多组分家庭物理治疗干预对认知结局的影响:来自CAP随机对照试验的结果。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Ann L Gruber-Baldini, Richard H Fortinsky, Barbara Resnick, Laurence S Magder, Brock A Beamer, Kathleen Mangione, Denise Orwig, Ellen F Binder, Michael Terrin, Jay Magaziner
{"title":"多组分家庭物理治疗干预对认知结局的影响:来自CAP随机对照试验的结果。","authors":"Ann L Gruber-Baldini, Richard H Fortinsky, Barbara Resnick, Laurence S Magder, Brock A Beamer, Kathleen Mangione, Denise Orwig, Ellen F Binder, Michael Terrin, Jay Magaziner","doi":"10.1177/08982643241311624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Differences in cognitive outcomes for two home-based 16-week interventions after usual rehabilitative care post-hip fracture were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community Ambulation Project randomized controlled trial included 210 hip fracture participants. Interventions: Specific multi-component (PUSH) included strength-, balance-, function-, and endurance-based exercises; non-specific active control (PULSE) included seated range-of-motion exercises and sensory transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation. Cognitive measures: Modified Mini-Mental State Examination, plus Hooper Visual Organization Test and Trails A/B in an ancillary study (CAP-MP, <i>n</i> = 40), assessed pre-randomization and 16 and 40 weeks post-randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 16 weeks, PUSH-assigned participants became faster on Trails A (Δ = -6.3, 95% CI: -16.7, 4.2); those in PULSE became slower (Δ = 9.3, 95% CI: -1.7, 20.3, <i>p</i> = .04). At 40 weeks, PUSH-assigned participants became faster on Trails B (Δ = -21.5, 95% CI: -46.2, 3.3) while those in PULSE became slower (Δ = 15.2, 95% CI: -11.9, 42.3, <i>p</i> = .04). No other significant differences were found.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results suggest that multi-component exercise interventions like PUSH may prevent/delay decline or improve attention and psychomotor speed in patients with recent hip fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":51385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Health","volume":" ","pages":"8982643241311624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Multi-Component Home-Based Physical Therapy Intervention on Cognitive Outcomes: Results From the CAP Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ann L Gruber-Baldini, Richard H Fortinsky, Barbara Resnick, Laurence S Magder, Brock A Beamer, Kathleen Mangione, Denise Orwig, Ellen F Binder, Michael Terrin, Jay Magaziner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08982643241311624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Differences in cognitive outcomes for two home-based 16-week interventions after usual rehabilitative care post-hip fracture were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community Ambulation Project randomized controlled trial included 210 hip fracture participants. Interventions: Specific multi-component (PUSH) included strength-, balance-, function-, and endurance-based exercises; non-specific active control (PULSE) included seated range-of-motion exercises and sensory transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation. Cognitive measures: Modified Mini-Mental State Examination, plus Hooper Visual Organization Test and Trails A/B in an ancillary study (CAP-MP, <i>n</i> = 40), assessed pre-randomization and 16 and 40 weeks post-randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 16 weeks, PUSH-assigned participants became faster on Trails A (Δ = -6.3, 95% CI: -16.7, 4.2); those in PULSE became slower (Δ = 9.3, 95% CI: -1.7, 20.3, <i>p</i> = .04). At 40 weeks, PUSH-assigned participants became faster on Trails B (Δ = -21.5, 95% CI: -46.2, 3.3) while those in PULSE became slower (Δ = 15.2, 95% CI: -11.9, 42.3, <i>p</i> = .04). No other significant differences were found.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results suggest that multi-component exercise interventions like PUSH may prevent/delay decline or improve attention and psychomotor speed in patients with recent hip fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8982643241311624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643241311624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643241311624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:观察髋部骨折后常规康复治疗后16周两种家庭干预的认知结局差异。方法:社区活动计划随机对照试验纳入210例髋部骨折患者。干预措施:特定多组分(PUSH)包括力量、平衡、功能和耐力训练;非特异性主动控制(PULSE)包括坐式活动范围练习和感觉经皮神经电刺激。认知测量:在一项辅助研究(CAP-MP, n = 40)中,改进的迷你精神状态检查,加上Hooper视觉组织测试和Trails A/B,评估随机化前和随机化后16周和40周。结果:16周后,push分配的参与者在步道A上变得更快(Δ = -6.3, 95% CI: -16.7, 4.2);PULSE组变慢(Δ = 9.3, 95% CI: -1.7, 20.3, p = 0.04)。在40周时,push分配的参与者在trail B上变得更快(Δ = -21.5, 95% CI: -46.2, 3.3),而PULSE组的参与者变得更慢(Δ = 15.2, 95% CI: -11.9, 42.3, p = .04)。未发现其他显著差异。讨论:结果表明,像PUSH这样的多组分运动干预可以预防/延缓近期髋部骨折患者的注意力和精神运动速度的下降或改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a Multi-Component Home-Based Physical Therapy Intervention on Cognitive Outcomes: Results From the CAP Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: Differences in cognitive outcomes for two home-based 16-week interventions after usual rehabilitative care post-hip fracture were examined.

Methods: Community Ambulation Project randomized controlled trial included 210 hip fracture participants. Interventions: Specific multi-component (PUSH) included strength-, balance-, function-, and endurance-based exercises; non-specific active control (PULSE) included seated range-of-motion exercises and sensory transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation. Cognitive measures: Modified Mini-Mental State Examination, plus Hooper Visual Organization Test and Trails A/B in an ancillary study (CAP-MP, n = 40), assessed pre-randomization and 16 and 40 weeks post-randomization.

Results: Over 16 weeks, PUSH-assigned participants became faster on Trails A (Δ = -6.3, 95% CI: -16.7, 4.2); those in PULSE became slower (Δ = 9.3, 95% CI: -1.7, 20.3, p = .04). At 40 weeks, PUSH-assigned participants became faster on Trails B (Δ = -21.5, 95% CI: -46.2, 3.3) while those in PULSE became slower (Δ = 15.2, 95% CI: -11.9, 42.3, p = .04). No other significant differences were found.

Discussion: Results suggest that multi-component exercise interventions like PUSH may prevent/delay decline or improve attention and psychomotor speed in patients with recent hip fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Health is an interdisciplinary forum for the presentation of research findings and scholarly exchange in the area of aging and health. Manuscripts are sought that deal with social and behavioral factors related to health and aging. Disciplines represented include the behavioral and social sciences, public health, epidemiology, demography, health services research, nursing, social work, medicine, and related disciplines. Although preference is given to manuscripts presenting the findings of original research, review and methodological pieces will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信