语言评估中的文化偏见:对多元文化加拿大老年人的波士顿命名测试的进一步观察。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Komal T Shaikh, K B Zaidi, Daniela Wong Gonzalez, Christina Dimech, Zoë M Gilson, Kathryn A Stokes, Theone S E Paterson
{"title":"语言评估中的文化偏见:对多元文化加拿大老年人的波士顿命名测试的进一步观察。","authors":"Komal T Shaikh, K B Zaidi, Daniela Wong Gonzalez, Christina Dimech, Zoë M Gilson, Kathryn A Stokes, Theone S E Paterson","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2449172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is commonly used to assess word-finding in older adults but performance may be impacted by cultural and linguistic factors. This study aimed to assess cultural bias in BNT performance among older adults, explore sources of this bias and provide clinical guidelines for its use in multicultural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of 525 older adults referred for neuropsychological assessment at a large geriatric hospital in a multicultural Canadian city. Participants were categorized by birthplace (Canada vs. outside Canada), and relationships between BNT scores, years in Canada, sociodevelopmental context of region of birth and first-language status were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals born outside of Canada had significantly lower BNT scores than Canadian-born participants. These differences were not fully explained by English as a first language status or age at immigration though a significant correlation was observed between BNT scores and years in Canada. Sociodevelopmental context, measured by the Historical Index of Human Development (HIHD), partially mediated the relationship between region of birth and BNT performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BNT is influenced by cultural and linguistic factors, which may lead to inaccurate cognitive assessment in diverse populations. Clinicians should interpret BNT scores with caution in multicultural contexts and consider sociocultural factors to improve diagnostic accuracy and cultural sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural bias in the assessment of language: A closer look at the Boston naming test among multicultural Canadian older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Komal T Shaikh, K B Zaidi, Daniela Wong Gonzalez, Christina Dimech, Zoë M Gilson, Kathryn A Stokes, Theone S E Paterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2024.2449172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is commonly used to assess word-finding in older adults but performance may be impacted by cultural and linguistic factors. This study aimed to assess cultural bias in BNT performance among older adults, explore sources of this bias and provide clinical guidelines for its use in multicultural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of 525 older adults referred for neuropsychological assessment at a large geriatric hospital in a multicultural Canadian city. Participants were categorized by birthplace (Canada vs. outside Canada), and relationships between BNT scores, years in Canada, sociodevelopmental context of region of birth and first-language status were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals born outside of Canada had significantly lower BNT scores than Canadian-born participants. These differences were not fully explained by English as a first language status or age at immigration though a significant correlation was observed between BNT scores and years in Canada. Sociodevelopmental context, measured by the Historical Index of Human Development (HIHD), partially mediated the relationship between region of birth and BNT performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BNT is influenced by cultural and linguistic factors, which may lead to inaccurate cognitive assessment in diverse populations. Clinicians should interpret BNT scores with caution in multicultural contexts and consider sociocultural factors to improve diagnostic accuracy and cultural sensitivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2449172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2449172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:波士顿命名测验(Boston Naming Test, BNT)是一种常用的评估老年人发现单词能力的测验,但其表现可能受到文化和语言因素的影响。本研究旨在评估老年人BNT表现中的文化偏见,探讨这种偏见的来源,并为其在多元文化环境中的应用提供临床指导。方法:我们对在加拿大一个多元文化城市的一家大型老年医院接受神经心理评估的525名老年人进行了回顾性图表回顾。参与者按出生地(加拿大与加拿大以外)分类,并检查了BNT分数、在加拿大居住的年限、出生地区的社会发展背景和第一语言状态之间的关系。结果:出生在加拿大以外的人的BNT得分明显低于加拿大出生的参与者。这些差异不能完全用英语作为第一语言的地位或移民的年龄来解释,尽管BNT分数与在加拿大的时间之间存在显著的相关性。社会发展背景,由人类发展历史指数(HIHD)衡量,部分介导了出生地区和BNT表现之间的关系。结论:BNT受文化和语言因素的影响,可能导致不同人群的认知评估不准确。临床医生应在多元文化背景下谨慎解释BNT评分,并考虑社会文化因素,以提高诊断的准确性和文化敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultural bias in the assessment of language: A closer look at the Boston naming test among multicultural Canadian older adults.

Objective: The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is commonly used to assess word-finding in older adults but performance may be impacted by cultural and linguistic factors. This study aimed to assess cultural bias in BNT performance among older adults, explore sources of this bias and provide clinical guidelines for its use in multicultural settings.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 525 older adults referred for neuropsychological assessment at a large geriatric hospital in a multicultural Canadian city. Participants were categorized by birthplace (Canada vs. outside Canada), and relationships between BNT scores, years in Canada, sociodevelopmental context of region of birth and first-language status were examined.

Results: Individuals born outside of Canada had significantly lower BNT scores than Canadian-born participants. These differences were not fully explained by English as a first language status or age at immigration though a significant correlation was observed between BNT scores and years in Canada. Sociodevelopmental context, measured by the Historical Index of Human Development (HIHD), partially mediated the relationship between region of birth and BNT performance.

Conclusions: The BNT is influenced by cultural and linguistic factors, which may lead to inaccurate cognitive assessment in diverse populations. Clinicians should interpret BNT scores with caution in multicultural contexts and consider sociocultural factors to improve diagnostic accuracy and cultural sensitivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信