老年认知障碍患者服药依从性反馈:一项混合方法研究。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kelli L Sullivan, Emily S Hallowell, Allyson Goldstein, Persis V Commissariat, Lori A Daiello, Jennifer D Davis, Seth A Margolis
{"title":"老年认知障碍患者服药依从性反馈:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Kelli L Sullivan, Emily S Hallowell, Allyson Goldstein, Persis V Commissariat, Lori A Daiello, Jennifer D Davis, Seth A Margolis","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2447094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Older adults with cognitive impairment are at risk of medication-taking errors. This study assessed the impact of providing medication adherence feedback to cognitively impaired older adults. <b>Methods:</b> Forty participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia had their medication adherence electronically monitored for 8 weeks. They were provided with verbal and visual feedback about their adherence results. Initial participant reactions were elicited using a Motivational Interviewing approach, and self-reported behavior changes were assessed during a follow-up interview. Quantitative analyses assessed relationships among electronically monitored and self-rated adherence, initial reactions to adherence feedback, and subsequently reported medication self-management changes. Thematic analysis determined facilitators and barriers to making self-management changes. <b>Results:</b> Although self-rated adherence was high, electronic monitoring revealed that 20% of the sample had suboptimal adherence (took the recommended dose on <80% of monitored days). Fifty-three percent of the sample reported feeling surprised by their adherence results, and 45% endorsed initial motivation to change self-management behaviors. Motivated participants demonstrated worse electronically monitored adherence than unmotivated peers, and those who were surprised by their medication-taking errors expressed greater initial motivation to change. At follow-up, 50% reported having made changes, and 82.4% of them indicated that this study played a role. Facilitators of making changes included awareness of medication-taking errors and cognitive impairment, whereas barriers included lack of perceived difficulty/need. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adherence monitoring with feedback is feasible and impactful in cognitively impaired older adults. Increasing awareness of medication-taking errors fosters motivation to improve medication self-management and results in participant-reported behavior change.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication adherence feedback with older adults with cognitive impairment: a mixed Methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Kelli L Sullivan, Emily S Hallowell, Allyson Goldstein, Persis V Commissariat, Lori A Daiello, Jennifer D Davis, Seth A Margolis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2024.2447094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Older adults with cognitive impairment are at risk of medication-taking errors. This study assessed the impact of providing medication adherence feedback to cognitively impaired older adults. <b>Methods:</b> Forty participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia had their medication adherence electronically monitored for 8 weeks. They were provided with verbal and visual feedback about their adherence results. Initial participant reactions were elicited using a Motivational Interviewing approach, and self-reported behavior changes were assessed during a follow-up interview. Quantitative analyses assessed relationships among electronically monitored and self-rated adherence, initial reactions to adherence feedback, and subsequently reported medication self-management changes. Thematic analysis determined facilitators and barriers to making self-management changes. <b>Results:</b> Although self-rated adherence was high, electronic monitoring revealed that 20% of the sample had suboptimal adherence (took the recommended dose on <80% of monitored days). Fifty-three percent of the sample reported feeling surprised by their adherence results, and 45% endorsed initial motivation to change self-management behaviors. Motivated participants demonstrated worse electronically monitored adherence than unmotivated peers, and those who were surprised by their medication-taking errors expressed greater initial motivation to change. At follow-up, 50% reported having made changes, and 82.4% of them indicated that this study played a role. Facilitators of making changes included awareness of medication-taking errors and cognitive impairment, whereas barriers included lack of perceived difficulty/need. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adherence monitoring with feedback is feasible and impactful in cognitively impaired older adults. Increasing awareness of medication-taking errors fosters motivation to improve medication self-management and results in participant-reported behavior change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2447094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2447094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:老年认知障碍患者存在服药错误的风险。本研究评估了提供药物依从性反馈对认知受损老年人的影响。方法:对40名轻度认知障碍或轻度痴呆患者进行为期8周的药物依从性电子监测。他们获得了关于依从性结果的口头和视觉反馈。最初的参与者反应是通过动机性访谈的方法引起的,自我报告的行为变化是在后续访谈中评估的。定量分析评估了电子监测和自评依从性之间的关系,对依从性反馈的初始反应,以及随后报告的药物自我管理变化。专题分析确定了自我管理变革的促进因素和障碍。结果:虽然自我评价的依从性很高,但电子监测显示,20%的样本的依从性不理想(服用推荐剂量)结论:反馈依从性监测在认知障碍的老年人中是可行和有效的。提高对服药错误的认识可以促进改善服药自我管理的动机,并导致参与者报告的行为改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medication adherence feedback with older adults with cognitive impairment: a mixed Methods study.

Objective: Older adults with cognitive impairment are at risk of medication-taking errors. This study assessed the impact of providing medication adherence feedback to cognitively impaired older adults. Methods: Forty participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia had their medication adherence electronically monitored for 8 weeks. They were provided with verbal and visual feedback about their adherence results. Initial participant reactions were elicited using a Motivational Interviewing approach, and self-reported behavior changes were assessed during a follow-up interview. Quantitative analyses assessed relationships among electronically monitored and self-rated adherence, initial reactions to adherence feedback, and subsequently reported medication self-management changes. Thematic analysis determined facilitators and barriers to making self-management changes. Results: Although self-rated adherence was high, electronic monitoring revealed that 20% of the sample had suboptimal adherence (took the recommended dose on <80% of monitored days). Fifty-three percent of the sample reported feeling surprised by their adherence results, and 45% endorsed initial motivation to change self-management behaviors. Motivated participants demonstrated worse electronically monitored adherence than unmotivated peers, and those who were surprised by their medication-taking errors expressed greater initial motivation to change. At follow-up, 50% reported having made changes, and 82.4% of them indicated that this study played a role. Facilitators of making changes included awareness of medication-taking errors and cognitive impairment, whereas barriers included lack of perceived difficulty/need. Conclusions: Adherence monitoring with feedback is feasible and impactful in cognitively impaired older adults. Increasing awareness of medication-taking errors fosters motivation to improve medication self-management and results in participant-reported behavior change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信