{"title":"三种冷冻治疗技术对tka术后早期疼痛控制的疗效和患者满意度的比较:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Keerati Chareancholvanich, Worawut Keesukpunt, Chaturong Pornrattanamaneewong, Rapeepat Narkbunnam, Atthakorn Jarusriwanna","doi":"10.1186/s42836-024-00287-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryotherapy is a non-pharmacological option that complements drug therapy to achieve the most comprehensive multimodal analgesia. Various techniques are currently available, including the conventional gel cold pack, the cryo-cuff, and a novel mobile cold compression device (MCCD). This study aimed to evaluate and compare three cryotherapy techniques in terms of efficacy and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized study included 108 patients who were scheduled for primary unilateral TKA. The patients were allocated to 3 groups for postoperative cryotherapy techniques: gel cold pack, cryo-cuff, and MCCD. Scores on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, morphine consumption, knee range of motion (ROM), knee swelling, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative VAS scores showed a significant difference among the groups at 8 and 72 h after surgery (P = 0.002 and 0.026, respectively). At the earliest postoperative time point, post hoc analysis demonstrated that patients in the MCCD group had lower pain scores than those in the gel cold pack (P < 0.001) and the cryo-cuff group (P = 0.030). However, cryo-cuff reduced knee swelling significantly compared to gel cold pack (P = 0.028) and MCCD (P = 0.011) at postoperative 72 h. The total satisfaction score was 86.8, 82.8, and 89.1 with gel cold pack, cryo-cuff, and MCCD, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cryotherapy is an adjunct to post-TKA pain control at the surgical site. MCCD has shown superior efficacy in pain reduction during the earliest postoperative period, and achieved high patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry database (no. TCTR20200517002).</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"7 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of three cryotherapy techniques for early post-TKA pain control in terms of efficacy and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Keerati Chareancholvanich, Worawut Keesukpunt, Chaturong Pornrattanamaneewong, Rapeepat Narkbunnam, Atthakorn Jarusriwanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42836-024-00287-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryotherapy is a non-pharmacological option that complements drug therapy to achieve the most comprehensive multimodal analgesia. Various techniques are currently available, including the conventional gel cold pack, the cryo-cuff, and a novel mobile cold compression device (MCCD). This study aimed to evaluate and compare three cryotherapy techniques in terms of efficacy and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized study included 108 patients who were scheduled for primary unilateral TKA. The patients were allocated to 3 groups for postoperative cryotherapy techniques: gel cold pack, cryo-cuff, and MCCD. Scores on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, morphine consumption, knee range of motion (ROM), knee swelling, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative VAS scores showed a significant difference among the groups at 8 and 72 h after surgery (P = 0.002 and 0.026, respectively). At the earliest postoperative time point, post hoc analysis demonstrated that patients in the MCCD group had lower pain scores than those in the gel cold pack (P < 0.001) and the cryo-cuff group (P = 0.030). However, cryo-cuff reduced knee swelling significantly compared to gel cold pack (P = 0.028) and MCCD (P = 0.011) at postoperative 72 h. The total satisfaction score was 86.8, 82.8, and 89.1 with gel cold pack, cryo-cuff, and MCCD, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cryotherapy is an adjunct to post-TKA pain control at the surgical site. MCCD has shown superior efficacy in pain reduction during the earliest postoperative period, and achieved high patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry database (no. TCTR20200517002).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00287-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00287-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:冷冻疗法是一种非药物治疗的选择,是药物治疗的补充,以实现最全面的多模式镇痛。目前有多种技术可用,包括传统的凝胶冷敷、低温袖带和一种新型的移动冷压缩装置(MCCD)。本研究旨在评估和比较三种冷冻治疗技术在全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中的疗效和患者满意度。方法:这项前瞻性随机研究纳入108例计划进行原发性单侧TKA的患者。术后将患者分为凝胶冷敷组、低温袖带组、MCCD组。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛强度、吗啡用量、膝关节活动度、膝关节肿胀、住院时间和患者满意度进行评分。结果:两组患者术后8 h、72 h VAS评分差异有统计学意义(P = 0.002、0.026)。在术后最早的时间点,事后分析表明,MCCD组患者的疼痛评分低于凝胶冷敷组(P结论:冷冻治疗是tka后手术部位疼痛控制的辅助手段。MCCD在术后早期疼痛减轻方面表现出优越的疗效,患者满意度较高。试验注册:本研究已在泰国临床试验注册数据库中注册(编号:TCTR20200517002)。
Comparison of three cryotherapy techniques for early post-TKA pain control in terms of efficacy and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Cryotherapy is a non-pharmacological option that complements drug therapy to achieve the most comprehensive multimodal analgesia. Various techniques are currently available, including the conventional gel cold pack, the cryo-cuff, and a novel mobile cold compression device (MCCD). This study aimed to evaluate and compare three cryotherapy techniques in terms of efficacy and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods: This prospective randomized study included 108 patients who were scheduled for primary unilateral TKA. The patients were allocated to 3 groups for postoperative cryotherapy techniques: gel cold pack, cryo-cuff, and MCCD. Scores on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, morphine consumption, knee range of motion (ROM), knee swelling, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction were collected.
Results: Postoperative VAS scores showed a significant difference among the groups at 8 and 72 h after surgery (P = 0.002 and 0.026, respectively). At the earliest postoperative time point, post hoc analysis demonstrated that patients in the MCCD group had lower pain scores than those in the gel cold pack (P < 0.001) and the cryo-cuff group (P = 0.030). However, cryo-cuff reduced knee swelling significantly compared to gel cold pack (P = 0.028) and MCCD (P = 0.011) at postoperative 72 h. The total satisfaction score was 86.8, 82.8, and 89.1 with gel cold pack, cryo-cuff, and MCCD, respectively.
Conclusions: Cryotherapy is an adjunct to post-TKA pain control at the surgical site. MCCD has shown superior efficacy in pain reduction during the earliest postoperative period, and achieved high patient satisfaction.
Trial registration: This study was registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry database (no. TCTR20200517002).