Hector A Corredor, Carolina Sandoval-Salinas, Juan M Martinez, Jorge Barba, Francisco Patrón
{"title":"两种冲击波疗法治疗血管性勃起功能障碍的有效性比较:一项随机、多中心、开放标签、非效性的4期临床试验","authors":"Hector A Corredor, Carolina Sandoval-Salinas, Juan M Martinez, Jorge Barba, Francisco Patrón","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shockwave therapy is an optional adjuvant treatment for vascular erectile dysfunction (ED). There is variability in treatment protocols and challenges with patients adherence to the weekly protocol, which is the most commonly used.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the noninferiority of a monthly shockwave therapy protocol compared to the weekly protocol for treating vascular ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, open-label, control active, multicenter clinical trial was conducted. A total of 184 men diagnosed with vascular ED, without comorbid conditions associated with secondary dysfunction or active treatment for ED, were included across 5 clinics in Mexico and Colombia. Patients were randomized to receive either 6 sessions of weekly or monthly shockwave therapy, applying the same parameters for both groups.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Questionnaire score at 24 weeks after treatment, assessed using a noninferiority approach. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement, erection hardness, and self-esteem (SEAR Questionnaire) at posttreatment, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 24-week posttreatment, the average change in IIEF-EF was 1.93 (± 6.55; 95% CI 0.49-3.38) in the weekly group and 4.30 (± 6.78; 95% CI 2.69-5.9) in the monthly group, demonstrating noninferiority of the monthly protocol (difference -2.36; 95% CI -4.4 to -0.2; noninferiority P < .0001). At the end of treatment, clinical improvement was achieved by 55.2% of participants in the monthly protocol and 30.9% in the weekly (P = .042). No significant differences were found in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A 6-session monthly shockwave therapy regimen could improve erectile function in men with ED.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>This is the largest clinical trial to date evaluating shockwave therapy regimens for ED. The principal limitations were the absence of objective vascular assessment of the changes produced by shockwaves, and the absence of a placebo control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A monthly protocol of 6 shockwave therapy sessions is noninferior to a weekly protocol up to 6 months after therapy, in men with vascular ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":51100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 shockwave therapy protocols for the treatment of vascular erectile dysfunction: a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, phase 4 clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hector A Corredor, Carolina Sandoval-Salinas, Juan M Martinez, Jorge Barba, Francisco Patrón\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shockwave therapy is an optional adjuvant treatment for vascular erectile dysfunction (ED). There is variability in treatment protocols and challenges with patients adherence to the weekly protocol, which is the most commonly used.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the noninferiority of a monthly shockwave therapy protocol compared to the weekly protocol for treating vascular ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, open-label, control active, multicenter clinical trial was conducted. A total of 184 men diagnosed with vascular ED, without comorbid conditions associated with secondary dysfunction or active treatment for ED, were included across 5 clinics in Mexico and Colombia. Patients were randomized to receive either 6 sessions of weekly or monthly shockwave therapy, applying the same parameters for both groups.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Questionnaire score at 24 weeks after treatment, assessed using a noninferiority approach. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement, erection hardness, and self-esteem (SEAR Questionnaire) at posttreatment, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 24-week posttreatment, the average change in IIEF-EF was 1.93 (± 6.55; 95% CI 0.49-3.38) in the weekly group and 4.30 (± 6.78; 95% CI 2.69-5.9) in the monthly group, demonstrating noninferiority of the monthly protocol (difference -2.36; 95% CI -4.4 to -0.2; noninferiority P < .0001). At the end of treatment, clinical improvement was achieved by 55.2% of participants in the monthly protocol and 30.9% in the weekly (P = .042). No significant differences were found in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A 6-session monthly shockwave therapy regimen could improve erectile function in men with ED.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>This is the largest clinical trial to date evaluating shockwave therapy regimens for ED. The principal limitations were the absence of objective vascular assessment of the changes produced by shockwaves, and the absence of a placebo control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A monthly protocol of 6 shockwave therapy sessions is noninferior to a weekly protocol up to 6 months after therapy, in men with vascular ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sexual Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sexual Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae205\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:冲击波治疗是血管性勃起功能障碍(ED)的一种选择性辅助治疗方法。治疗方案存在差异,患者对最常用的每周治疗方案的依从性存在挑战。目的:本研究旨在评价每月冲击波治疗方案与每周冲击波治疗方案治疗血管性ed的非劣效性。方法:进行随机、开放标签、有效对照、多中心临床试验。共有184名诊断为血管性ED的男性,没有与继发性功能障碍相关的合并症或ED的积极治疗,来自墨西哥和哥伦比亚的5家诊所。患者随机接受每周6次或每月6次的冲击波治疗,两组采用相同的参数。结果:主要结果是治疗后24周国际勃起功能指数-勃起功能域(IIEF-EF)问卷评分的变化,采用非劣效性方法评估。次要结果包括治疗后、12周和24周随访时的临床改善、勃起硬度和自尊(SEAR问卷)。结果:治疗后24周,IIEF-EF平均变化1.93(±6.55;每周治疗组95% CI 0.49-3.38), 4.30(±6.78;95% CI 2.69-5.9),表明每月方案的非劣效性(差异-2.36;95% CI -4.4 ~ -0.2;临床意义:每月6次的冲击波治疗方案可以改善ED患者的勃起功能。优势和局限性:这是迄今为止评估ED冲击波治疗方案的最大临床试验。主要局限性是缺乏对冲击波产生的变化的客观血管评估,以及缺乏安慰剂对照组。结论:对于血管性ED患者,在治疗后6个月内,每月6次的冲击波治疗方案不低于每周的方案。
Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 shockwave therapy protocols for the treatment of vascular erectile dysfunction: a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, phase 4 clinical trial.
Background: Shockwave therapy is an optional adjuvant treatment for vascular erectile dysfunction (ED). There is variability in treatment protocols and challenges with patients adherence to the weekly protocol, which is the most commonly used.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the noninferiority of a monthly shockwave therapy protocol compared to the weekly protocol for treating vascular ED.
Methods: A randomized, open-label, control active, multicenter clinical trial was conducted. A total of 184 men diagnosed with vascular ED, without comorbid conditions associated with secondary dysfunction or active treatment for ED, were included across 5 clinics in Mexico and Colombia. Patients were randomized to receive either 6 sessions of weekly or monthly shockwave therapy, applying the same parameters for both groups.
Outcomes: The primary outcome was the change in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Questionnaire score at 24 weeks after treatment, assessed using a noninferiority approach. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement, erection hardness, and self-esteem (SEAR Questionnaire) at posttreatment, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks of follow-up.
Results: At 24-week posttreatment, the average change in IIEF-EF was 1.93 (± 6.55; 95% CI 0.49-3.38) in the weekly group and 4.30 (± 6.78; 95% CI 2.69-5.9) in the monthly group, demonstrating noninferiority of the monthly protocol (difference -2.36; 95% CI -4.4 to -0.2; noninferiority P < .0001). At the end of treatment, clinical improvement was achieved by 55.2% of participants in the monthly protocol and 30.9% in the weekly (P = .042). No significant differences were found in other outcomes.
Clinical implications: A 6-session monthly shockwave therapy regimen could improve erectile function in men with ED.
Strengths and limitations: This is the largest clinical trial to date evaluating shockwave therapy regimens for ED. The principal limitations were the absence of objective vascular assessment of the changes produced by shockwaves, and the absence of a placebo control group.
Conclusion: A monthly protocol of 6 shockwave therapy sessions is noninferior to a weekly protocol up to 6 months after therapy, in men with vascular ED.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sexual Medicine publishes multidisciplinary basic science and clinical research to define and understand the scientific basis of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction. As an official journal of the International Society for Sexual Medicine and the International Society for the Study of Women''s Sexual Health, it provides healthcare professionals in sexual medicine with essential educational content and promotes the exchange of scientific information generated from experimental and clinical research.
The Journal of Sexual Medicine includes basic science and clinical research studies in the psychologic and biologic aspects of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction, and highlights new observations and research, results with innovative treatments and all other topics relevant to clinical sexual medicine.
The objective of The Journal of Sexual Medicine is to serve as an interdisciplinary forum to integrate the exchange among disciplines concerned with the whole field of human sexuality. The journal accomplishes this objective by publishing original articles, as well as other scientific and educational documents that support the mission of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.