渴望额外培训的家庭医学住院医师有何不同?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Peter J Carek, Stephen M Carek, John Emerson, Vicki Nelson, Tomoko Sairenji, Sarah Fleischer, Lars E Peterson
{"title":"渴望额外培训的家庭医学住院医师有何不同?","authors":"Peter J Carek, Stephen M Carek, John Emerson, Vicki Nelson, Tomoko Sairenji, Sarah Fleischer, Lars E Peterson","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2024.583711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Limited knowledge is present regarding how fellowship training correlates with graduate outcomes and whether current residents desire an additional year of residency training. The aim of this study is to examine trends in fellowship training and compare residency and practice outcomes between those interested and those not interested in fellowship training as well as the proportion of residents desiring an additional year of residency training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared data from the American Board of Family Medicine Initial Certification Questionnaire (2017-2019) to the National Graduate Survey (NGS; 2020-2022). We used bivariate analysis and ꭓ2 tests to assess for changes over time and to determine whether an association exists between those likely to pursue a fellowship and those interested in an additional year of residency training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample included 4,930 residency graduates with NGS data (response rate 46.8%). Overall, most (71.0%) respondents were not interested in any type of additional training. We found no differences in interest in a fellowship based on in-training examination (ITE), certification scores, or milestones attainment. Respondents without interest in a fellowship were more likely to provide continuity of care in practice, while respondents with interest in a fellowship were more likely to be faculty and less likely to have symptoms of burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intention for fellowship training is associated with future faculty members and lower rates of symptoms of burnout and continuity practice. A majority of responding family medicine residents (&gt;70%) do not favor an additional year of residency training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Different Are Family Medicine Residents Who Desire Additional Training?\",\"authors\":\"Peter J Carek, Stephen M Carek, John Emerson, Vicki Nelson, Tomoko Sairenji, Sarah Fleischer, Lars E Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/FamMed.2024.583711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Limited knowledge is present regarding how fellowship training correlates with graduate outcomes and whether current residents desire an additional year of residency training. The aim of this study is to examine trends in fellowship training and compare residency and practice outcomes between those interested and those not interested in fellowship training as well as the proportion of residents desiring an additional year of residency training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared data from the American Board of Family Medicine Initial Certification Questionnaire (2017-2019) to the National Graduate Survey (NGS; 2020-2022). We used bivariate analysis and ꭓ2 tests to assess for changes over time and to determine whether an association exists between those likely to pursue a fellowship and those interested in an additional year of residency training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample included 4,930 residency graduates with NGS data (response rate 46.8%). Overall, most (71.0%) respondents were not interested in any type of additional training. We found no differences in interest in a fellowship based on in-training examination (ITE), certification scores, or milestones attainment. Respondents without interest in a fellowship were more likely to provide continuity of care in practice, while respondents with interest in a fellowship were more likely to be faculty and less likely to have symptoms of burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intention for fellowship training is associated with future faculty members and lower rates of symptoms of burnout and continuity practice. A majority of responding family medicine residents (&gt;70%) do not favor an additional year of residency training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.583711\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.583711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:目前关于奖学金培训与毕业成果的关系以及当前住院医师是否需要额外一年的住院医师培训的知识有限。本研究的目的是研究奖学金培训的趋势,比较对奖学金培训感兴趣和不感兴趣的住院医师和实践结果,以及希望额外一年住院医师培训的住院医师比例。方法:我们比较了美国家庭医学委员会初始认证问卷(2017-2019)和全国毕业生调查(NGS;2020 - 2022)。我们使用双变量分析和ꭓ2测试来评估随时间的变化,并确定可能追求奖学金的人与对额外一年住院医师培训感兴趣的人之间是否存在关联。结果:最终样本包括4930名具有NGS数据的住院医师毕业生,回复率为46.8%。总体而言,大多数(71.0%)受访者对任何类型的额外培训都不感兴趣。我们发现,基于培训考试(ITE)、认证分数或里程碑成就的奖学金的兴趣没有差异。对奖学金不感兴趣的受访者更有可能在实践中提供连续性的护理,而对奖学金感兴趣的受访者更有可能是教员,不太可能出现倦怠症状。结论:奖学金培训的意向与未来的教师、较低的倦怠症状率和连续性实践有关。大多数家庭医学住院医师(70%)不赞成额外一年的住院医师培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Different Are Family Medicine Residents Who Desire Additional Training?

Background and objectives: Limited knowledge is present regarding how fellowship training correlates with graduate outcomes and whether current residents desire an additional year of residency training. The aim of this study is to examine trends in fellowship training and compare residency and practice outcomes between those interested and those not interested in fellowship training as well as the proportion of residents desiring an additional year of residency training.

Methods: We compared data from the American Board of Family Medicine Initial Certification Questionnaire (2017-2019) to the National Graduate Survey (NGS; 2020-2022). We used bivariate analysis and ꭓ2 tests to assess for changes over time and to determine whether an association exists between those likely to pursue a fellowship and those interested in an additional year of residency training.

Results: The final sample included 4,930 residency graduates with NGS data (response rate 46.8%). Overall, most (71.0%) respondents were not interested in any type of additional training. We found no differences in interest in a fellowship based on in-training examination (ITE), certification scores, or milestones attainment. Respondents without interest in a fellowship were more likely to provide continuity of care in practice, while respondents with interest in a fellowship were more likely to be faculty and less likely to have symptoms of burnout.

Conclusions: Intention for fellowship training is associated with future faculty members and lower rates of symptoms of burnout and continuity practice. A majority of responding family medicine residents (>70%) do not favor an additional year of residency training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信