脑卒中后认知障碍的预测模型:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Yifang Yang, Yajing Chen, Yiyi Yang, Tingting Yang, Tingting Wu, Junbo Chen, Fanghong Yan, Lin Han, Yuxia Ma
{"title":"脑卒中后认知障碍的预测模型:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yifang Yang, Yajing Chen, Yiyi Yang, Tingting Yang, Tingting Wu, Junbo Chen, Fanghong Yan, Lin Han, Yuxia Ma","doi":"10.1111/phn.13509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is one of the most serious illnesses worldwide and is the primary cause of acquired disability among adults. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a complication of stroke that significantly impacts patients' daily activities and social functions. Therefore, developing a risk prediction model for PSCI is essential for identifying and preventing disease progression.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study systematically reviewed and analyzed PSCI prediction models, identifying the associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically retrieved literature from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and other sources. Two researchers independently extracted the literature and assessed the risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist and The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 articles describe the PSCI prediction model, with an incidence rate ranging from 8% to 75%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value for the development models ranged from 0.66 to 0.969, while the validation models ranged from 0.763 to 0.893. Age, diabetes, hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hypertension, and homocysteine (hcy) were identified as the strongest predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this systematic review, several PSCI prediction models demonstrate promising prediction performance, although they often lack external validation and exhibit high heterogeneity in some predictive factors. Therefore, we recommend that medical practitioners utilize a comprehensive set of predictive factors to screen for high-risk PSCI patients. Furthermore, future research should prioritize refining and validating existing models by incorporating novel variables and methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54533,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction Models for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yifang Yang, Yajing Chen, Yiyi Yang, Tingting Yang, Tingting Wu, Junbo Chen, Fanghong Yan, Lin Han, Yuxia Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/phn.13509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is one of the most serious illnesses worldwide and is the primary cause of acquired disability among adults. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a complication of stroke that significantly impacts patients' daily activities and social functions. Therefore, developing a risk prediction model for PSCI is essential for identifying and preventing disease progression.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study systematically reviewed and analyzed PSCI prediction models, identifying the associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically retrieved literature from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and other sources. Two researchers independently extracted the literature and assessed the risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist and The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 articles describe the PSCI prediction model, with an incidence rate ranging from 8% to 75%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value for the development models ranged from 0.66 to 0.969, while the validation models ranged from 0.763 to 0.893. Age, diabetes, hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hypertension, and homocysteine (hcy) were identified as the strongest predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this systematic review, several PSCI prediction models demonstrate promising prediction performance, although they often lack external validation and exhibit high heterogeneity in some predictive factors. Therefore, we recommend that medical practitioners utilize a comprehensive set of predictive factors to screen for high-risk PSCI patients. Furthermore, future research should prioritize refining and validating existing models by incorporating novel variables and methodologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13509\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中风是世界范围内最严重的疾病之一,是成人获得性残疾的主要原因。脑卒中后认知障碍(PSCI)是脑卒中的一种并发症,严重影响患者的日常活动和社会功能。因此,建立PSCI的风险预测模型对于识别和预防疾病进展至关重要。目的:本研究系统回顾和分析PSCI预测模型,识别相关危险因素。方法:系统地检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和其他来源的文献。两名研究人员独立提取文献,并使用预测模型研究系统评价的关键评估和数据提取(CHARMS)检查表和预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚风险。结果:共有20篇文章描述了PSCI预测模型,发生率在8% ~ 75%之间。开发模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.66 ~ 0.969,验证模型为0.763 ~ 0.893。年龄、糖尿病、超敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、高血压和同型半胱氨酸(hcy)被认为是最强的预测因子。结论:在本系统综述中,几种PSCI预测模型显示出良好的预测性能,尽管它们往往缺乏外部验证,并且在某些预测因素上表现出较高的异质性。因此,我们建议医生利用一套全面的预测因素来筛选高危PSCI患者。此外,未来的研究应该优先考虑通过结合新的变量和方法来改进和验证现有的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction Models for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Stroke is one of the most serious illnesses worldwide and is the primary cause of acquired disability among adults. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a complication of stroke that significantly impacts patients' daily activities and social functions. Therefore, developing a risk prediction model for PSCI is essential for identifying and preventing disease progression.

Objectives: This study systematically reviewed and analyzed PSCI prediction models, identifying the associated risk factors.

Methods: We systematically retrieved literature from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and other sources. Two researchers independently extracted the literature and assessed the risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist and The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

Results: A total of 20 articles describe the PSCI prediction model, with an incidence rate ranging from 8% to 75%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value for the development models ranged from 0.66 to 0.969, while the validation models ranged from 0.763 to 0.893. Age, diabetes, hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hypertension, and homocysteine (hcy) were identified as the strongest predictors.

Conclusion: In this systematic review, several PSCI prediction models demonstrate promising prediction performance, although they often lack external validation and exhibit high heterogeneity in some predictive factors. Therefore, we recommend that medical practitioners utilize a comprehensive set of predictive factors to screen for high-risk PSCI patients. Furthermore, future research should prioritize refining and validating existing models by incorporating novel variables and methodologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nursing
Public Health Nursing 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Nursing publishes empirical research reports, program evaluations, and case reports focused on populations at risk across the lifespan. The journal also prints articles related to developments in practice, education of public health nurses, theory development, methodological innovations, legal, ethical, and public policy issues in public health, and the history of public health nursing throughout the world. While the primary readership of the Journal is North American, the journal is expanding its mission to address global public health concerns of interest to nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信