原发性未知的疑似头颈部癌的调查趋势:一项HNCIG和IFHNOS国际实践调查。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Andrew Williamson, Paul Nankivell, Ahmed K Abou-Foul, Mohamed Ahmed, Hisham Mehanna
{"title":"原发性未知的疑似头颈部癌的调查趋势:一项HNCIG和IFHNOS国际实践调查。","authors":"Andrew Williamson, Paul Nankivell, Ahmed K Abou-Foul, Mohamed Ahmed, Hisham Mehanna","doi":"10.1002/hed.28065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this clinical survey was to assess variations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary (HNSCCUP) diagnostic practices across international centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical practice survey of experts nominated by Head and Neck Cancer International Group (HNCIG) and International Federation of Head and Neck Oncologic Societies (IFHNOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 48/49 (97.9%) participants. Outpatient laryngoscopy, CT, and 18-FDG-PETCT were used always or most of the time by 81.3%, 77.1%, and 79.2%, but only 50% regularly used MRI. Unilateral and bilateral tonsillectomy were frequently performed in 41.6% and 27.1% of unilateral nodal disease, and in 18.8% and 52.1% for bilateral disease. Ipsilateral Tongue Base Mucosectomy (TBM) was used always or most of the time in 12.5% of unilateral and 6.3% of bilateral HNSCCUP. Bilateral TBM was used in 10.4% for unilateral and 22.9% for bilateral cancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there is broad agreement regarding examination and cross-sectional imaging, there are considerable differences in the surgical strategies used to identify occult primaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Investigations for Suspected Head and Neck Carcinoma of the Unknown Primary: A HNCIG and IFHNOS International Survey of Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Williamson, Paul Nankivell, Ahmed K Abou-Foul, Mohamed Ahmed, Hisham Mehanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.28065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this clinical survey was to assess variations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary (HNSCCUP) diagnostic practices across international centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical practice survey of experts nominated by Head and Neck Cancer International Group (HNCIG) and International Federation of Head and Neck Oncologic Societies (IFHNOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 48/49 (97.9%) participants. Outpatient laryngoscopy, CT, and 18-FDG-PETCT were used always or most of the time by 81.3%, 77.1%, and 79.2%, but only 50% regularly used MRI. Unilateral and bilateral tonsillectomy were frequently performed in 41.6% and 27.1% of unilateral nodal disease, and in 18.8% and 52.1% for bilateral disease. Ipsilateral Tongue Base Mucosectomy (TBM) was used always or most of the time in 12.5% of unilateral and 6.3% of bilateral HNSCCUP. Bilateral TBM was used in 10.4% for unilateral and 22.9% for bilateral cancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there is broad agreement regarding examination and cross-sectional imaging, there are considerable differences in the surgical strategies used to identify occult primaries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本临床调查的目的是评估国际中心的未知原发(HNSCCUP)诊断实践中头颈部鳞状细胞癌的变化。方法:对头颈部肿瘤国际组织(HNCIG)和国际头颈部肿瘤学会联合会(IFHNOS)提名的专家进行临床实践调查。结果:收到48/49(97.9%)名参与者的回复。门诊喉镜检查、CT检查和18-FDG-PETCT检查的比例分别为81.3%、77.1%和79.2%,而定期使用MRI检查的比例仅为50%。单侧和双侧扁桃体切除术的发生率分别为41.6%和27.1%,双侧扁桃体切除术的发生率分别为18.8%和52.1%。12.5%的单侧和6.3%的双侧HNSCCUP患者总是或大部分时间采用同侧舌底粘膜切除术(TBM)。单侧肿瘤10.4%采用双侧TBM,双侧肿瘤22.9%采用双侧TBM。结论:虽然在检查和横断成像方面有广泛的共识,但在用于识别隐匿性原发的手术策略上存在相当大的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Investigations for Suspected Head and Neck Carcinoma of the Unknown Primary: A HNCIG and IFHNOS International Survey of Practice.

Background: The aim of this clinical survey was to assess variations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary (HNSCCUP) diagnostic practices across international centers.

Methods: Clinical practice survey of experts nominated by Head and Neck Cancer International Group (HNCIG) and International Federation of Head and Neck Oncologic Societies (IFHNOS).

Results: Responses were received from 48/49 (97.9%) participants. Outpatient laryngoscopy, CT, and 18-FDG-PETCT were used always or most of the time by 81.3%, 77.1%, and 79.2%, but only 50% regularly used MRI. Unilateral and bilateral tonsillectomy were frequently performed in 41.6% and 27.1% of unilateral nodal disease, and in 18.8% and 52.1% for bilateral disease. Ipsilateral Tongue Base Mucosectomy (TBM) was used always or most of the time in 12.5% of unilateral and 6.3% of bilateral HNSCCUP. Bilateral TBM was used in 10.4% for unilateral and 22.9% for bilateral cancers.

Conclusions: While there is broad agreement regarding examination and cross-sectional imaging, there are considerable differences in the surgical strategies used to identify occult primaries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信