虚拟现实在单侧空间忽视的临床评估中的应用,当前趋势的剖析:一个范围综述。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Eric Sorita, Noémie C Duclos, Lorina Puech, Quentin Chibaudel, Lisa Quillion-Dupré
{"title":"虚拟现实在单侧空间忽视的临床评估中的应用,当前趋势的剖析:一个范围综述。","authors":"Eric Sorita, Noémie C Duclos, Lorina Puech, Quentin Chibaudel, Lisa Quillion-Dupré","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2439844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual technologies (VR) could respond to several challenges in Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN) assessment, particularly the lack of sensitivity and ecological validity of traditional paper-and-pencil tests. A scoping review was conducted to explore current trends in this area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, IEEE, ACM, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for VR USN assessment. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews were used to inform our methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one publications were included. There were two populations: healthy adults (n = 349) and post-stroke individuals (n = 903). A classification based on tasks and type of interaction used was proposed. Correlations with paper and pencil tests (PPTs) were often significant when the task structure was similar to PPTs but was lacking for activities with more dynamic components. The ecological validity of the tasks was assessed in comparison with the Catherine Bergego Scale (n = 4) and a real-world navigation task (n = 1). Using VR, USN disorders have been characterized using a wide range of indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few studies have addressed ecological validity, yet the use of VR in the assessment of the USN in this scoping review shows an undeniable contribution compared to traditional pencil-paper tests, especially for capturing the patient's behavior toward the far extrapersonal space, essential in daily life.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual reality in clinical evaluation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect, anatomy of current trends: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Sorita, Noémie C Duclos, Lorina Puech, Quentin Chibaudel, Lisa Quillion-Dupré\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2024.2439844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual technologies (VR) could respond to several challenges in Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN) assessment, particularly the lack of sensitivity and ecological validity of traditional paper-and-pencil tests. A scoping review was conducted to explore current trends in this area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, IEEE, ACM, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for VR USN assessment. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews were used to inform our methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one publications were included. There were two populations: healthy adults (n = 349) and post-stroke individuals (n = 903). A classification based on tasks and type of interaction used was proposed. Correlations with paper and pencil tests (PPTs) were often significant when the task structure was similar to PPTs but was lacking for activities with more dynamic components. The ecological validity of the tasks was assessed in comparison with the Catherine Bergego Scale (n = 4) and a real-world navigation task (n = 1). Using VR, USN disorders have been characterized using a wide range of indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few studies have addressed ecological validity, yet the use of VR in the assessment of the USN in this scoping review shows an undeniable contribution compared to traditional pencil-paper tests, especially for capturing the patient's behavior toward the far extrapersonal space, essential in daily life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2439844\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2439844","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚拟技术(VR)可以应对单边空间忽视(USN)评估中的几个挑战,特别是传统纸笔测试缺乏敏感性和生态有效性。进行了范围审查,以探讨这一领域的当前趋势。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Web of Science、IEEE、ACM、Cochrane Library等数据库进行VR USN评估。乔安娜布里格斯研究所的范围审查方法指南被用来指导我们的方法。结果:共纳入31篇文献。有两个人群:健康成年人(n = 349)和中风后个体(n = 903)。提出了一种基于任务和交互类型的分类方法。当任务结构与纸笔测试相似,但缺乏更多动态成分的活动时,与纸笔测试(ppt)的相关性通常是显著的。通过与Catherine Bergego量表(n = 4)和现实世界导航任务(n = 1)进行比较,评估了任务的生态效度。使用VR, USN障碍已使用广泛的指标进行表征。结论:很少有研究涉及生态有效性,然而,与传统的铅笔纸测试相比,在评估USN时使用VR显示了不可否认的贡献,特别是在捕捉患者对日常生活中必不可少的远超个人空间的行为方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual reality in clinical evaluation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect, anatomy of current trends: A scoping review.

Background: Virtual technologies (VR) could respond to several challenges in Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN) assessment, particularly the lack of sensitivity and ecological validity of traditional paper-and-pencil tests. A scoping review was conducted to explore current trends in this area.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, IEEE, ACM, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for VR USN assessment. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews were used to inform our methodology.

Results: Thirty-one publications were included. There were two populations: healthy adults (n = 349) and post-stroke individuals (n = 903). A classification based on tasks and type of interaction used was proposed. Correlations with paper and pencil tests (PPTs) were often significant when the task structure was similar to PPTs but was lacking for activities with more dynamic components. The ecological validity of the tasks was assessed in comparison with the Catherine Bergego Scale (n = 4) and a real-world navigation task (n = 1). Using VR, USN disorders have been characterized using a wide range of indicators.

Conclusions: Few studies have addressed ecological validity, yet the use of VR in the assessment of the USN in this scoping review shows an undeniable contribution compared to traditional pencil-paper tests, especially for capturing the patient's behavior toward the far extrapersonal space, essential in daily life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信