Takaya Watabe , Takuya Sengoku , Masafumi Kubota , Goro Sakurai , Shinya Yoshida , Yuta Taniguchi
{"title":"膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分和膝关节社会评分对保留十字架全膝关节置换术后的最小临床重要差异:两年随访。","authors":"Takaya Watabe , Takuya Sengoku , Masafumi Kubota , Goro Sakurai , Shinya Yoshida , Yuta Taniguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.12.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study investigated changes in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of these scores preoperatively to 2 years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study included 168 patients who underwent primary cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA using the subvastus approach. The KOOS and KSS were assessed preoperatively and during the 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow ups. The MCIDs of the KOOS and KSS were calculated using distribution-based methods with standard deviation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patient-reported outcome measures improved considerably from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively. KOOS pain and symptom scores considerably improved at approximately 2 years postoperatively, with KOOS activities of daily living (ADL) and sports/recreation subscale scores showing rapid improvement within 3 months, followed by smaller gains. MCID thresholds for KOOS subscales were as follows: pain, 14.3–15.3; symptoms, 14.1–15.6; ADL, 15.2–16.0; sport/recreation, 11.7–11.8; and quality of life, 13.6–14.4. KSS objective knee indicators and satisfaction improved considerably approximately 2 years postoperatively; however, scores on the expectation and functional activity subscales did not improve after 1 year. MCID thresholds for KSS subscales were as follows: objective knee indicators, 4.6–4.7; satisfaction, 4.9–5.0; expectation, 2.4; and functional activities, 12.0–12.3.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Improvements in the KSS objective knee indicators and KOOS subjective pain and symptom scores were similar over the 2-year follow up. These findings may help better understand the expected outcomes of CR-type TKA, especially in severe osteoarthritis cases, thereby informing patient counseling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 176-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score and knee society score for the minimal clinically important differences after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: Two-year follow up\",\"authors\":\"Takaya Watabe , Takuya Sengoku , Masafumi Kubota , Goro Sakurai , Shinya Yoshida , Yuta Taniguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.12.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study investigated changes in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of these scores preoperatively to 2 years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study included 168 patients who underwent primary cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA using the subvastus approach. The KOOS and KSS were assessed preoperatively and during the 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow ups. The MCIDs of the KOOS and KSS were calculated using distribution-based methods with standard deviation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patient-reported outcome measures improved considerably from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively. KOOS pain and symptom scores considerably improved at approximately 2 years postoperatively, with KOOS activities of daily living (ADL) and sports/recreation subscale scores showing rapid improvement within 3 months, followed by smaller gains. MCID thresholds for KOOS subscales were as follows: pain, 14.3–15.3; symptoms, 14.1–15.6; ADL, 15.2–16.0; sport/recreation, 11.7–11.8; and quality of life, 13.6–14.4. KSS objective knee indicators and satisfaction improved considerably approximately 2 years postoperatively; however, scores on the expectation and functional activity subscales did not improve after 1 year. MCID thresholds for KSS subscales were as follows: objective knee indicators, 4.6–4.7; satisfaction, 4.9–5.0; expectation, 2.4; and functional activities, 12.0–12.3.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Improvements in the KSS objective knee indicators and KOOS subjective pain and symptom scores were similar over the 2-year follow up. These findings may help better understand the expected outcomes of CR-type TKA, especially in severe osteoarthritis cases, thereby informing patient counseling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 176-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024002758\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024002758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score and knee society score for the minimal clinically important differences after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: Two-year follow up
Background
This study investigated changes in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of these scores preoperatively to 2 years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods
This single-center retrospective study included 168 patients who underwent primary cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA using the subvastus approach. The KOOS and KSS were assessed preoperatively and during the 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow ups. The MCIDs of the KOOS and KSS were calculated using distribution-based methods with standard deviation.
Results
All patient-reported outcome measures improved considerably from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively. KOOS pain and symptom scores considerably improved at approximately 2 years postoperatively, with KOOS activities of daily living (ADL) and sports/recreation subscale scores showing rapid improvement within 3 months, followed by smaller gains. MCID thresholds for KOOS subscales were as follows: pain, 14.3–15.3; symptoms, 14.1–15.6; ADL, 15.2–16.0; sport/recreation, 11.7–11.8; and quality of life, 13.6–14.4. KSS objective knee indicators and satisfaction improved considerably approximately 2 years postoperatively; however, scores on the expectation and functional activity subscales did not improve after 1 year. MCID thresholds for KSS subscales were as follows: objective knee indicators, 4.6–4.7; satisfaction, 4.9–5.0; expectation, 2.4; and functional activities, 12.0–12.3.
Conclusions
Improvements in the KSS objective knee indicators and KOOS subjective pain and symptom scores were similar over the 2-year follow up. These findings may help better understand the expected outcomes of CR-type TKA, especially in severe osteoarthritis cases, thereby informing patient counseling.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.