupational therapists reported that there is variation in how concerns are managed, with driving problems often getting missed or avoided. They reported that this can happen because health professionals may not feel confident in their decision-making abilities, or they may feel that discussing driving concerns will cause the person to get upset or angry with them. They also reported that health professionals may not always know that a person has dementia or MCI, and if they do know, it is not always clear which health professional should take on the responsibility of considering the person's driving safety. The occupational therapists wanted a resource to support health professionals in providing more consistent care for patients relating to driving safety.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian occupational therapists' perspectives about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment\",\"authors\":\"Claire Spargo,&nbsp;Kate Laver,&nbsp;Zoe Adey-Wakeling,&nbsp;Angela Berndt,&nbsp;Stacey George\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.13008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Driving safety may be compromised in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Occupational therapists assess and screen for driving safety in older people with cognitive impairment. However, little is known about their perspectives relating to these assessments. Aims included to (1) obtain perspectives from driver-trained and non-driver-trained occupational therapists about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI; (2) understand factors influencing clinician's behaviour relating to driving assessment; and (3) gain perspectives regarding resources to support fitness-to-drive assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with occupational therapists recruited from driving assessment services, hospitals, and community settings in Australia. Data were analysed inductively using content analysis, followed by a deductive approach with two authors mapping subcategories to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Consumer and community involvement</h3>\\n \\n <p>No consumers were involved in the design or study analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 17) reported inconsistencies in how the fitness-to-drive assessment is managed, with driving safety concerns often missed or avoided. Perceived barriers to fitness-to-drive assessment included: (i) clinician's capabilities: limited knowledge about fitness-to-drive assessment, and difficulties having complex discussions with patients with cognitive impairment; (ii) motivational factors: lack of confidence, fear of damaging therapeutic relationship with patients, and desire to maintain a sense of professional identity; and (iii) environmental factors: lack of processes to support health professionals with identifying cognitive concerns, lack of clarity of who takes responsibility for managing driving safety concerns, time constraints for completing in-office assessments and limited access to practical occupational therapy driving assessments. Participants expressed a desire for an evidence-based clinical pathway to improve the knowledge and communication skills of clinicians from non-driving specialist settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings identify the need for an evidence-based pathway to support health professionals in managing driving safety concerns for people with dementia and MCI.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are brain conditions involving difficulty with memory and thinking, with dementia diagnosed when the changes are more severe. These conditions are not a normal part of getting older, but they are much more common in older people. Research has found that some, but not all, people with dementia and MCI show unsafe driving behaviours. As people with dementia and MCI are often unaware that their driving is unsafe, health professionals, such as doctors and occupational therapists, should be involved in deciding if, or when, they should stop driving. In this study, occupational therapists were asked to provide their opinions about how driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI are managed by health professionals. Occupational therapists reported that there is variation in how concerns are managed, with driving problems often getting missed or avoided. They reported that this can happen because health professionals may not feel confident in their decision-making abilities, or they may feel that discussing driving concerns will cause the person to get upset or angry with them. They also reported that health professionals may not always know that a person has dementia or MCI, and if they do know, it is not always clear which health professional should take on the responsibility of considering the person's driving safety. The occupational therapists wanted a resource to support health professionals in providing more consistent care for patients relating to driving safety.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.13008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.13008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:痴呆或轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的驾驶安全可能会受到损害。职业治疗师评估和筛选有认知障碍的老年人的驾驶安全。然而,人们对他们与这些评估有关的观点知之甚少。目的包括:(1)从驾驶员培训和非驾驶员培训的职业治疗师那里了解老年痴呆和轻度认知损伤患者驾驶安全问题的管理;(2)了解影响临床医生驾驶评估行为的因素;(3)获得支持健康驱动评估的资源视角。方法:对从澳大利亚驾驶评估服务机构、医院和社区招募的职业治疗师进行半结构化访谈。数据使用内容分析进行归纳分析,随后由两位作者采用演绎方法将子类别映射到理论领域框架和能力,机会和动机-行为模型的领域。消费者和社区参与:没有消费者参与设计或研究分析。研究结果:参与者(n = 17)报告了在如何管理健康驾驶评估方面的不一致,驾驶安全问题经常被忽略或避免。认知障碍包括:(i)临床医生的能力:对健康驾驶评估的知识有限,难以与认知障碍患者进行复杂的讨论;(ii)动机因素:缺乏信心,害怕破坏与患者的治疗关系,并希望保持职业认同感;(三)环境因素:缺乏支持卫生专业人员识别认知问题的程序,不清楚谁负责管理驾驶安全问题,完成办公室评估的时间有限,获得实用职业治疗驾驶评估的机会有限。与会者表达了对循证临床途径的渴望,以提高临床医生的知识和沟通技巧,从非驾驶的专家设置。结论:研究结果确定了需要一个以证据为基础的途径来支持卫生专业人员管理痴呆和轻度认知障碍患者的驾驶安全问题。简单的语言总结:痴呆症和轻度认知障碍(MCI)是涉及记忆和思维困难的大脑疾病,当变化更严重时就可以诊断为痴呆症。这些情况不是变老的正常部分,但它们在老年人中更为常见。研究发现,一些(但不是全部)患有痴呆症和轻度认知障碍的人表现出不安全的驾驶行为。由于痴呆症和轻度认知障碍患者通常没有意识到他们的驾驶是不安全的,医生和职业治疗师等卫生专业人员应该参与决定他们是否或何时应该停止驾驶。在这项研究中,职业治疗师被要求就卫生专业人员如何管理老年痴呆症和轻度认知障碍患者的驾驶安全问题提供意见。职业治疗师报告说,在如何管理担忧方面存在差异,驾驶问题经常被忽视或避免。他们报告说,这可能是因为卫生专业人员可能对自己的决策能力没有信心,或者他们可能觉得讨论驾驶问题会让人感到不安或生气。他们还报告说,卫生专业人员可能并不总是知道一个人患有痴呆症或轻度认知障碍,即使他们知道,也并不总是清楚哪个卫生专业人员应该承担考虑该人驾驶安全的责任。职业治疗师需要一种资源来支持卫生专业人员为患者提供与驾驶安全有关的更一致的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Australian occupational therapists' perspectives about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment

Introduction

Driving safety may be compromised in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Occupational therapists assess and screen for driving safety in older people with cognitive impairment. However, little is known about their perspectives relating to these assessments. Aims included to (1) obtain perspectives from driver-trained and non-driver-trained occupational therapists about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI; (2) understand factors influencing clinician's behaviour relating to driving assessment; and (3) gain perspectives regarding resources to support fitness-to-drive assessment.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with occupational therapists recruited from driving assessment services, hospitals, and community settings in Australia. Data were analysed inductively using content analysis, followed by a deductive approach with two authors mapping subcategories to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour model.

Consumer and community involvement

No consumers were involved in the design or study analysis.

Findings

Participants (n = 17) reported inconsistencies in how the fitness-to-drive assessment is managed, with driving safety concerns often missed or avoided. Perceived barriers to fitness-to-drive assessment included: (i) clinician's capabilities: limited knowledge about fitness-to-drive assessment, and difficulties having complex discussions with patients with cognitive impairment; (ii) motivational factors: lack of confidence, fear of damaging therapeutic relationship with patients, and desire to maintain a sense of professional identity; and (iii) environmental factors: lack of processes to support health professionals with identifying cognitive concerns, lack of clarity of who takes responsibility for managing driving safety concerns, time constraints for completing in-office assessments and limited access to practical occupational therapy driving assessments. Participants expressed a desire for an evidence-based clinical pathway to improve the knowledge and communication skills of clinicians from non-driving specialist settings.

Conclusion

Findings identify the need for an evidence-based pathway to support health professionals in managing driving safety concerns for people with dementia and MCI.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are brain conditions involving difficulty with memory and thinking, with dementia diagnosed when the changes are more severe. These conditions are not a normal part of getting older, but they are much more common in older people. Research has found that some, but not all, people with dementia and MCI show unsafe driving behaviours. As people with dementia and MCI are often unaware that their driving is unsafe, health professionals, such as doctors and occupational therapists, should be involved in deciding if, or when, they should stop driving. In this study, occupational therapists were asked to provide their opinions about how driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI are managed by health professionals. Occupational therapists reported that there is variation in how concerns are managed, with driving problems often getting missed or avoided. They reported that this can happen because health professionals may not feel confident in their decision-making abilities, or they may feel that discussing driving concerns will cause the person to get upset or angry with them. They also reported that health professionals may not always know that a person has dementia or MCI, and if they do know, it is not always clear which health professional should take on the responsibility of considering the person's driving safety. The occupational therapists wanted a resource to support health professionals in providing more consistent care for patients relating to driving safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信